• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To What Extent was the victory of the North in the United States Civil War due to its superior industrial resources and manpower?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

´╗┐To What Extent was the victory of the North in the United States Civil War due to its superior industrial resources and manpower? Faraz Ahmed pd:3 The civil war was like hell broke loose on earth. Many deaths and casualties occurred during this time period with endless blood battles. After the North and the South separated and became rivals, conflicts broke out between the two that played a role in damaging each side. Due to the differences in economy between the North and the South, the North had an upper hand. The North gained victory in the Civil war due to its Massive industrial resources with manpower and most importantly the turning point, the Battle of Gettysburg. The advantages of the North guided them through their industrial resources and manpower to over come challenges and win the civil war. ...read more.

Middle

Having such great manufacturing industries, the North was never short of a weapon because of the rapid production rate. The railroads tremendously helped the North in transporting weapons, men and ammunition. Because of the long distances and the amount it took to travel by foot, railroad would cut it more than half. This allowed the North to be prepared for attacks and always had resources under their hand for use. McPherson argued that south had the upper hand and they were playing offence, but still lost. South fought on their land and was suppose to protect it. Leading back to the cause, North?s industrial innovations and transportation efficiencies, the south lost and wasn?t able to keep up. One of the fierce battles that took place during the Civil War and was claimed the turning point was the Battle of Gettysburg, which ultimately aided the North to victory. ...read more.

Conclusion

After those slaves were free, many came and joined the Union in The Civil War. The North was aided by the joining of the slaves in their army because not only it helped them defeat the confederates, but also opened the eyes of many and showed them that slaves can do a lot more, and should be treated equally. This then added an objective of freeing slaves in the battle on uniting the states. Having slaves on the North?s side advocated their progress in the war and ultimately gave them victory As a result, The North?s victory had many factors to it, but the most important ones were the production of industrial resources and through that, the winning of major battles. The power to transport and produce modern weaponry aided the North in battles. Having a significant amount of men changed the whole battle around and forced South to face many difficulties. Due to the South?s passion for slavery, they lost the Civil War and ended up joining the Union and becoming a nation called the U.S.A. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate History section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate History essays

  1. The Chinese Civil War

    More and more city dwellers, fed up with the deepening economic crisis and Kuomintang corruption, turned to the Communists as China's only hope of reuniting the country and solving its pressing problems." (Tamura 183) Lastly, Mao and the Communists' complete dedication had led to the triumph of the CCP in

  2. To what extent was the Spanish American War of 1898 a turning point in ...

    The victorious Panamanians returned the favor to Roosevelt by allowing the US to control the Panama Canal Zone, and on November 18th 1903, the Hay-Bunau Varilla Treaty was signed.

  1. Industry vs Agriculture: The Economics Leading to the Civil War

    Summation of arguments- Thesis: The North and South were divided primarily by issues regarding slavery, tariffs and differences in industry. a. Slavery: The Southern economies were built on the labor of African American slaves. North was against slavery, South was for it. The south depended on slaves to produce cotton.

  2. Why did the Reds win the Russian Civil War?

    o They were located in a compact central region of Russia, and they were able to distribute their forces evenly and easily transfer their forces from one front to another with the help of their vast railway networks which branched out of Moscow.

  1. My research questions: did the United States of America really lose the Vietnam War ...

    This goal was a complete fiasco. At the end of the war people were protesting against war, instead of being proud of it. The war had fundamental effect on the U.S. society, which was traumatized by the memory of over 50,000 dead, the brutality of war which left hundreds of

  2. How valid is the claim that in 1914 states went to war due to ...

    However several factors had sapped British confidence. Grey wrote in is retrospect 'The real reason for going into the War was that, if we did not stand by France and stand up for Belgium against this aggression, we should be isolated, discredited and hated; and there would be nothing before

  1. What were the intentions of President Harry S. Truman and General Douglas MacArthur regarding ...

    At the Cairo Conference of 1943, the United States, the United Kingdom and Nationalist China agreed that "Korea should become free and independent 'in due course'" (Hastings 26). However, at the Potsdam Conference of 1945, the Allied powers unilaterally agreed on dividing Korea in contrast to the earlier Cairo Conference.

  2. To what extent is it fair to say that with the impact of the ...

    trade and public markets were restored.46 47 This resulted in three million peasants who had previously owned no land at all receiving some when the landlord's lands were redistributed.48 Some stability was reached, but the eradication of the other political parties continued, even more fiercely than before.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work