• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent was Germanys defeat in WW1 due to the Allies strengths and successes?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

To what extent was Germany's defeat in WW1 due to the Allies' strengths and successes? Germany's defeat at the hands of the Allies in WW1 lies more so in the failures of the German armed forces than the strengths and successes of the Allies. Historians have linked two key causes, the miscalculations of German strategies and failed battle tactics, as well as the greater strength of the Allied forces and their multiple successes as the reasons for Germany's defeat. Of the two, Germany's countless mistakes hold a far greater responsibility for it's own defeat, as it allowed the Allies to have the upper hand too many times. Had Germany been more prompt and successful on the battlefield, it is quite possible that they could have held off the more numerous forces of the Allied militaries whilst engaging them on fewer fronts. The total amount of troops available to Allied forces during World War One was in excess of forty-two million mobilized personnel and was undoubtedly a definite factor in the defeat of Germany. ...read more.

Middle

captured quickly, effectively cutting off the Western approach to Germany and allowing for troop turn overs to defend the Eastern Front from the advancing Russian Forces. Instead, Germany did not get the quick victory they desired and now faced war on multiple fronts. Theyhad become tied down in a stalemate with French forces, allowing the Allies the opportunity to take advantage of the situation. As a result of German delay in Belgium, the rapid mobilization of Russian troops had far more reaching effects than would have been possible. Invading East Prussia, the Tsar's forces were initially successful against the Austrian forces and would prove to be troublesome for the German army, who had to continually rescue their far weaker Austrian ally. This drew resources from the critical fighting that continued in the West and allowed for exploitation of German forces by Allied troops.Germany's choice of weak allies therefore provided the Allied forces with further leverage against the German forces. German defeat in WW1 was more due to desire to make the failed Schlieffen Plan work rather than the success of the Allies. ...read more.

Conclusion

providing Allied forces with the crucial reinforcement of more than four million fresh troops and millions of dollars in resources that saw them revived, fuelling the advance to the Hindenburg Line pressuring the Germans in to a hasty defeat. German naval strategy therefore backfired, allowing the Allies to again seize the upper hand and use their more numerous forces to full effectiveness counter-attacking Ludendorff's Peace Offensive, which saw German forces overstretched and forced them back to the Hindenburg Line a second time. The Allies evident strength and more numerous successes over the German forces in World War Onewere a pivotal factor in the defeat of Germany yet could have proved meaningless if they lacked the tactical advantages yielded to them by the incessant miscalculations and strategic failures of the German armed forces. The defeat of Germany in World War One is therefore primarily the result of German failure to fulfill the strategic objectives outlined in the Schlieffen Plan, further exaggerated by a bad choice of allies and tactical miscalculations inherent to their lack of back up plans. ?? ?? ?? ?? 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate History section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate History essays

  1. Causes of WW1

    Germany also tried to take places such as Morocco from France. This greatly angered France as Morocco was one of their major colonies. All of this fighting for land, mainly in Africa caused much tension between rival powers in Europe.

  2. Civil War Prompt

    just disagreeing with the other's way of life, and because of this people had even more reason to come together and give their loyalty to their own state and region rather than to their divided country.

  1. Why did Germany & Her Allies Lose WW1?

    possible due to the growing power of Russia and issued Austria a "blank cheque" as a result, The "September Program" of German Chancellor Bethmann Hollweg showed that Germany always had annexationist aims and the Junker class of Germany who felt under threat from socialism were keen to unite the nation with a military victory.

  2. Discuss the successes and failures of Henry I as king of England

    He intervened often in Welsh affairs; launching large-scale invasions in 1114 and 1121, and making and braking alliances and families. For all but the first two years of the thirty-five year reign of Henry I, England was at peace. This is what I would take for the granted and most important success in his reign.

  1. Evaluate the successes and failures of one ruler of a single-party state

    The switch to a policy contradicting the original that had been put forth by Trotsky also helped in Stalin's discrediting of Trotsky, in conjunction with various other forms of propaganda. On the other hand, the same could be said for negative externalities that resulted from Stalin's 'productivity', the argument being

  2. Compare and Contrast the Democratic Successes and Failures of Andrew Jackson and Nelson Mandela

    the past such as the balance of state and federal powers and throwing the system of checks and balances into turmoil.

  1. To what extent did the Prague spring weaken Moscow(TM)s hold over Czechoslovakia, and Eastern ...

    The Historian John Gaddis said that America and the USSR "had one thing in common: their Euro centrism" 5. After over 20 years of Soviet rule "a power struggle erupted in late 1967"6. Certain members of the government felt that it would be alright to follow the will of the population.

  2. To what extent were economic conditions the predominant factor in the proliferation and manifestation ...

    As in many European states at the time, namely Britain, the effects of the momentous industrial revolution resulted in an exponential increase of the working class in Germany, as manual labor became essential to utilize the novel production techniques and concepts.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work