• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Venezula Dictatorship

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Venezuela Military Dictatorship 1948 - 1958 Michelle Fan Roseanne Lim Cindy Zhou Block E 16 May 2008 Word Count: 1,806 Table of Contents Part A Introduction ...........................................................................................2 Part B Summary...............................................................................................3 Part C Evaluation.............................................................................................6 Part D Analysis................................................................................................8 Part E Conclusion...........................................................................................11 Part F Bibliography.........................................................................................12 Appendix I....................................................................................................13 Part A Introduction This investigation seeks to determine whether the military regime in Venezuela post World War II in 1948-1958 had impacted the country positively or negatively. To answer this question, political, social, and economic developments starting from the military coup of November, 1948 up until the fall of the military dictator Marcos P�rez Jim�nez in 1958, shall be evaluated. The analysis will then attempt to establish whether the military regime had indeed improved the national state. Two sources will be evaluated in depth: an interview with Rafael Caldera, Venezuelan president from 1969 to 1974, as written in Robert J. Alexander's book entitled The Bolivarian Presidents, and Winfield J. Burggraaff's The Venezuelan Armed Forces in Politics 1935 - 1959. Part B: Summary A. Background Information on the Military Regime - Was preceded by Acci�n Democr�tica until 1848 coup d'�tat - Acci�n Democr�tica was popular with the people but not with the military - Military was displeased with the amount of civilian involved in politics - Reluctant to restore democracy because military men thought they had superior organization and expertise, thus more fit to govern1 B. ...read more.

Middle

However, the source's high degree of subjectivity was a limitation . The interviewee, Rafael Caldera, a member of the government oppostion party, might have manipulated the truth in order to win public support and physical experiences could have influenced his memories. The interviewer also admitted that he didn't use a recorder during the interview although he had taken down notes immediately after the conversation. Some of the interviewee's key ideas might have been forgotten despite the short interval. Furthermore, the interview was originally conducted in Spanish and meanings were lost during translation. Historian Winfield Burggraaff's The Venezuelan Armed Forces in Politics 1935 - 1959, written in 1972, was used as a secondary source. The book illustrated the beneifts of the military dictatorship of 1948 - 1958. This source was valuable as different attitudes toward the regime were provided while most sources had criticized the dictatorship. Through another approach, readers could analyze the military regime through different interpretations. Burggraaff used governmental statistics and interviews to support his assertion. Governmental statistics provided raw facture evidence of the social trends in the military rule. These sources were more reliable than others as they were not meant for public disclosure. These records provided a candid glimpse into the inner-workings of the government. Futhermore, interviews demonstrated citizens' opinions of the military regime. However, public disclosure of governmental statistics could have been manipulated in order to maintain government image. ...read more.

Conclusion

As mentioned earlier, the opening up of the market provided a steady income for Venezuela. Jim�nez had used some of this many to construct public infrastructure. However, many public infrastructures constructed were of little use and sometimes became more of a burden.33 Social improvement attempts under the military dictatorship could be summarized as being merely for show without having a real purpose. The military dictatorship of 1948 to 1958 may or may not have conscientiously tried to improve Venezuela, but the end product was more often disadvantageous to the Venezuela public. Part E Conclusion In light of the evidence and evaluation, the military regime of 1948 to 1958 had not impacted Venezuela in a positive manner. Although Venezuela had indeed benefited economically from the opening of various markets, benefits of the economic growth fell under the hands of corrupt government officials instead of the citizens. Unemployment rates had indeed plummeted, but employees were treated harshly and worker union freedoms had been violated. Other political parties that had existed also proved useless as the dictator had the power to take precedence over the voting results and control the political fate of the country. The military regime must be acknowledged as an important stepping stone towards Venezuelan democracy, however the economical, social, and political changes during this period of dictatorship, which only seemed to improve the country's situation, did not really make much advancement when examined and analyzed carefully. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate History section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate History essays

  1. Italian Unification Revision Notes. Italian Politics in 1815

    This could only be done with foreign help. After 1852 he did his best to bring the Italian question into the forefront of European politics and to persuade Britain and France that Austrian misrule in Italy justified their intervention. � In 1855 Piedmont joined Britain and France in Crimean War against Russia.

  2. Mao Zedong: Dictatorship of a Single Party State

    politics, economy, organization, ideology of opposition * Cultural Revolution launched; ulterior motive - regain control of party after disastrous Great Leap Forward c. What role did propaganda and censorship play? * censorship not as significant as other dictators; Mao had already silenced opposition w/ fear of death via Hundred Flowers

  1. Why and with what success did Alexander 2 impose so many reforms?

    Keeping an army for a smaller number of years was more efficient and economical rather than keeping a million people standing. The changes in the military structure had certain implications on serfs that did not benefit the autocracy, as they could not allow free men to return home after 6 years well trained and good enough to start a revolution.

  2. Investigacin Histrica: En qu medida la expropiacin de tierras emprendida durante el gobierno de ...

    Ley que dio tierra a 50,000 feudatarios, entra en trance de desaparici�n final." [Ver Anexo 2] El gamonal no tiene poder para imponer cambios a la pol�tica global que se define en funci�n de los intereses hegem�nicos de los agro-exportadores y el capital extranjero."13 La ley de la reforma agraria

  1. Constitution and New Government

    No authority to stop slave trade for 20 years a. Large and difficult concession for anti-slavery activists, but without it, the constitution would fail f. Other issues not brought to agreement were left out for later years i. New courts allowed to review acts of legislature 1.

  2. Gender Equality in the Military

    to have military funerals.26 Disbandment The WASP was disbanded in 194427 having been told that "they'd never been more than civilians who did some flying."28 The women had gone from being praised as the vision of patriotism to being critiqued for holding men back.29 In 1944 Congress denied legislation that

  1. IB History HL, Extended Notes: Russia, the Tsars, the Provisional Govenment and the Revolution.

    1912 compulsory insurance for industrial workers. Cannot be seen as a step forward because 1. Fundamentally, Nicholas still regarded the Duma with contempt and not something he should have to cooperate with. Still autocratic worldview. 2. Government and Nicholas could still block legislative proposals they opposed.

  2. A look at the Differing Views of Jimmy Hoffa by the Government, the Public, ...

    ________________ Who Was Jimmy Hoffa? James Riddle Hoffa was in born Brazil, Indiana on February 14, 1913 (Russell 7). In 1931, eighteen-year-old Jimmy Hoffa and other warehousemen of a Kroger warehouse in Detroit decided to form a labor union. When two employees were unjustly fired, Hoffa and the newly-formed union

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work