• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent, if any, did the Chernobyl Nuclear Disaster contribute to the fall of the Soviet Union?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

To what extent, if any, did the Chernobyl Nuclear Disaster contribute to the fall of the Soviet Union? Word count: 1,998 A. Plan of Investigation According to the International Nuclear Event Scale, April 26, 1986 marked the worst nuclear power plant accident in history, the Chernobyl Nuclear Disaster. This power plant in Ukraine was under direct jurisdiction of the central Moscow authorities, and the accident raised concerns about the safety of the Soviet nuclear power industry.1 Five years later, the Soviet Union collapsed. Within this context, to what extent, if any, did the Chernobyl Nuclear Disaster contribute to the fall of the Soviet Union? In order to understand the extent of the impact that the catastrophe had, the investigation will examine the Soviet government's engineering operations and lack of safety culture, the government's actions after the disaster and the possible cover-up, and the ideas and reactions during the time that may have contributed to the fall. Historical research and oral history will be used to evaluate Chernobyl's significance. Two of which will be Gorbachev's Glasnost: Red Star Rising, a compilation of editorials from various United States newspapers addressing the Chernobyl accident and a translation of a Moscow broadcast report in The Ukrainian Quarterly, which will both provide Western and Soviet reactions and insight to the Soviet government's role during the nuclear crisis and will then be evaluated for their origins, purposes, values, and limitations. B. Summary of Evidence In the midst of the Cold War, the power of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union (CPSU) ...read more.

Middle

mentioning their own nuclear catastrophes in his speech in order to divert the attention from only Soviet nuclear mistakes, and felt that his country's "misfortune was being used as a propaganda point."21 Approximately 300-600 million people were contaminated (estimates vary).22 Soviet officials confirmed that the general public was kept in the dark during the incident;23 one even stated, "If we are treating a patient for cancer, we never tell them they have it; we don't want to give them hope. In this regard, we treat the population as children."24 Western leaders called for a international convention requiring information exchanges on nuclear accidents and emergencies with the Soviet Union under condemnation for not initially revealing the accident and withholding information on the mishap.25 C. Evaluation of Sources According to a Moscow broadcast report, the Soviet Union hid the incident from the general public. Translated by Yurii Bohatiuk in The Ukrainian Quarterly of 1986, this broadcast that originated from the Soviet government, stated that "there [was] no destruction that some Western agencies [were] writing about." Its purpose was to provide a counterstory to the outside news media's reports, attempting to prevent any public panic that could occur. It also accused Western mass media of spreading rumors. In light of the opening of the Soviet archives after 1991, this source is valuable since it supported the fact that the Soviet government was secretive about its operations, which contributed to the responsive ideals of "public-openness." This source is limited because it serves as a public broadcast to downplay the incident and not as a government memorandum. ...read more.

Conclusion

The exploitation of the Soviet government caused many citizens to view the regime as illegitimate, especially since so many of their lives were at stake. The disaster opened a "Pandora's Box" of negativity toward the central government. Once the government was longer seen as infallible, its people began to lose confidence. Eventually, in 1991, with so much opposition from its people and within its own government, the Soviet Union collapsed. However, the contamination from the Chernobyl Nuclear Disaster still lingers, and many lives, including military personnel that tried to clean up the mess, were lost. E. Conclusion The Chernobyl Nuclear Disaster still carries a great impact and shook the Soviet Union into a harsh reality, a crisis of leadership. However, historians such as James Oberg argue that it was the policy of glasnost that was the greatest contributing factor toward the fall of the Soviet Union. This policy was already taking its course, but the disaster led to international involvement. With the availability of mass media, both Western and Soviet, this disaster sped up the eventual victory of openness over reflexive secrecy. The Soviet people were already experiencing a deteriorating economy, but then they fell victim to the deathly consequences of a corrupt society, leading to the unveiling of other government crimes such as the use of a black market system that mainly benefited corrupt Communists officials. The Chernobyl Disaster helped determine whether the government was adequate and successful in its response to a time of trouble, but glasnost revealed to the Soviet people that the government was not. F. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate History section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate History essays

  1. To what extent did the Prague spring weaken Moscow(TM)s hold over Czechoslovakia, and Eastern ...

    Censorship was abolished in May 196810 Criticism ran rampant whether societal or even governmental. The party was divided. There were the Novotnovici (supporters of former leader Antonin Novotn´┐Ż) and others who supported the reforms made by Alexander Dubcek. In April 1968 Dubcek released his Action Program, which aimed at working

  2. Constitution and New Government

    No authority to stop slave trade for 20 years a. Large and difficult concession for anti-slavery activists, but without it, the constitution would fail f. Other issues not brought to agreement were left out for later years i. New courts allowed to review acts of legislature 1.

  1. Notes on the History and Development of the Arab-Israeli Conflict

    This transfer gave the Palestinians very limited control: o The areas they controlled were separated o Water supplies in some areas were under Israeli control o Israeli troops retained the right to enter these areas if necessary o Palestinian police could not arrest Israelis o A Palestinian executive was to

  2. To what extent did the Munich Conference contribute to the outbreak of World War ...

    Moreover, Britain was not prepared for a war with Germany ?Britain was unprepared for war. She had no draft, no Spitfires, no divisions ready to be sent to France? (Mandel and Buchanan). Hence, a peaceful solution was crucial for Great Britain.

  1. A look at the Differing Views of Jimmy Hoffa by the Government, the Public, ...

    The importance of the trucking industry to the economy was one of the main reasons for increasing influence of the Teamsters. Dave Beck would succeed Tobin as president after his retirement in 1952, but would eventually be discredited after investigations into his misuse of union funds.

  2. Analyse the causes and consequences of Glasnost and Perestroika up until 2000

    Large inflation even made food, products and services more expensive, meaning people could afford to buy less, which lowered their living standard. The command economy led to low productivity and labor shortages, as workers weren?t motivated to produce for the collective gain, knowing their personal gain from working hard would be very little.

  1. Was Gorbachev a "Wind of change"?

    The results of this reform were not satisfying for Gorbachev, because the elections were not won by Gorbachev supporters, but by ?nationalist, ?so the demand grew for independence? (History a Comprehensive Guide to Paper 1, p.191). In close connection with Perestroika stood Glasnost, a reform that implemented more openness and

  2. Is there any suspicion with regard to the death of Vladimir Lenin, the undisputed ...

    The blood pressure was pretty much normal, he did not smoke; neither did he suffer from diabetes. These are few of the reasons which could result in possible heart failure or abrupt death, however since none of these reasons was found in autopsy, the possibility of natural death was further

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work