• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent was Israeli foreign policy from 1949 to 1967 only reactive?

Extracts from this document...


To what extent was Israeli foreign policy from 1949-1967 only reactive? In 1949 Israel and the surrounding Arab countries started negotiating armistices after the 1948 war, or the war of independence as the Israelis named it. In the time between this armistice and the ceasefires ending the Six Day War in 1967 Israeli foreign police went from being reactive developing into a more and more active policy. During the 1948 war around 550-600,000 Arabs fled from Israel (Gilbert, page 47). Around 280.000 of those into The West Bank and became refugees. The following years the refugees made guerilla forces called the fedayeen. The fedayeen groups attacked Israel during the night with the aim of harvesting fields, reunited with family, or to make sabotage. October 14th 1953 Ben Gurion reacted to the fadeyeen attacks with the Quibya raid where 69 people were killed including kids and women. The raid was very aggressive and it was denounced by the US, but it was still part of the reactive foreign policy in Israel, it was a reaction to the continuing fadeyeen raids. ...read more.


(Shulze, page 25) And Nasser did get MiGs. Nasser also decided to nationalize the Suez Canal and to close the strait of Tiran which left Israel with no connection to the red sea. So instead of negotiating the closure of the strait and because of Gurion being outraged about the Czech arms deal Israel decides to engage in the Sevres protocol with France and Britain. France who thought that Egypt was aiding the rebels in the French occupied Algeria wanted to remove Nasser from his powerful position in Egypt. Britain and Anthony Eden wanted Nasser removed because of the nationalization of the Suez Canal and because of Eden's interpretation of Nasser being the new Hitler. Ben Gurion with his aggressive approach had won over the diplomatic Sharett and he agreed to participate in the Sevres protocol. Therefore Israel attacked Egypt October 29th 1956. This action could be seen as a reaction to the Czech arms deal and the closure of Tiran but it was a preemptive attack, and it was Israel who took military in use. ...read more.


The fact that Nasser only asked for partial withdrawal confirms this. Israel chose to interpret this as an act of war and they launched their preemptive attack June 5th1967. This was a very active move and it confirms that Israeli Foreign policy was not reactive. Israel attached so they would not be the ones attacked, so they were not the ones who had to react. Israel's foreign policy started out being reactive with the Quibya and Gaza raid, but as she realized how powerful a military she had the foreign policy became more active with the Lavon affair and the Sevres Protocol. The foreign policy was more reactive than the Egyptian with all the fedayeen raids, but it is wrong to describe it as only reactive. The Sevres Protocol is a really good example of how active the foreign policy was - Israel engaged in covert operations and preemptive attacks. Also during the Six Day War Israel had a very active foreign policy. She attacked first and showed off her military superiority and in this way developed her foreign policy to a more active than reactive one. ?? ?? ?? ?? Emilie S´┐Żnderup History HL October 10th ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate History section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate History essays

  1. Effects of Nasser on Egyptian Society

    This explains why Nasser saw the Land Reform as the act that gave his Revolution Command Council (RCC) identity and transformed his coup to a revolution. The Land reform had of course a big impact on the Society, as the rich upper class of major land owners did not exist anymore and so the simple farmer obtained more power.

  2. To what extent can Mussolini(TM)s foreign policy be described as a failure?

    Therefore, in this essay, to say that Mussolini's foreign policies "failed" would be to say that he did not fulfil his idealistic expansionist aims, or achieved them, but at a very high price to Italy or that through his foreign policies, he failed to gain mass support and keep himself in power.

  1. British Foreign Policy Failures in the Palestine Mandate

    We shall surrender our well-earned rights for better ones. We shall relinquish none of our cherished customs; we shall find them again." 5Here Herzl highlights the passion which the Jews felt at the time in late 19th and early 20th century towards the creation of a separate Jewish homeland which would rid the Jews of their endless persecution from all the nations of the world.

  2. Hitler's Foreign Policy

    This was one of his favorite techniques, to act boldly while soothing his opponents with the sort of conciliatory speeches he knew they wanted to hear. Next, Hitler signed a ten-year non-aggression pact with the Poles. This was something of a triumph for Hitler; Britain took it as further evidence

  1. Bismarcks diplomatic policy

    Following the death of the childless King Frederick of Denmark and ruler of the Duchies of Schleswig and Holstein, in November 1863, there was a great deal of unrest over his heir. Christian of Glucksburg was the stated heir, but the government of Holstein refused to follow him and instead the son of the Prince of Augustenburg claimed the Duchies.

  2. Extended Essay - "to what extent was Yellow journalism to blame for instigating the ...

    American War and concerning it was that between Frederic Remington and William Randolph Hearst, the owner of New York Journal. Hearst had sent Remington and reputed writer Richard Harding Davis to Havana, Cuba in January of 1897 in order to capture the turmoil and tribulations resulting from the Cuban Revolutions and promoting his paper with the vivid, often exaggerated stories.

  1. To what extent was the advent of the Cold War an outcome of Stalin(TM)s ...

    Too often Stalin, as an aggressive dictator, was blamed for the deterioration in East-West relation and eventually the advent of the Cold War. Stalin's policies, in particular, were accused of upsetting the Alliance by defying mutual agreements, such as the Atlantic Charter of 14th August 1941.

  2. Notes on the History and Development of the Arab-Israeli Conflict

    - Plan Dalet- implemented in May 1948 by the Haganah, claimed to be defensive in nature, but Ahron Breginan asserts that it became a blank check for Jewish forces to expel Arab Palestinians, as was carried out in the ensuing days of the war.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work