• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Was germany to blame for WWI?

Extracts from this document...


Was Germany to Blame for World War One? Germany surrendered on the 11th hour of the 11th day of the 11th month of 1918. Although Germany was not defeated on the battlefield, its civilians were starving, its troops were demoralized, and the Generals saw no chance of victory. The peace negotiations were held at Versailles in France. When the Treaty of Versailles was written up, Clause 231 stated: "The Allied governments affirm, and Germany accepts, the responsibility of Germany and her allies for causing all the loss and damage to which the Allied governments and their peoples have been subjected as a result of the war." Germany was guilty for causing the war. But although Germany was forced to sign the Treaty of Versailles, it refused to accept the blame. Historians have argued about this issue ever since. Was Germany really guilty for causing WWI? Would the war have happened without Kaiser Wilhelm II's aggressive foreign policy? Or were there many other causes and countries who share the blame for the war? This essay will analyze the extent of Germany's responsibility in the outbreak of World War One. ...read more.


If it was really a cause not only Germany should have been blamed but also Great Britain. Although German-French relations were in trouble since the 1870 Franco-Prussian War, the Moroccan Crises of 1905 and 1911 nearly led to war between the great rivals. The Moroccan crisis was, from the French point of view a very unfair thing to do. France wanted to conquer Morocco but they didn't want the Germans to gain colonies in Africa so why could the French gain colonies and the Germans don't? But this Moroccan crisis at last didn't cause a war. Although when the First World War started both countries had anger and bitterness towards the other and this encouraged them to fight one against the other in a war that they didn't cause. Although Germany was blamed for the outbreak of the war, if it was according to the anger and bitterness left by the Moroccan crisis Germany and France would have to be blamed for the outbreak of the war, not only Germany. There were many long-term factors pushing Europe to war, but the spark that actually lit the flame was the assassination of Arch Duke Franz Ferdinand in Sarajevo, the capital of Bosnia (a part of Austria-Hungary) ...read more.


In response, another German historian, Gerhard Ritter claimed that Germany didn't have a plan for domination, and that is was only trying to support its main ally Austria Hungary and that the First World War was more the fault of the military than that of the German policy. Also he says that Germany's aim wasn't a war but to empower Austria Hungary, its only true ally. From my point of view, Ritter's thesis is more believable as he is trying to identify what really happened in the war without comparing anything to things that happened later in history. Nevertheless, I believe that Germany wasn't guilty for the outbreak of the First World War and that it shouldn't have been blamed just because they lost the war. I support this with what Ritter says that is a very intelligent and believable thesis that explains what really happened in the First World War. From my point of view, every country that participated in the war should have been blamed because they all caused damage and loss. But if there was just one country to blame I would say that the First World War was Serbia's fault because it was a Serbian terrorist who killed Franz Ferdinand and started the First World War. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate History section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate History essays

  1. Treaty Versailles Essay

    The Treaty of Versailles was made up of 440 clauses. Many of those clauses were very unnecessary. If the time was taken to read the entire Treaty of Versailles, some clauses would be found to have taken great advantage of Germany, almost wanting Germany to literally disappear or beg for mercy.

  2. The cold war - the conferences and the start of the cCold War

    53 workers were killed by the Polish army. Khrushchev moved troops to Poland's border. Poland gained a new leader called Gomulka. Gomulka made concessions to the Catholic Church but on the other hand, he was totally loyal to the Soviet Union. As a consequence, there was no direct Soviet intervention c)

  1. Britain in WWI

    The split also occurred in the government. At the time when war was inevitable, four senior members of the government, Charles Trevelyan, David Lloyd George, John Burns and John Morley were opposing the war and wanted to make the decision of England not participating official.

  2. Extended Essay - "to what extent was Yellow journalism to blame for instigating the ...

    This rivalry peaked from about 1895 to 1898, also the period of the Cuban revolutions. Yellow Journalism and it's power of persuasion was aimed at freeing Cuba during this period and it worked enough to instigate a armed military conflict between Unites States and Spain.

  1. Bismark's Germany

    � Offensive/attackers lacked sophisticated technology to pass the defensive weapons (barbed wire, trenches etc) � Few decisive battles, victories or causes - greatest error of modern history? � What did this war really accomplish? � French were invaded and had to defend their country "Over by Christmas" � All previous

  2. Was the outbreak of general war in 1914 inevitable after the assassination of Arch ...

    It also implied Austria-Hungary?s will to crush Serbia militarily in order to prevent a strong bulwark of Slavic nations under the leadership of Serbia. To the letter, Kaiser Wilhelm II answered that Austria-Hungary could ?rest assured that his Majesty will faithfully stand by Austria-Hungary, as is required by the obligations of his alliance and of his ancient friendship?.

  1. To what extent was Germany responsible for WWI?

    lead to a general war when Russia would be stronger, Germany would rather bring about a swift victory on the basis of a well-trained and well-equipped German army following a careful plan. Germany also sparked a crisis where he seemed to be challenging the colonial friendship treaty of 1904 between

  2. Notes on the History and Development of the Arab-Israeli Conflict

    Sadat's presence effectively recognised Israel and also Jerusalem as Israel's capital. In December, Israeli PM Begin visited Egypt. - Throughout 1978, thanks to US President Carter, the two sides moved closer together - In September 1978, at Carter's retreat Camp David, Carter, Begin and Sadat worked non-stop to achieve an agreement.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work