To what extent was Johnsons presidency (1963-69) a failure?

Authors Avatar

To what extent was Johnson’s presidency (1963-69) a failure?

Lyndon B. Johnson was sworn into presidency in 1963 due to the assassination of his predecessor John F. Kennedy. There was a major difference between the two as Kennedy was said to be “articulate and charismatic” whereas Johnson was “a poor speaker and lacking in charm.” This character trait contributed greatly to his failure in presidency which will be discussed further on in this essay. Johnson had several similarities in ideologies with Kennedy, yet he was different in various ways as well. There are several reasons as to why Johnson’s presidency can be considered as a failure.  *

In 1960, Johnson already had presidential ambitions however he failed to win nomination from his party. When he became president he wanted to continue with Kennedy’s work on the New Frontier which included aims in tackling poverty, improving education and healthcare and to help African Americans. He wanted to do all this and more which was why he later decided to create the ‘Great Society’ which focused mainly on the environment and education acts. In a speech in March 1964, he addressed the goals of the ‘Great Society’ which were to provide children with knowledge and to let man “renew contact with nature.” Johnson knew he had to act quickly, therefore, he launched a huge legislative programme where more than 60 pieces of legislation were passed by the 89th Congress. These included eleven conservation bills, four education bills, ten health measures an increase in social security and minimum wage etc. Furthermore, he passed the Tax Reduction Act which cut taxes by $10 billion, this helped boost the economy hence boosting the employment rate as the GNP increased by 7% in 1964, 8% in 1965 and 9% in 1966. Also, the unemployment rate dropped by 5%, these successes in the American economy were however due to Kennedy’s tax reduction bill that were pushed through by Johnson. Despite the fact that these may appear to have been successful on President Johnson’s part, there was a huge slow down in working on the Great Society. Meanwhile, the opposition was growing, along with several critics, on the right, who argued that his aims for the programmes were much too expensive, failed to produce the results that were wanted and created an inefficient bureaucracy. On the other hand, the critics on the left were arguing about the best way to achieve Johnson’s goals. The main evidence used to identify the Great Society as a failure was the outbreak of riots in several cities in the USA.

Join now!

Johnson aimed to decrease the threat from Communism as he wanted to continue Kennedy’s policies. Johnson also aimed to follow Franklin Roosevelt’s New Deal, which helped him to develop the ‘Great Society’.

Another reason why the Great Society was not so successful was because the idea of change and reform was not so desirable anymore, and by 1966 people were tiring of it as the idea of liberalism had dominated politics since 1965. Most people began to see the faults and weaknesses in the policies that were put forth by Johnson. Several complained that he had set high expectations ...

This is a preview of the whole essay