• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Was the American Revolution Revolutionary?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Oliver Diaz 12/19/11 Was the American Revolution Revolutionary? The relationship between colonists and the British was meant to be one based on cooperation. The economic system they relied on was mercantilism. Mercantilism provided a profitable system for both the colonists and England. The colonists were to collect and grow raw materials that were unavailable in England and sell them to England who would then turn them into manufactured goods, and sell them back to the colonies. However, England didn't have a strict policy to control the mercantile system with the colonies because they were pre-occupied with wars in Europe and they were separated by thousands of miles of ocean. Therefore, Parliament passed the Navigation Acts which were meant to maintain control and supervise mercantilism in the colonies. The Navigation Acts were effective in most colonies because tobacco was in abundance and the colonists knew that they would profit from the system as long as they followed orders. The British and the colonists had a cooperative relationship while this system was at its peak. The British relied on cooperation from the colonists because they knew that it was hard to control people who lived on the other side of the Atlantic. However, the Proclamation of 1763 shined some light on the British government for the colonists. The Proclamation made the British into "insensitive" people who were unable to effectively span the Atlantic through their governors (Jordan 86). Following the realization of Britain's inability to properly enforce their acts and laws, the colonists saw their position in the relationship differently. They began to stretch the constricting bands implemented by Britain that limited their ability to prosper. On the other hand, George Grenville, the British colonial minister, decided that the increasing amount of disloyalty and smuggling done by the colonists had to be counteracted, hence the arrival of the Sugar Act of 1764 (Jordan 87). Similarly, the Quartering Act was meant to force the colonists to pay for their protection provided by British troops but the colonists hadn't asked for the troops to be stationed in their states. ...read more.

Middle

The regulator movement was an effort made by farmers in North Carolina against wealthy officials. The Regulators were focused on preventing the collection of taxes and helped prevent the confiscation of landed (Zinn 64). According to Zinn, the American Revolution was not revolutionary. He believed that even when the colonists earned their independence they were experiencing the same problems. The nationalist elite who had fought against the British were stepping in and acting in the same way as their predecessors had. The political inexperience was a possible reason for the repeating problems but Zinn believes that mainly the men of property were able to profit once independence from Britain was obtained. The beginning of Zinn's argument is convincing because he plays devil's advocate and talks as if the American Revolution was revolutionary. He then breaks down the progress of the French, the Indians, and the British from the perspective of the colonies. The French and Indian war took care of the French and expelled them from North America; the Indians were kept on the opposite side of the Appalachians and that left the British (Zinn 59-60). The perspective changes and the British are now planning their restriction on the colonies. This was convincing because the colonies and British were working at the same time to expand their control without the other one knowing, which shows how their conflict began. Later in his argument, Zinn is convincing by showing how the American Revolution is not revolutionary without directly stating it. He shows how the nationalist elite were not entirely different from the pro-British elite. The crowd action that had been rallied by the nationalists suddenly seemed like it might backfire and negatively affect them (Zinn 65). This piece of evidence provides foresight and can help us assume how the nationalist elite will rule similarly when their time comes. Word Count: 795 According to "The Greatness of this Revolution" in Who Built America? ...read more.

Conclusion

The realization that they had established themselves enough to break off from their mother land became clear to the colonists and conflict ensued. The colonial trade amounted to 2,800,000 pounds for Britain and this significant income forced them to depend on the colonists. The crowds were the first to gather in order to resist Britain. However, the crowds consisted of miscellaneous colonists who all knew that Britain had no right to control them and their resistance was aggressive and not particularly effective. Between 1764 and 1765 New York saw 57 crowd retaliations, which would have been more effective if they had been organized, but alas the colonists had not yet learned of the importance of organization (Levine 138). Still, the ever persistent crowds did intimidate stamp distributors and even forced some of them to resign their posts. However, the main issue was the hesitancy of the colonists to join in the fight against Britain. Luckily, Thomas Paine came along and wrote Common Sense which spoke to all the social classes in the colonies and willingly committed treason against Britain. This was a significant shift in the minds of the colonists because the more colonists who would openly protest and resist Britain, the easier it would become. Thomas Paine set an example for his fellow colonists and helped show them that Britain should not control them anymore. The ideas of deference towards Britain that had once existed were crushed by pamphleteers, mainly Paine, and the colonies were changing. The revolutionary actions of the colonists, like committing treason, are what made the Revolution truly revolutionary. Lastly, the key to the revolution was the organization seen in groups like the Loyal Nine and the temporary Sons of Liberty and Daughters of Liberty. When the colonists joined together in organized groups that were meant to openly resist Britain, they showed a new cooperative ability and willingness to create something new. The mother land that had birthed them was now in need of their economy, but the American Revolution led to the birth of a new nation. Word Count: 451 ?? ?? ?? ?? 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate History section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate History essays

  1. Why did the British lose the American Revolution?

    Another mistake they made, was about the geography. The British were aliens in strange land. First of all 3,000 thousand miles lay between the Americans and Britain so sending resources was a hassle. A lot of time passed between getting more supplies from homeland, even though they may need those supplies immediately.

  2. Russia 1905 revolution

    But they had great differences on the means to achieve their goals. This revealed two opposing ideas concerning the personnel who would make the socialist revolution. The Bolsheviks, led by Lenin (Lenin's view had more support at the Congress, so his group was called the Bolsheviks (Majority Men)

  1. Revision notes - Causes of the French Revolution and the Development of the Revolution ...

    There was ready band of men and women keen to listen to and act on the words of the revolutionary speakers. The members of the crowd were known as the Sans Culottes since they wore long trousers. They consisted of a mixture of craftsmen, shopkeepers, small traders, clerks, wage earners,

  2. Was the Russian Revolution due more to tsars inadequacy as a ruler of the ...

    "On the city's main thoroughfare, Nevsky Prospekt, crowds shouted 'Down with the autocracy!' and 'Down with the war!' Here and there, mobs sacked food stores."18 Had Nicholas II been a competent ruler, those issues would not have occurred in the first place for the radical groups to use propaganda to sway the public.

  1. IB History HL, Extended Notes: Russia, the Tsars, the Provisional Govenment and the Revolution.

    Emancipation of the serfs 1. Nobility resented loss of 1/3 of their land (compensation usually went towards paying old debts)

  2. What was the main cause of the French Revolution?

    In fact it can be easily argued that ?kings are often a disgrace to their nation?[5] and ?the cry that led people to storm the Bastille is right out of the Social Compact?[6] However, it is necessary to recognise that the king did not so much to accentuate the problem;

  1. The History and Development of the American Dream

    Images are always more static, concrete and rigid than ideals. They do not have any connection with the past and lack useful pithiness. People are searching, finding, buying and enjoying things, goods, and brands and so on.

  2. Notes on the History and Development of the Arab-Israeli Conflict

    achieve such a comprehensive and decisive victory in the first Arab Israeli War." As a result of this, King Abdullah expected Israel to help him mobilise international support for incorporating the remains of Palestine into his Kingdom. These talks began in Dec 1948 and resulted in a major victory for Israeli diplomacy (although they had also used military force)

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work