• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent was Imperialism the key cause of World War One ?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

To what extent was Imperialism the key cause of World War One ? The 19th century was witness to some incredibly powerful and far reaching change. By the late 19th century not only had the geo-political face of Europe radically changed, but the forces of Nartionalism, Imperialism and Militarism were influencing events that would ultimately lead up to the outbreak of the Great War. Imperialism can be defined as 'the policy of extending the rule or authority of an empire or nation over foreign countries, or of acquiring and holding colonies and dependencies'. This could be taken to include events within Europe itself, as much as those on the edge and outside European boundaries. However, the varied significance of each of these forces' role in causing the Great War, notably the role of Imperialism, can be debated. Imperialism was, in a number of ways, a significant cause of WW1. Much of the change in general European relations can be dated to the implementation of Weltpolitik. As Germany moved towards the more aggressive and expansionistic attitudes under Wilhelm II's chancellors, many European countries began to fear Germany's intentions and feel antagonistic towards her. Britain in particular felt threatened due to the competition created by the naval race. ...read more.

Middle

Britain's status as the number one power was absolutely linked to her empire as much as her industry. The rise of the imperialistic ambitions of European nations before the war can therefore be linked to the force of nationalism. Nationalism also lay at the heart of French hostility towards Germany, having lost Alsace-Lorraine in 1871. Germany's Weltpolitik was also inspired by a desire to make herself as great a world power as Britain. Nationalism was also one of the factors that led to the Dual Alliance between Austria-Hungary and Germany. However, the role of nationalism was of most significance in the Balkans. Fearing the strength of Pan-Slavism, and especially the impact it might have on her nationalistically divided empire, Austria-Hungary felt compelled to expand her influence in the region (such as the annexation of Bosnia). This in turn provoked a nationalistic response from the Slavs, supported by their fellow Slavic nation; Russia. The spark that led to WW1 was caused by the nationalistically inspired assassination of Franz Ferdinand, which gave Austria the excuse she needed to 'resolve' the problem of Slav nationalism further. Supported by the nationalistically driven aims of Germany, the ultimatum was nothing but a pretext for war. ...read more.

Conclusion

Much of the mistrust between nations was due to ther aggressive, expansionistic nature of much European nationalism. However, the rise of Militarism, the belief that it is necessary to have strong armed forces and that they should be used in order to win political or economic advantages, was only going to make a difficult job impossible. The growth of military power, both naval and land based, could only be regarded with suspicion and fear. Nevertheless, it was militarism that helped to hamper negotiations, but wasn't the key reason for war. In conclusion, it is clear that imperialism was a significant cause of the war, however, it was the changing geo-political situation post 1871 that set the scene into which the force of nationalism in particular, with the closely linked force of imperialism came into play. The aggressive and expansionistic nature of these forces led to rivalry, and when linked with militarism as well, fear. These factors would lead to the medium and short term causes of the war. However, of the three principal causes, imperialism was the least important, as the roots of New Imperialism lay largely with nationalism, a force when combined with the geo-political challenges of the time, ensured that a peaceful resolution of these rivalries and conflicts was tragically not forthcoming. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate History section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate History essays

  1. To What Extent Were Hitlers Policies the Cause of World War II?

    The German military was since the days of the Kaiser a source of national pride for the German people; however the restrictions imposed on it by the treaty of Versailles like the banning of an air force and only allowing 100,000 ground troops after World War I were considered humiliating and a source of discontent for the Germans.

  2. What Effect Did World War II have on Eastern Europe?

    For the next several decades, artists' creativity was stifled. Many communist artists emerged, promoting the propaganda of the ruling communist party. Any material that deviated from the communist party's beliefs was strictly prohibited11. However, an advantage was that libraries were opened in every village.

  1. To what extent was the arms race the key cause of the Cold War?

    But, it was nuclear power and space dominance that the new superpowers were aiming for, to prove themselves as the only power. The Nuclear Arms race actually began during the Second World War when the USA and Germany each began to research to build an atomic bomb.

  2. To what extent did the Prague spring weaken Moscow(TM)s hold over Czechoslovakia, and Eastern ...

    under communist rule for his philosophy for "truth and inner freedom" in order to realise truth19. In this sense freedom of thought matured rapidly within Czech society unlike in the Weimar Republic where it resulted in nothing but utter chaos.

  1. Assessing the view that the outbreak of World War One was the responsibility of ...

    This too triggered off a chain reaction as the Kaiser pressurized the already quite weak Austria-Hungary into declaring war with Russia on August 6, 1914. This in itself led to the escalation of the local conflict between Austria-Hungary and Serbia launching Europe into the First World War.

  2. To what extent did militarism contribute to the origins of the First World War ...

    The July crisis followed the Assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand. It was a diplomatic crisis between the major European powers and it was also greatly attributed to the tangled webs of alliances in Europe at the time. Austria-Hugary approached Germany for support against Serbia, but Russia was allied to Serbia which automatically involved Russia in the war.

  1. Notes on the History and Development of the Arab-Israeli Conflict

    By 1981 Begin had brought the number of Jewish settlers in the OTs to around 110,000. - If an area was considered 'too Arab' in character it would often be settled, and therefore the settlements were often established in heavily populated Arab areas.

  2. The Causes of WW1. First World War caused by MANIA: Militarism - Alliances ...

    to the North Sea while Britain built new naval bases for the Dreadnoughts in northern Scotland. For centuries the powers of Europe had clashed over their competing interests around the globe. During the nineteenth century, they usually reverted to diplomacy to sort through their differences, but in the early twentieth

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work