• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Venezula Dictatorship

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Venezuela Military Dictatorship 1948 - 1958 Michelle Fan Roseanne Lim Cindy Zhou Block E 16 May 2008 Word Count: 1,806 Table of Contents Part A Introduction ...........................................................................................2 Part B Summary...............................................................................................3 Part C Evaluation.............................................................................................6 Part D Analysis................................................................................................8 Part E Conclusion...........................................................................................11 Part F Bibliography.........................................................................................12 Appendix I....................................................................................................13 Part A Introduction This investigation seeks to determine whether the military regime in Venezuela post World War II in 1948-1958 had impacted the country positively or negatively. To answer this question, political, social, and economic developments starting from the military coup of November, 1948 up until the fall of the military dictator Marcos P�rez Jim�nez in 1958, shall be evaluated. The analysis will then attempt to establish whether the military regime had indeed improved the national state. Two sources will be evaluated in depth: an interview with Rafael Caldera, Venezuelan president from 1969 to 1974, as written in Robert J. Alexander's book entitled The Bolivarian Presidents, and Winfield J. Burggraaff's The Venezuelan Armed Forces in Politics 1935 - 1959. Part B: Summary A. Background Information on the Military Regime - Was preceded by Acci�n Democr�tica until 1848 coup d'�tat - Acci�n Democr�tica was popular with the people but not with the military - Military was displeased with the amount of civilian involved in politics - Reluctant to restore democracy because military men thought they had superior organization and expertise, thus more fit to govern1 B. ...read more.

Middle

However, the source's high degree of subjectivity was a limitation . The interviewee, Rafael Caldera, a member of the government oppostion party, might have manipulated the truth in order to win public support and physical experiences could have influenced his memories. The interviewer also admitted that he didn't use a recorder during the interview although he had taken down notes immediately after the conversation. Some of the interviewee's key ideas might have been forgotten despite the short interval. Furthermore, the interview was originally conducted in Spanish and meanings were lost during translation. Historian Winfield Burggraaff's The Venezuelan Armed Forces in Politics 1935 - 1959, written in 1972, was used as a secondary source. The book illustrated the beneifts of the military dictatorship of 1948 - 1958. This source was valuable as different attitudes toward the regime were provided while most sources had criticized the dictatorship. Through another approach, readers could analyze the military regime through different interpretations. Burggraaff used governmental statistics and interviews to support his assertion. Governmental statistics provided raw facture evidence of the social trends in the military rule. These sources were more reliable than others as they were not meant for public disclosure. These records provided a candid glimpse into the inner-workings of the government. Futhermore, interviews demonstrated citizens' opinions of the military regime. However, public disclosure of governmental statistics could have been manipulated in order to maintain government image. ...read more.

Conclusion

As mentioned earlier, the opening up of the market provided a steady income for Venezuela. Jim�nez had used some of this many to construct public infrastructure. However, many public infrastructures constructed were of little use and sometimes became more of a burden.33 Social improvement attempts under the military dictatorship could be summarized as being merely for show without having a real purpose. The military dictatorship of 1948 to 1958 may or may not have conscientiously tried to improve Venezuela, but the end product was more often disadvantageous to the Venezuela public. Part E Conclusion In light of the evidence and evaluation, the military regime of 1948 to 1958 had not impacted Venezuela in a positive manner. Although Venezuela had indeed benefited economically from the opening of various markets, benefits of the economic growth fell under the hands of corrupt government officials instead of the citizens. Unemployment rates had indeed plummeted, but employees were treated harshly and worker union freedoms had been violated. Other political parties that had existed also proved useless as the dictator had the power to take precedence over the voting results and control the political fate of the country. The military regime must be acknowledged as an important stepping stone towards Venezuelan democracy, however the economical, social, and political changes during this period of dictatorship, which only seemed to improve the country's situation, did not really make much advancement when examined and analyzed carefully. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate History section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate History essays

  1. George Orwell in the Spanish Revolution

    If we look at the fascist states in his time in Europe: Germany and Italy, both were capitalist states. Under a fascist political system it is very much likely that comes an economic system of capitalism and so it does under a liberal republic (which is why he referred to all three terms).

  2. Italian Unification Revision Notes. Italian Politics in 1815

    � The Pope appealed to France, Austria, Spain and Naples for help. The decisive campaign was undertaken by 20,000 French troops Louis Napoleon, recently elected President of France, wanted to win domestic Catholic support by restoring the Pope. � Hopes that French troops would be welcomed by the Romans proved unfounded.

  1. Internal Assessment: Camp David and Oslo Accords

    right over East Jerusalem and their homeland, indicating his refusal to acknowledge Israel's existence * East Jerusalem was part of Israel's promise of "land for peace" * Israel refused to give up East Jerusalem * Arafat wanted control over the Haram al-Sharif * Clinton, US President, stated that both Palestinians

  2. Mao Zedong: Dictatorship of a Single Party State

    & rest of KMT flee to Taiwan b. With or without propaganda? What was the role of the general public? * propaganda not used in rise to power * Mao + CPC relied on rural proletariat (farmers) as heavy vein of support o gained through perseverance of Long March c. What role did propaganda or personal charisma play?

  1. To what extend does the number of deaths and debt during the construction of ...

    The Hay-Herran Treaty with Colombia would have given the United States the land and the right to build a canal across Panama, but Colombia refuses to ratifies the treaty.(Bushnell, 149) Mainly because they believed that the U.S could afford to pay more than 10 million, given that they had agreed to pay 40 millions to the French building company.

  2. Andrew Jackson - American politics in the 1820s and 1830s.

    The Cherokees refused and brought their case to Supreme Court. Although John Marshall, Chief Justice at the time, sided with the Cherokees in two cases (Cherokee Nation vs. Georgia and Worcester vs. Georgia), Andrew Jackson refused to comply with the Court's decision and is reputed to have sneered, "John Marshall has made his decision, now let him enforce it."

  1. IB History HL, Extended Notes: Russia, the Tsars, the Provisional Govenment and the Revolution.

    would appoint ministers, conduct foreign affairs, and have the right to rule by decree when the Duma was not in session. 3. Tsar?s agreement needed to pass laws making the Duma dependant on his approval. Composition of the Dumas 1.

  2. Notes on the History and Development of the Arab-Israeli Conflict

    Role in the Yom Kippur War and Camp David - In the 1970s, Soviet president Brezhnev and US President Nixon began a process of d�tente to lessen Cold War rivalry. This meant that the role of the USSR in the conflict declined, as they supplied fewer arms to the Arab states than previously.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work