• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

What was the attitude of Austria to liberalism and nationalism in the first half of the 19th century?

Extracts from this document...


History Essay No. 1 Nicholas Larsen 2.U HL "What was the attitude of Austria to liberalism and nationalism in the first half of the 19th century?" 1 Word count: "What was the attitude of Austria to liberalism and nationalism in the first half of the 19th century?" : All Europe countries, except Great Britain, had an absolute rule, controlled by the nobles and a head of state who had supreme power above all, deciding the destiny of all citizens of the nation. The seat of power was always inherited by a relative of the former king; this could result in an incompetent ruler for the state, who could not be overthrown because of the lack of democracy, but this was often extremely hard since the king was "chosen by God", therefore had the Roman Catholic Church and the army supporting him. The conflicting rule from Absolute monarchy was liberalism wanting a constitution. Democracy includes a package of civil rights and equality between all three social classes, which would strip the monarch of all his supremacy. The competition between constitution and absolute monarchy was introduced in France in 1789-99 during the revolution, when the King was overthrown by liberalists. The French revolution later became a light beacon for liberalists and nationalists all over Europe, and a worst case scenario for all absolute leaders. ...read more.


The differences between the two classes were the same all over Europe, though mostly in Austria and German states3 where they still were culturally mixed, and led by unfair leaders. Not only the population of the "Dual Monarchy" and the 39 German states were inspired by the flow of liberalism and nationalism throughout Europe. "Italy", a culturally and economically mixed area, was also inspired by the French constitution, and was helped by Napoleon to create and build up a democracy in many areas. The Napoleonic era4 was a large step towards a constitutional state in Italy; this was a large problem for Metternich. He did not want anybody to inspire his "people"5 with ideas of independence and civil rights. Metternich also had valuable areas in northern Italy6, where he enjoyed a large flow of money, since he had control and had large influence in the two major areas called Venetia and Lombardy, both with large industrial and large capitals; Milan and Venice. Letting the locals possessing power in such a critical period would simply kill off Metternich's power both in Italy and Austria, resulting in a total loss of influence in the economy and discussions made in Europe. Metternich needed to stop the actions in Italy quickly, before they could succeed and spread the message of constitution and independence. ...read more.


This was a general question mark for all liberal members of the middle classes all over Europe. Many got help from nations abroad, and were led by strong characters to fight the authority, stirring up revolutions and wars for many years, until 1848 when five countries started a chain reaction of revolutions, all started by France12. The middle class could at least strike with support from the working class, when they were suffering from the increasing population, increasing taxes, housing problems, food shortage and many other points that made the all the workers fed up, therefore willing to be part of a revolution. Prince Metternich's opinion towards liberalism and nationalism was strongly negative, although it was clear that his middle class were not satisfied by the amount of influence and unity, and he could also see that his workers and peasants were all suffering. Money could not be earned out on the agrarian sector, and living in the city was directly deadly. Metternich was too busy living his life around the nobles who were all fine with the amount of culture and economic safety they had. Liberalism and Nationalism were a direct threat towards his plans for his Multi-National state and the areas around it that he also dominated. Sadly for him in the end, he was struck by the revolution wave, flowing across Europe, washing the noble families away from their throne. Contents Page 1. Front page 2. Contents page 3. Introduction + Body 4. + 6. Body 7. Body + Conclusion 8. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate History section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate History essays

  1. Italian Unification: True Father of Italy

    As a result, in the course of the 1850s, Piedmont's trade trebled in value; and by the end of the 1850s, Piedmont had effectively claimed first place in Italy, not only in terms of constitutions and of military leadership, but in material terms as well.

  2. The Treaty of Versailles vs. The Treaty of Vienna. Both the Congress of Vienna, ...

    [3] Forming of an alliance, however, should not be misunderstood. The representatives wanted to restore the old regime in Europe and they worked as fairly as possible. In 1818, France had completed the payment of war indemnities and joined the alliance, and it became Quintuple Alliance.

  1. Italian Unification Revision Notes. Italian Politics in 1815

    Piedmont Piedmont's king, Victor Emmanuel I, had pursued a very reactionary policy since his return. He declared that the old constitution of 1770 would remain in force and could never be changed. � When news of the Neapolitan reached Piedmont discontent came out in to the open.

  2. Notes on Italian unification - background and main events

    A constitution as granted in 1812 2) Political autonomy (self- governance) 3) Freedom from Naples rather than unity from Naples 4) They didn't want the Bourbon Monarch 5) They would accept another Italian Prince - There was a revolt in Naples itself that the King did reassert his control; he

  1. French Revolution and the rise of Napoleon - revision notes

    Priests divided into refractory (nieposluszni) and constitutional. Pope Pius VI condemned the Civil Constitution of Clergy in spring 1791. Revolutionary Government claimed refractory priests the enemies of the state (in some places they were supported by the people). It cause a schism in Catholic Church.

  2. Analyse the political factors involved in the unification of Italy up to 1861

    These assemblies all voted for union with Piedmont. Morris claims that in 1857, the National Society had about 8,000 members, and its main members also included La Farina. The Society saw the Crimean War that Piedmont represented as 'Italy's best hope.'

  1. History Essay (Bismarck's Influence on the German Unification

    The Frankfurt Parliament was essentially established by the ?Vorparlament? assembly, as a result of the 1848 revolutions within the German states, if not the rest of Europe. Not only was it important in confirming the leadership of Prussia, but also in terms of planning a united Germany.

  2. IB History HL, Extended Notes: Russia, the Tsars, the Provisional Govenment and the Revolution.

    Judiciary Features 1. 1887 Minister of Justice given the power to hold trials in camera to protect ?the dignity of state power.? 2. 1887 term on volost courts (lower courts) increased to 3 years. 3. 1889 crimes against state officials were to be heard in special courts without a jury.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work