Was World War One a Total War?

Authors Avatar

Was it a “Total War”? Define and conclusion

        A Total War can be defined as a conflict that encompasses a total mobilization of resources such as human, industrial, agricultural, military with an aim to have such an output that the enemy won’t be able to overcome. Perhaps the largest difference between a Total War and a normal war is that there is no difference between those who are fighting and the civilians; they are all seen as an enemy.

From this point of view, World War One could definitely be considered a Total War because it was a complete contrast to the limited wars of the 18th Century which were small, trying to avoid battles, not touching the society and continuing the trading systems.

        Firstly, WW1 had an all encompassing character which although it began with the Germans and Austrians fighting against Russia, Britain and France. Within a few months all other European powers such as Turkey, Italy, Rumania and USA ended up joining the war. What at first could have been only a small conflict in the Balkans region, due to the alliance system it became a total war because it suddenly involved everyone else in Europe. However the war stretched itself to colonies from these European powers such as campaigns in Africa in order for an intervention in this war.

Join now!

Unlike other wars, this war was not only on land, or only on sea, fighting took place simultaneously in land, sea, under the sea, and in air (aeroplanes and bombing). Actually it even went on to trying to destroy resources and means of trade from the other side, this total war had a much broader vision of how to destroy the enemy. It wasn’t just trying to kill the soldiers, it involved everyone. This new model of war was between nations, not only a quarrel between rulers, thus even civilians were badly treated by occupying powers such as night raids.

...

This is a preview of the whole essay