To What Extent was the Treaty of Versailles a fair treaty that could keep the world in peace after WWI?

Authors Avatar by davidboy333 (student)

Historical Investigation:

To What Extent was the Treaty of Versailles a fair treaty that could keep the world in peace after WWI

Wai Chiu

Contents

A.        Plan of Investigation        

B.        Summary of Evidence        

C.        Evaluation of sources        

D.        Analysis        

E.        Conclusion        

F.        Bibliography        

  1. Plan of Investigation

The terms in the Treaty of Versailles have always been a very controversial topic to discuss. There have always been two schools of thoughts. On school believes that a harsh punishment could prevent Germany from creating any further tensions with the Allies while the other school supports the fact that the treaty was too unfair for the Germans and that it would only lead to further tensions in the future. They did not believe it would be a suitable solution for maintaining peace. For the Germans, being forced to accept sole responsibility for causing the WWI was a violation of honor and many other terms within the treaty outraged their population. The aim of this investigation is to look deeply into some of the terms of the treaty to see whether they were fair and equitable. The investigation will evaluate the degree to which the Treaty of Versailles was a fair treaty that could bring peace to the world.

The sources selected for this investigation will be books, articles and videos related to the topic and they will be analyzed deeply and carefully.

  1. Summary of Evidence

On 28th June 1919, the Treaty of Versailles which was considered harsh by one school of thought and lenient by the others was signed. This treaty included 440 clauses which covered the following areas: war guilt, reparations, disarmament, territorial changes, mandates and punishment of war criminals. 

The ‘war guilt clause’ stated that Germany had to accept the sole responsibility for causing all the loss and damage of the war. The ‘war guilt’ provided justification for the Allied demands for reparations. The Allied wanted Germany to pay for the material damage done to them during the war and they also proposed to charge Germany for future costs of pension to war widows and war wounded. There was much argument between the delegates at the conference regarding the problem of the reparation. However in the end, Germany had to pay reparation of 32 billion US dollars which equals roughly 393 billion US dollars today. Germany’s economy at this stage was impossible to pay such a huge amount of indemnity. Therefore a great portion of the compensation took the form of coal, steel and agricultural products. In addition, Germany was forced to reduce its army to the lowest point compatible with internal security. They were not allowed to have air force, submarines, armored cars or tanks. It was only allowed to have a tiny navy with 6 battleships and a small navy with 100,000 men to provide internal security. No troops were allowed to stay in Rhineland and an Allied Army of Occupation was to be stationed in the area for 15 years.

Join now!

Some territorial changes were also made. Germany was forced to disclaim large area of its territory. They included Alsace-Lorraine which had been seized from France after the Franco-Prussian War in 1871; The Saarland was put under the administration of the League of Nations for 15 years, the coal extracted there was to go to France. All territories received by Germany from Russia under the Treaty of Brest-Litovsk were to be returned. Germany was also forced to give up its colonies; those in Asia including Shandong were given to Japan, Australia and New Zealand and those in Africa including Cameroons, Togoland and ...

This is a preview of the whole essay