• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent was Napoleon III responsible for the unification of Italy?

Extracts from this document...


To what extent was Napoleon III responsible for the unification of Italy? Napoleon III's contribution to the unification of Italy was decisive but inadvertent. He was somewhat indirectly responsible as his decisions played an important role in the unification of Italy. However, Napoleon III was not the only actor responsible; Count Camillo di Cavour, the prime minister of Piedmont, also unintentionally led to such unification. Napoleon and Cavour had no intention of unifying Italy; Cavour was interested in Piedmontese augmentation, while Napoleon was concerned with French interests and personal glory. While Napoleon's decisions and motivations led to Italian unification, Cavour's participation also contributed to the formation of the Italian state. Napoleon's motives played a crucial part in his desire to occupy himself with the Italian question. It was his personal ambition to glorify his name that led Napoleon to misleadingly support the idea of a united Italy. In order to achieve unification, Italy would have to rid itself of Austrian control. Napoleon saw this as a golden opportunity; Austrian power had prevented any French influence over the Italian peninsula and if he were to aid Italy in the disposal of Austrian power over Italy, he could then apply his own influence over Italy. ...read more.


Austria was defeated by Prussia and could no longer hold Venice. Prussia had pressured Austria to hand over Venetia to Italy, but Austria refused to do so directly; instead, it handed it over to France in order to humiliate Italy by dismissing it and not recognizing it as a power. It ceded it to France, and Napoleon III handed his acquisition to the Italian government. It was Napoleon's decision to give Venetia to Italy, and this was yet another vital step towards Italian unification. The deterioration of Franco-Prussian relations was another disreputable contribution to Italian unification. War erupted between the two, and Napoleon withdrew his troops from Rome to fight Prussia. France was defeated and the empire collapsed. Napoleon's defeat led the Sardinian King Victor Emmanuel to make military preparations for Rome because French troops were no longer there to control the city. Italian troops entered Rome after the Pope refused to negotiate yet again, and he surrendered. Rome was added to the kingdom and instantly became the new capital. The brief withdrawal of Napoleon III's troops from the city of Rome had involuntarily completed the geographical unification of the kingdom of Italy. ...read more.


Some consider that Cavour played a bigger role in Italian unification than Napoleon III did, but unity would not have taken place if it were not for Napoleon. The French emperor provided Sardinia with diplomatic and military support and without it Cavour would not have been able to defeat Austria in 1859. Napoleon also took part in the cession of Lombardy to Piedmont as he met with Franz Joseph, the Austrian emperor, to negotiate peaceful outcomes; Napoleon had convinced Franz Joseph to give up Lombardy. Napoleon III helped Sardinia acquire Venetia as well seeing that after the Austro-Prussian war, Venetia was handed over to Napoleon who in turn gave it to Cavour. Both Cavour and Napoleon III played crucial roles in the unification of Italy. Austrian influence could not have been eliminated from northern Italy without the massive amount of military aid provided by France. The removal of the French garrison from Rome was not a result of Napoleon's desire to see Italian unification but was rather forced upon him as the Franco-Prussian war broke out. He had helped expel Austria, expand Piedmont, and contributed to the creation the Kingdom of Italy. Cavour was also responsible for Italian unification; had he not unified the northern and southern parts of Italy, the creation of Italy would not have happened. ?? ?? ?? ?? Yosra Salaheldin ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate History section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate History essays

  1. Italian Unification: True Father of Italy

    Mazzini believed they had been insufficiently committed and had expected countries, such as France, to do their work for them. Mazzini called on the Italian people and, in particular, the young people, to prove themselves worthy of their destiny, to educate themselves and to fight for a 'free independent republican nation' (Morris, 257).

  2. Unification of Italy

    Trevellian said: "1848 was a turning point in history, when history failed to turn". The risings of 1848 failed because of a number of different reasons. First of all the rebels were uncertain of their aims and not everyone was inspired by the ideas of nationalism and liberalism.

  1. Italian Unification Revision Notes. Italian Politics in 1815

    How could they generate support from wealthy figures, while he wished to see a redistribution of wealth? How could they appeal to individual Italian rulers, while his ideal was republicanism? Mazzini might on occasions appeal for the support of particular rulers, but the ambivalence of his thought on this issue must surely have made them weary.

  2. Notes on Italian unification - background and main events

    It crushed the resistance in each state as it went and all the previous rulers were restored - Giuseppe Mazzini (1805- 1872) had been a Carbonaro but the events of 1830-1831 made him leave the Carbonaro. He also felt that the Carbonaro were traitors - Mazzini called on Charles Felix to lead efforts to remove Austria from Italy.

  1. French Revolution and the rise of Napoleon - revision notes

    Decree of August the 4 th and Declaration were innovations, which Louis XVI refused to sanction (poprzec). Jean-Paul Marat -> supported the king, he thought, that he is still capable to reign. 5 th October 1789 -> an armed crowd of 7 thousands men marched toVersailles, followed by the National Guard of Paris.

  2. Analyse the political factors involved in the unification of Italy up to 1861

    It did not last long.Metternich's troops moved into the Papal States and defeated the rebels. Farmer reveals that similar uprisings took place which were supressed in the same way by the same ruler; Metternich. These were the failures of the 1930's revolutionaries.

  1. History IA -Napoleon

    Blood Lust As the nobility and the monarchs, King Louis and Queen Marie Antoinette, continued to make fatal errors in their ruling of the country, the bourgeoisie and the paupers slowly became enraged. Bread prices were rising through the country, and the third estate was starving.

  2. History Essay (Bismarck's Influence on the German Unification

    A final, but important thing to note in terms international relations, was that Austria had no allies by 1860, a statement that will be researched in more detail under external circumstances and Bismarck?s diplomatic skills. Sub-Conclusion Internal circumstances provided the actual framework by which Otto von Bismarck could work toward

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work