• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Was the Tsar to blame for his own downfall?

Extracts from this document...


Was the Tsar to blame for his own downfall? In 1917, the great Russian Revolution took place overthrowing the Tsar and turning Russia into a republic. Bringing about the end of the Romanov Dynasty and the Tsarist system that had ruled Russia since 1613, the revolutions was a major turning point in Russian history. Historians have long debated who was in fact to blame for the significant event. Was it the Tsar Nicholas II himself who brought about his own downfall or were there other factors that contributed to the cause? There are several external factors that contributed to the downfall of the Tsar. First of all, "The Soviet View" argues that revolution was going to happen anyway. During the 19th century, Russia had endured great changes that began to question the Tsarist system such as the growth of capitalism in the 1890s with the "great spurt" under Witte, the chief minister. Between 1905 and 1914 Russian industrial production doubled. Industrialisation thus helped a working class emerge and soviets mantain that workers became class conscious and therefore revolutionary under the influence of the Bolsheviks. There was also political discontent bringing about an increase in strikes from 1912 showing the rise of the working class and their discontent with the system due to poor conditions in factories. ...read more.


Moreover, war made the transport system collapse as the improved railway system did not prove to be adequate for the demands of the war. People in St Petersburg became even more discontent and angry with the Tsar over this as they were far away from the food-producing regions. What made matters worse was that its population had increased due to the destitute refugees that were moving to the cities increasing demand for resources at a time were resources were scarce. The food intake of Petograd workers feel by a quarter and infant mortality rates doubled. Furthermore, Russia's heavy defeats against the world's best army during war such as the Battle of Massurian Lakes and Tannenberg badly affected the Tsarist government's reputation. War clearly undermined the Tsarist system. In fact, the Liberal View argues that if there had not been a war Revolution would never have come. Pavlovsky stated "Then, as a thunderbolt came the terrible catastrophe of 1914, and progress changed into destruction". The factors mentioned above convey that it was not the Tsar himself but rather the Tsarist system and the events that took place at that time that were to blame. The truth was that Russia due to its immense territory and ethnic diversity was difficult to reform and also difficult to rule. ...read more.


He also ignored the warnings from Michael Rodzianko who clearly told him that "Discontent is general and on the increase" and that the "formation of a new government was required". He, thus, did not accept the Duma's proposal to share government in time and when he finally did, Rodzianko told him it was simply too late for this concession. The actions of the Tsar and his government made even his closest and most loyal supporters turn against him. Even, the Tsar's cousin Prince Yusupov went against him and killed Rasputin in 1916. In 1917, at the eve of his downfall the Tsar was unaware of the seriousness of the situation and Alexandra disregarded warnings. In conclusion, although several external factors that aimed for the abolition of the Tsarist system were greatly to blame for the Tsar's downfall it was the Tsar's actions and incompetent nature that was mainly responsible for the revolution. His actions made his regime weak as he lost support from all his followers and from the army, his guarantor of stability. Although, war made things worse, it was only a catalyst to a revolution that was bound to happen due to the general discontent in the country. Without any support, the Tsar was made to abdicate his throne on 15th March 1917, bringing to an end his regime and the Tsarist system. ?? ?? ?? ?? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate History section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate History essays

  1. Russia 1905 revolution

    of the political parties: the right-wing Liberals disagreed with the radical Liberals, the Mensheviks disagreed with the Bolsheviks, and the moderate Social Revolutionaries disagreed with the radical Social Revolutionaries. The internal division within each party gravely weakened the strength of its struggle against Tsardom.

  2. China's socio-economic changes under Deng Xiaoping

    The commitment to further reform was affirmed, but its pace, and the emphasis to be placed on macroeconomic and microeconomic levers, remained objects of caution. Four Modernizations Deng Xiaoping initiated free-market reforms that transformed China's economy. Only 30 years later, China moved from being an economically desolate country into an industrial powerhouse, rapidly overtaking developed western nations in recession.

  1. Why did the Reds win the Russian Civil War?

    Therefore he Reds had full control of the tsarist army's stocks and key industrial centers of the country. Mandel, David. The Petrograd Workers and the Fall of the Old Regime. New York: St. Martin's Press, 1983. * The Allies' support for the Whites against the Reds had very little influence

  2. Prohibition: an inevitable failure?

    the top of the poster, there is a title: "The Poor Man's Club" - The most expensive in the world to belong to. There is no sophistry here- it means, plain and simply, that alcohol robs the buyers of their money.

  1. Was the Russian Revolution due more to tsars inadequacy as a ruler of the ...

    hemophilia.4 The monarchs despised Rasputin's influence on Alexandra and saw him as defilement to the Russian monarch because he was "a lover of alcohol and sex."5 So on December 16-17 of 1916, Prince Iusupov (son of the wealthiest woman in Russia)

  2. IB History HL, Extended Notes: Russia, the Tsars, the Provisional Govenment and the Revolution.

    Preserved peace throughout his reign except for minor fighting in Central Asia) but laid the foundations for the 1917 revolution. Central government and internal security Feature 1. 1881 defeat of proposals for constitutional reform after conferences Effects 1. Indication that he had no intention of completing Alexander II?s reforms 2.

  1. Notes on the History and Development of the Arab-Israeli Conflict

    this division between Maronites and Muslims: the President was always to be a Christian, the Premier a Sunni Muslim and the Speaker of the Parliament a Shiite Muslim - The Christians feared being overrun by the Muslims whilst the Muslims claimed that due to demographic change, they should have the

  2. Why did Tsarism fail to survive the first world war

    The outbreak of the war provided somewhat of an advantage for the Tsar. He was able to gain much popularity among the people and was a leading figure towards the fight against the invading German troops. The army was comprised of professional soldiers at the beginning of the war in

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work