• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Treaty of Versailles & German Problem

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Assess the extent to which the Treaty of Versailles solved the "German Problem" in Europe. The Treaty of Versailles was signed on 28th June 1919. In article 231 it was stated that the responsibility for war was down to ' Germany and her Allies', and thus they were to accept the full cost of the war. While at the time many viewed the treaty as too harsh on Germany, believing that the Treaty would cripple them, others argue that it left them in a stronger position then before the war. Post revisionists like Sally Marks argue that the treaty was never enforced, and therefore any problems that negotiators had hoped to settle could not have been seen through. The "German Problem" refers to the threat that Germany posed to other European countries. France in particular was fearful of a German invasion, which they felt they could not survive. The Treaty was devised by the 'Big Three' all of whom had different aims. Clemenceau, the French Prime Minister, motivated by the devastating effects the war had on France (1.5 million military personnel lost, 400,000 civilians killed and damage to the French land) was intent on crippling Germany and ensuring that she would never be able to wage war again. ...read more.

Middle

While the sum was not decided at the Treaty of Versailles, it was later decided by the Reparations Committee in 1921 that Germany was to pay �6,600 million; this high figure was justified by the Allied by Article 231, which obliged Germany to accept full responsibility for the outbreak of the war. Historians use the collapse of the German mark in 1923 as evidence for the reparations being too harsh on Germany, and the "Big Three' attempting to forever cripple Germany. Altogether, Germany lost over one millions square miles of land and 6 million subjects and her colonies were passed onto Britain and France. The Treaty also took away 10% of Germany's industry and 15% of its agricultural land. British economist John Maynard Keynes argued that the coal and iron provisions were 'inexpedient and disastrous', leaving Germany with the ability to produce sixty million tons per annum, whereas in 1913 she has consumer 110 million tons. The use of protective tariffs (by France and Britain) was also said to have destroyed trade and the economic base of Germany, so that they could never recover. The Treaty did however, leave Germany powerful with the means to once again cause trouble. The treaty did not 'weaken Germany as much as the war weakened her European enemies and was 'relatively lenient' according to Niall Ferguson. ...read more.

Conclusion

The treaty was 'relatively lenient' and 'too weak to be a "Catharginian peace"'. The settlement would only provide security against a new German aggression with the cooperation of the German Government. If she refused to work with the allies in the execution of the treaty, then the treaty would not be enforced. Following the End of the war Germany remained the greatest powers in Europe. Once Germany recovered from the economic effects of the war she would pose a major threat to the other European powers and the settlement contained nothing that would effectively guard against this situation. Furthermore, Post-Revisionist historians like Ruth Henig and Elcock argue that 'the failure of the settlement did not lie so much in the deficiencies of their work as in what happened after 1919'. The fact that the Treaty of Versailles was never enforced meant that any problems the 'Big Three' had hoped to solve were left unchecked and Germany was left to do as she pleased. The treaty was one of compromise, and therefore there was little will to enforce it by the US and Britain. France the only country that desired the enforcement of the Treaty was in no position to do so. The US became disillusioned and chose to withdraw itself from European affairs, Britain came to see the peace as too harsh and favoured revision. Sarah Binks ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate History section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate History essays

  1. Assess the impact of the Treaty of Versailles on Germany, 1919-1930.

    * The German army was also drastically reduced in numbers, to become controllable by France. The Germans were no longer allowed to use conscription and could not have more than 100,000 troops. o In addition, the manufacturing of weapons was no longer prohibited not even its export or import.

  2. Condensed Treaty of Versailles

    who introduced the HIGH CONTRACTING PARTIES * Even though they recognize that labour policies differ by country, there should be a set number of rules for each countries labourers o Labour not to be looked at as just commodity or "article of commerce" o Employer and Employee to obey the

  1. Nazi Germany

    Nazis - sometimes they ignored it, sometimes they arrested them - these groups were not political opponents of the Nazis but they were opposing the Nazi control of their lives Women in Nazi Germany - Nazis were a very male-dominated organisation - According to Nazi view the role of a

  2. Notes on German unification - main events

    liberals - The Erfurt Union o The Erfurt Union was an attempt by Prussia to gain the leadership of Germany o Radowitz, the Prussian Chancellor proposed it and by this agreement of 1849, Prussia held the presidency of the Germany Confederation o This was only really possible because of the

  1. hrough an analysis of the consequences of the treaty of Versailles, it is made ...

    Out of that 13% lost of territory, Alsace-Lorraine was to be returned to France, Upper Silesia given to Poland, Danzig made a plebiscite and the formation of the Polish Corridor that split up Germany with the historic "East Prussia" - the birthplace of German nationalism, separated from the remainder of German territory.

  2. Treaty Versailles Essay

    1914 had been the second time that Germany had invaded France. The French were determined that this would never happen again so, they wanted to spilt Germany up and take away her economic and military ability to make war.19 The French in particular were very bitter towards their defeated German

  1. Mao and China Revision Guide

    Most of them were able to return home by the end of the 1970s, but most were unable to complete their education meant that their career paths and life chances had changed for the worse. The Cultural Revolution, led the reform in the post-Mao period to have gone as far and fast as it did.

  2. To what extent did the Treaty of Versailles reflect the original aims of the ...

    However, many of the 14 points were far too idealistic to be functioning considering the state of international relations in 1919. The original aims of the US conflicted with those of Great Britain and France. In particular, France wanted to impose harsh punishments on Germany that would guarantee her weakness

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work