• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent is there validity to Ilan Pappes argument that the Palestinians were victims of a deliberate Israeli policy of ethnic cleansing in 1948?

Extracts from this document...


PLAN- FOR: * Plan D * Dier Yassin * UN partition plan * Ethnic cleansing * Zionist intimidation * "No room for both peoples in this country" * Boundary establishment. Territorial loss * Attacks on Arab villages * The Jewish offer to stay deceitful and hypocritical * Arab pop in the state may cause trouble * Room for more Jews Lydda and Ramla had the Arab communities driven out * Moshe Sharettt * David Ben-Gurrion * No evidence supporting Israeli claims * Israel's interests AGAINST: * Inter-communal violence * Encouraged by invading Arab armies * Dier Yassin was exaggerated. Scared many people * Rumours spread * No resilience to protect from Arab countries * Jewish attacks were in retaliation to Palestinian attacks. Convoy incident * Arab violence was more brutal. The Palestinians anticipated the same in return. * Left voluntarily. Will be defeated soon. Return soon. * 156,000 still remained in Israel * Neighbouring countries welcomed the refugees encouraging them to leave. * Could have accepted the UN partition plan which would have avoided the refugee problem by avoiding the war altogether. * Were not really "refugees" * Plan D didn't actually state the idea of ethnic cleansing. Was vague. ...read more.


All of these quotes support the want of the Arabs out of the country and the keen desire to keep it that way. There are also towns with evidence showing the deliberate expulsion of the Arabs from those areas. The well heard examples of Lydda and Ramala, as seen in source O as well as in source S, where 'ethnically cleansed' "in response to direct decisions by Israeli leaders". These show clearly that the Arabs were forced out of their country for the interests of Israel. The Israeli leaders had a clear aim to expel the Palestinians and make Israel an all-Jewish state without any interference. On the other hand, we have evidence showing that it was not entirely the Jews who were responsible for the refugee crisis. Many of the Palestinians were actually afraid of the inter-communal violence taking place and not the persecution by the Jews [Source B]. The war had brought about a lot of enmity between the two races and this lead to violence taking place. However, though this is true to a great extent, the Jews took this violence into their own interests to drive out the Arabs in many cases. ...read more.


"The Palestinian exodus had by this time assumed its own dynamic" and the turn of event coincidently were in favour of the Israelis. Plan D was also a plan "to counter the expected pan-Arab assault on the emergent Jewish state." [Source O]. The uncertainties and fear created during this period added to the cause of departure of the Palestinians. The refugee crisis is a delicate matter for both the Jews as well as the Arabs. Blame cannot be entirely put on either of the groups, as there were many outside factors resulting to this political quagmire. Strong arguments can be held from either perspective, but one has to accept that history is shaped by individual perspectives and each source would be lenient to either side. As said by Mark Tessler "In the face of incomplete evidence and conflicting claims... there is no single cause of the Palestinian refugee problem and accordingly, that there is a mixture of fact and propaganda in both the Arab and Israeli arguments." One has to take a self-evaluated stand and till there is more evidence available, we can only hope these are morally correct. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate History section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate History essays

  1. Did Germany plan and wage a deliberate war of aggression in 1914?

    They assumed/hoped that both Britain and France wouldn't get drawn in with the crisis in the Balkans, merely because it didn't concern them, and that lack of Anglo-French support would lead to improved understanding with Russia. Hillgrubed argued that when Austria's attack on Serbia triggered the mobilization of the massive Russian army, rather than backing down as anticipated.

  2. Women During the Period of Crusades. Crusades were expeditions as well as being ...

    For rather I in such wish to die than be slain when my husband cometh home, for he charged me to keep it." By the Second Crusade, kings and nobles were required to leave property and assets to be managed and protected by women.

  1. Israeli- Palestinian Conflict. I chose this topic due to my personal connection with ...

    Israel has built nearly 250 illegal settlements on the Palestinian territory, which has caused a huge refugee crisis in the Middle East. Currently, there are 7 million Palestinian refugees and 1.5 million Palestinian Israelis live under race-based Apartheid law4. Over 25,000 Palestinian homes have been demolished since 1967, mostly due to the illegal settlements Israel has built.

  2. To What Extent was Arab Zionist Tension the Result of the Interference of Foreign ...

    This was sowing the seeds of the tension between the two groups and suspicions were harboured by both that Britain had the other's interests at heart. So the Jews and Arabs now both thought that they should be given the area, this dispute created great tension between the groups.

  1. To what extent was Israeli foreign policy from 1949 to 1967 only reactive?

    This would then prevent the British forces in the Canal Zone from withdrawing. The plot was detected, Lavon dismissed and the Egyptian Jews involved brought to trial. Because of the fact that Israel engage in covert actions without having a concrete reason to justify their actions the Israel foreign policy changes from being reactive to active.

  2. To what extent were the social changes in Germany between 1865 and 1890 the ...

    Before Bismarck, German states were living their separate and politically secure existence. Different principalities such as Hanover were able to pursue their own separate diplomacy, for example the House of Hanover was so ambitious as to inherit the very crown of Great Britain.

  1. An Ethnic History of Canada.

    The group also showed favoritism to new immigrants from England and the Church of England. Residents of Upper Canada begin to identify themselves as Anglophone Canadians; separate from those who identify themselves as British. 1857: "Civilization of Indian Tribes? Act is passed.

  2. To what extent did the previous French occupation of Lebanon influence religious and ethnic ...

    in 1946 and was settled in October 1989, under an accord negotiated by the Lebanese Parliament in the town of Tai?f, Saudi Arabia. Although they have written a relatively short research paper they have covered a majority of the main points and problems that led to the cause of the war.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work