• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To What Extent Was Stalin's Regime Based On Terror

Extracts from this document...


To What Extent Was Stalin's Regime Based on Terror? At the time of Stalin's regime the feelings regarding the Soviet leader were very mixed. Masses loved him but others despised him and one of the key causes for that disregard towards him was his violent and ruthless manner of ruling. Today, this question is still of great relevance as both Vladimir Putin and Stalin's grandson are, of sorts, trying to rehabilitate Stalin. They are of the opinion that Stalin was also a great leader and he did not solely base his regime upon terror. To what extent are they correct in believing this? Many still believe that Stalin deserves to be referred to as nothing more than a mass-murdering tyrant. To answer this question, I will need to look at evidence both supporting and denying the possibility that Stalin's regime was indeed based on terror. I will also be looking at different areas of Soviet Russia at the time and considering to what extent terror played a part in these areas. Perhaps Stalin's best-known policy was the collectivisation of all farms in the USSR. Stalin triumphed in collectivising well over 90% of all farms and, from the outside, this looked positive and promising. There is no doubt that Stalin made use of a considerable amount of terror in the domain of agriculture. This may have been considered necessary as one of Stalin's agricultural aims was to get rid of the kulaks as a class ('dekulakisation'). ...read more.


Stalin's workers were also forced to work using quotas that were amounts of work that they had to attain in a certain amount of time. Each person had a different quota depending on their ability but every miner or factory worker had to meet these or they would be punished with fines, deportation or humiliation. The Shakhty trials were used as a means of terrorising the workers because they were evidence of what happened to workers that were accused of 'resistance to the Plan' (Lynch). So many workers worked under fear, indicating a certain amount of terror used in industry as well. However, Stalin was also very eager to encourage good work. The Stakhanovites were an elite of workers that were heavily rewarded for their outstanding performances in the workplace and they were hence used as an example to others. Stalin used positive support in many other ways in industry. In fact, it could be argued that it was the basis of his industrial programme. His Fiver-Year Plans were key as they allowed each person to have their own targets or quotas. This made the task much more manageable for each person. Stalin believed that organisation would be key to success in industry. In fact, GOSPLAN, the organisation that set the quotas for everyone had over half a million employees! Stalin tried to encourage more and more to join the workforce. ...read more.


Perhaps he felt that this was the fastest and most efficient means of obtaining what he thought best for the USSR at the time. He did in fact claim that, in terms of its industry and agriculture, Russia was fifty to a hundred years behind Western Europe. He then said, "We must make up this gap in ten years. Either we do this or they crush us." And, sure enough, in 1939, just short of ten years after the speech, Germany and the USSR went to war. There is very little doubt that, without the rapid industrialisation that Stalin put the USSR through, Germany would have succeeded in invading the Soviet Union. So was Stalin right in doing what he did. Could the consequences have been much worse if Stalin hadn't ruled how he had done? Was he aiming for 'a greater good'? Also, was Stalin not bound to using terror as one of his methods because of the conditions under which he was trying to rule? It is important to remember that Russia was, and still is, a huge country with a huge variety of people and climates across it and that it has always been extremely difficult to rule, as the many previous rulers and Tsars could testify to. Also, socialism was a very controversial idea at the time and Stalin would have been trying to install something that was comparatively new. Lenin, who was doing a similar thing whilst he was ruling, also used terror as a means of keeping control in the USSR. ?? ?? ?? ?? Sam ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate History section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate History essays

  1. Stalins Purges

    The Five Year Plan, with its large scale nationalization and state control would get rid of the detested Nepmen, those private business owners and traders who survived under the NEP. As people who made a profit from their trade, the Nepmen were seen as capitalists, class enemies who presented a reminder of the old world and its values.

  2. Rise of Castro and Stalin

    Stalin and Castro's political manoeuvring continued to their removal of their opponents. Oppenheimer continues to describe how Castro's emasculation of the authority of the government led to the resignation of Premier Miro. Castro then displaced President Urrutia with the use of a political coup, after which he destroyed the revolution movement that had fought for democracy.

  1. Interwar Years: 1919-39

    * Indeed this crisis was different from the periodic recessions of before in that it lasted much longer and economic output fell much more sharply. * In 1931-33, a banking crisis hit the USA and many parts of Europe, as thousands of banks collapsed.

  2. USSR under Stalin

    and have close views on collectivisation as being brutal, violent, it involved a lot of terror and was forcefully imposed over the peasants. Source C is like supplementary to Source B and goes more into details about collectivisation as it explains who is called a kulak and for what reasons

  1. How and why did Mussolini set up a dictatorial regime in 1922-1927?

    In December of 1922, Mussolini established the Fascist Grand Council: although it had no legal status, it was to gradually take over the functions of the cabinet in the years to come. The nest few years showed that Mussolini, like Hitler was an opportunist, and a lucky one at that, and by 1925, he was a dictator of Italy.

  2. To what extent was William Is conquest and rule of England due to force?

    However, it was these very areas where control was established early after his coronation, showing a strong correlation between the level of control and the amount of force used. This correlation influenced William greatly, almost too greatly, as it lead to the Harrowing of the North and the killing of thousands of innocent sibilinas.

  1. Hitler vs. Stalin: Who is a more destructive leader in terms of religious groups?

    (Kimel, Direct Causes of the Holocaust). This excerpt shows the mental health problem Hitler was facing. Many believe that this medical condition was the cause of the Holocaust. The cause of the Holocaust is also blamed on many other factors, "such as anti-Semitism, Demonization, Versailles Treaty, and economic displacements of the Weimar Republic."

  2. IB History HL, Extended Notes: Russia, the Tsars, the Provisional Govenment and the Revolution.

    Reduction in hours women worked at night and payment in kind. Nobles 1. 1885 Nobles? Land Bank. Effects 1. 1881 Serfdom law as only applied to 37 ?internal provinces? and only affected about 15% of former serfs. Allotments made compulsory and redemption reduced.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work