• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

What was the impact of military technology in the First World War? Discuss (i) Progress in Technology as such (ii) Availability of arms and ammunitions (iii) Naval and Air Battles (iv)Civilian causalities

Extracts from this document...


Nikita Bansal Q. What was the impact of military technology in the First World War? Discuss (i) Progress in Technology as such (ii) Availability of arms and ammunitions (iii) Naval and Air Battles (iv)Civilian causalities. (20m) A. The First World War was a battle which involved great military technology. It was a war which relied greatly on their arms and ammunitions. This reliance on military technology led to greater warfare and more destruction. The involvement of military technology increased the destruction and the death tolls to great extents. There were various reasons as to why there was such a great reliance on military technology such as availability and technological advancements. Also, the nature of these battles had a great impact on the First World War. Before the First World War, there was a great age of massive technological advancement in all fields. This led to the production of greater and bigger military appliances which were then used during the war. ...read more.


Nonetheless, all these methods of warfare led to great amounts of destruction for years to come. Also introduced during the course of the war were tanks. This technology was very useful and enabled armies to cut through the barbed wire fences. However, these tanks just increased the deaths, as did all the military technology. The main use of military technology was seen in the Naval and Air battles. Although these methods were not greatly used, they had a great impact on the World War. Scapa Flow was the main British port where all their torpedo's and submarines were harbored. Wilhelmshaven and Kiel Canal were the German Ports. Both Britain and Germany had great number of supplies. Britain had 27 dreadnoughts whereas Germany had 16. This shows the extent of military technology as these machines were built for warfare and were of great use. Goeben and Breslav were two German ships which were so well made that they could travel all the way through the Mediterranean to reach Constantinople. ...read more.


Thus, both naval and air warfare caused destruction and killed several people, including innocent lives. Countries were devastated and mass poverty was present. Thus one can see that these military technologies had a negative effect on the people. Many people were left homeless and they lost loved ones. Many countries were ripped apart and there was a great amount of destruction. There were so many battles fought and each battle had so many lives lost. Over all, the total war causalities were about 37 million people. 16 million were killed and 21 million were injured. Both the Allied and the Central powers lost several people. Thus, one can see that even the victors lost great amounts of people-military as well as civilians. The warfare had no positive outcome and military technology although a breakthrough in the field of science and technology only caused great amounts of death and destruction. Thus, one may conclude by saying that the impact that military technology had on the War was negative as it caused great amounts of destruction and death. Many people were killed and there was grief everywhere. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate History section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate History essays

  1. Why were the central powers defeated in the First World War

    So in conclusion the war at sea played a vital role in the defeat of the central powers as because it brought America to fight against Germany and despite the U boat campaign the British blockade was much more effective and was a key factor in the defeat of Germany and the central powers.

  2. The Importance of Naval Warfare in World War One

    The first being the Battle of Dogger Bank, and the second- the biggest sea battle in history- the Battle of Jutland. The Battle of Dogger Bank was fought in 1915 in Dogger Bank- which has halfway between Germany and Britain.

  1. What Effect Did World War II have on Eastern Europe?

    I will focus this research on Eastern Europe and, more specifically, the countries of Romania, Poland, and the Soviet Union. ROMANIA POLITICAL ASPECT Romania is a country in Eastern Europe, bordering the Black Sea. Today, it's population is estimated at around 21.5 million6.

  2. Wars frequently begin ten years before the first shot is fired. To what extent ...

    Germany decided to attack and defeat France first, then turn their entire army eastward to confront the Russians. The plan involved attacking France through Holland and Belgium. However, the plan faced amendments, which omitted Holland. The Schlieffen Plan was activated on 31 July 1914.

  1. The cold war - the conferences and the start of the cCold War

    which could have led to war and a symbolic event which signaled a much stronger separation of East and West Berlin e. To the Soviets, this is a protective shell around East Berlin while the West presented it as prison wall ==> What was the importance of Berlin as a city to the Cold War, 1945 - 1965?

  2. American Neutrality During World War II and Its Subsequent Involvement in Europe and Asia

    This neutrality act was the first of three to be proposed, each one getting less neutral as a new one was proposed. The first act was criticized for giving President Roosevelt too much power because it would allow him to personally decide which nations would not receive American aid.

  1. WWI. To what extent can it be argued that the First World War was ...

    This nationalistic pride went as far as wanting to "clamor for unification with the independent Serbia across the Danube. (Stavrianos, 434) Additionally, the Balkan Peninsula, "where Bosnia and Serbia were located, was a tense region where mutually antagonistic ethnic groups had just broken away from the control of the Ottoman

  2. Operation Barbarossa was the leading military operation in World War II, yet it failed ...

    a component of the Marganthou Plan where Russia's inhabitants would die by undernourishment and the surplus rations would go to the Germans.11 According to Hans-Adolf Jacobsen, the Nazis had always made great effort against Bolshevism a vital part of their foreign policy, and wanted to stem the increase of Communism

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work