• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

What were the Aims and Achievements of Stalins Foreign Policy between 1928 and 1941?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

´╗┐What were the Aims and Achievements of Stalin?s Foreign Policy between 1928 and 1941? By 1941, Stalin?s Russia would face one of the most brutal onslaughts in her turbulent history, as a direct result of the lack of foresight and diplomatic skill of the Soviet Leader in pursuing a consistent foreign policy between 1928 and 1941. In the opinion of historian Stephen Lee, Stalinist foreign policy ?at its best was skilful, confident and effective, at its worst was blundering, uncertain and ruinous? ? it was this seeming inability to commit to a single path or principle that characterised the constant oscillation of Stalin?s preference between isolationism, cooperation with Germany, formation of a popular front with Allied Powers, dogged pursuit of collective security and the culmination of a ?dangerously naive? outlook, according to Robert Service, that resulted in the ?stunning coup?, described by Lee, that was the Nazi-Soviet Non-Aggression Pact. Russian international relations were in a sorry state by 1928. After unsuccessful wars and easily quelled half-hearted attempts to catalyse a World Revolution, newly established Bolshevik Leader Stalin imposed the austere domestic policies of collectivisation and rapid industrialisation, often at the price of liberty, upon the Soviets in order to become so self-sufficient that the foreign alliances in which their country was sorely lacking would become unnecessary. ...read more.

Middle

This type of about-turn movement characterised Stalin?s ability to ?bend like a reed? according to Stephen Lee in order to secure what he thought necessary for Soviet Russia; in order to please his new prospective allies, the ever-flexible Stalin even ordered a reversal in the formerly stringent policies of the Comintern in August 1935. By 1937, it seemed to Stalin that the pro-Allied attitude of his foreign minister Litvinov was having a positive effect as 1934 saw USSR?s entry into the League of Nations and pacts in 1935 with France and Czechoslovakia effectively achieved the aims of Russian foreign policy, on paper. With the formation of an Anti-Comintern pact involving Germany, Japan and Italy also by 1937, a potential war on two fronts loomed before Russia. Their treaty obligations with France and Czechoslovakia therefore assumed significant importance for their national security, because, as Litvinov orated, ?what other guarantees of security are there?? This period marked the change in Russian international attitude as it became more and more dependent on the success of collective security whilst simultaneously becoming acutely aware of its vulnerability from attacks on both borders through the strengthened relationship between Germany and Japan. ...read more.

Conclusion

By 1941 it was apparent that although all foreign policy aims had been pursued purely in the interests of Soviet Russia, it had not been independent of the influence of foreign power but rather wholly decided by it, and the elasticity of Stalin with ‘the power to divide and subdivide himself…depending on circumstances’ according to Service which facilitated this. An alliance was needed by Russia in order to sustain Socialism In One Country, yet to whom and on what conditions was determined by stronger countries, namely Britain and Germany. Stalin himself was too naïve in international politics, in which he only ‘took a sporadic interest’ according to Haslam, to pay close attention to the possible ramifications of the rapidly vacillating foreign policy decisions, decisions that highlighted his indifference as to whom Russia’s ally was as long as there was one, which in turn discouraged countries from negotiating with such an unscrupulous state. Instead, Stalin met his match in Hitler; the European alliance that should have secured Russia instead left it exposed and without anticipation of attack. What should have been the greatest achievement of foreign policy was without a doubt its greatest failure, and Stalin, in the words of Churchill, was ‘the most completely outwitted bungler of the Second World War’. Ciara Lally 09.05.2010 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate History section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate History essays

  1. How did collective security develop, in particular between WWI and WWII?

    For the first half of the 19th century, the congress system worked very well, and little disputes occurred. However, as rivalry among the nations increased through the 19th century, the nations shared less and less common interest and were busy with domestic problems due to revolutions, enabling Prussia to be

  2. To what extent was Stalin's rise to power due to his opponents' mistakes?

    He also used the Russian Secret Police very tactically. In October 1927, the United Opposition, consisting of Trotsky, Zinoviev and Kamenev, organised a rally to gather support against Stalin. However, the rally tragically failed because Stalin managed to flood it with police, ruining any attempts made to oppose him (Simpson).

  1. How far was Hitler successful in achieving his aims?

    Hitler also managed to force all labour unions under the Nazi Labour Front (6). Throughout Hitler's dictatorship, the rights of Jews were slowly taken away one-by-one. There was little opposition from this as Hitler had made society respectfully submissive to him. Hitler had created fear amongst those who opposed him.

  2. To what extent can Mussolini(TM)s foreign policy be described as a failure?

    Therefore, in this essay, to say that Mussolini's foreign policies "failed" would be to say that he did not fulfil his idealistic expansionist aims, or achieved them, but at a very high price to Italy or that through his foreign policies, he failed to gain mass support and keep himself in power.

  1. To What Extent Was Stalin's Regime Based On Terror

    the peasantry that the system had been too successful and that a different means was necessary, whereas it had not worked at all. Also, motor tractor stations were set up to encourage the peasants to work, providing them with quality machinery to help them with their work.

  2. IB History HL, Extended Notes: Russia, the Tsars, the Provisional Govenment and the Revolution.

    The rioters were often provided with plenty of alcohol and transported by train. Local authorities rarely took action as rioters had the blessing of the government. 4. Alexander III did not approve of the Holy League and banned it in 1882.

  1. History questions on Soviet Russia and its relations with the rest of the World.

    give the plans away and no one wants to let others use it due to fear and being overruled. 1. What are Orwell?s conclusions about what might happen to our world as a result of the invention of the atomic bomb?

  2. Notes on the History and Development of the Arab-Israeli Conflict

    On 14 November, the US began a massive airlift, worth around $3.5 billion, to rearm Israel. Washington's effective response during the Yom Kippur War helped ensure Israeli victory. The US saw Israel as stronger than ever, and as a

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work