• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To What Extent Was Stalin's Regime Based On Terror

Extracts from this document...


To What Extent Was Stalin's Regime Based on Terror? At the time of Stalin's regime the feelings regarding the Soviet leader were very mixed. Masses loved him but others despised him and one of the key causes for that disregard towards him was his violent and ruthless manner of ruling. Today, this question is still of great relevance as both Vladimir Putin and Stalin's grandson are, of sorts, trying to rehabilitate Stalin. They are of the opinion that Stalin was also a great leader and he did not solely base his regime upon terror. To what extent are they correct in believing this? Many still believe that Stalin deserves to be referred to as nothing more than a mass-murdering tyrant. To answer this question, I will need to look at evidence both supporting and denying the possibility that Stalin's regime was indeed based on terror. I will also be looking at different areas of Soviet Russia at the time and considering to what extent terror played a part in these areas. Perhaps Stalin's best-known policy was the collectivisation of all farms in the USSR. Stalin triumphed in collectivising well over 90% of all farms and, from the outside, this looked positive and promising. There is no doubt that Stalin made use of a considerable amount of terror in the domain of agriculture. This may have been considered necessary as one of Stalin's agricultural aims was to get rid of the kulaks as a class ('dekulakisation'). ...read more.


Stalin's workers were also forced to work using quotas that were amounts of work that they had to attain in a certain amount of time. Each person had a different quota depending on their ability but every miner or factory worker had to meet these or they would be punished with fines, deportation or humiliation. The Shakhty trials were used as a means of terrorising the workers because they were evidence of what happened to workers that were accused of 'resistance to the Plan' (Lynch). So many workers worked under fear, indicating a certain amount of terror used in industry as well. However, Stalin was also very eager to encourage good work. The Stakhanovites were an elite of workers that were heavily rewarded for their outstanding performances in the workplace and they were hence used as an example to others. Stalin used positive support in many other ways in industry. In fact, it could be argued that it was the basis of his industrial programme. His Fiver-Year Plans were key as they allowed each person to have their own targets or quotas. This made the task much more manageable for each person. Stalin believed that organisation would be key to success in industry. In fact, GOSPLAN, the organisation that set the quotas for everyone had over half a million employees! Stalin tried to encourage more and more to join the workforce. ...read more.


Perhaps he felt that this was the fastest and most efficient means of obtaining what he thought best for the USSR at the time. He did in fact claim that, in terms of its industry and agriculture, Russia was fifty to a hundred years behind Western Europe. He then said, "We must make up this gap in ten years. Either we do this or they crush us." And, sure enough, in 1939, just short of ten years after the speech, Germany and the USSR went to war. There is very little doubt that, without the rapid industrialisation that Stalin put the USSR through, Germany would have succeeded in invading the Soviet Union. So was Stalin right in doing what he did. Could the consequences have been much worse if Stalin hadn't ruled how he had done? Was he aiming for 'a greater good'? Also, was Stalin not bound to using terror as one of his methods because of the conditions under which he was trying to rule? It is important to remember that Russia was, and still is, a huge country with a huge variety of people and climates across it and that it has always been extremely difficult to rule, as the many previous rulers and Tsars could testify to. Also, socialism was a very controversial idea at the time and Stalin would have been trying to install something that was comparatively new. Lenin, who was doing a similar thing whilst he was ruling, also used terror as a means of keeping control in the USSR. ?? ?? ?? ?? Sam ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate History section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate History essays

  1. How and why did Mussolini set up a dictatorial regime in 1922-1927?

    the crisis would tone down Mussolini and force him to curb the excess violent of his followers, with some still regarding socialism as the greater threat. On the other hand, the fascist 'ras', were angered by Mussolini's concessions, and called for a full fascist revolution.

  2. Rise of Castro and Stalin

    Both Castro's and Stalin's policies laid the foundation for which they gained popularity and rose within their respective single party states. A crucial aspect in the rise of both Castro and Stalin was their propaganda. The main difference between their respective propaganda lay in the fact hat Castro needed no

  1. USSR under Stalin

    are they chased whether Source B only mentions that the kulaks were divided into three categories and deported or killed according to the category they fall into. Both sources claim that collectivisation was a new concept for the Soviet society and began a new era for the country as ''collectivisation

  2. To what extent should the success of Stalin in the leadership struggle between 1924-1930 ...

    * 1926; Kamenev and Zinoviev removed from their positions13 - Stalin added loyal followers to Politburo (Voroshilov, Rudzutak, Molotov and Kuibyshev)14. * Trotsky, Kamenev, Zinoviev and Lenin's widow Krupskaya staged last protest of the left - attacked NEP, lack of debate - outnumbered by the police15.

  1. To what extent was William Is conquest and rule of England due to force?

    York greatly, The Harrying of the North ultimately had the desired effect- the north was tamed. The death of many English nobles in battle, plus the fact that William's followers expected to be rewarded for faithful and efficacious service, meant that much land would change hands.

  2. Stalins Purges

    -ECONOMIC REASONS Fear of invasion gave added weight to the economic reasons used to justify the Five Year Plans. Under the NEP industrial production, although improving, remained disappointing to many in the Communist Party. By 1926 pre-war levels of production had been reached in many sectors but production was nowhere near what it could have been.

  1. IB History HL, Extended Notes: Russia, the Tsars, the Provisional Govenment and the Revolution.

    Supported nobles who opposed Milyutin?s liberalization of the army and changes in recruitment in 1874. 4. In the ?party of action? previous to the Russo-Turkish war while Alexander tried to prevent Russ-Turkish conflict. 5. Stressed positive features of Russia?s past Alexander II had worked to end and pledged to reverse judicial reforms once he became Tsar.

  2. In what ways and with what results did Stalin modernise the USSR to 1941?

    Also, propaganda was used effectively as brochures, pamphlets and posters were distributed throughout the large industrial towns to boost the people's morale. Human examples were used as 'shining examples', to motivate other workers to exceed their set limits. Furthermore, Russian heavy industries were far below average, and Stalin felt that developing these industries were important.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work