• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

What were the Aims and Achievements of Stalins Foreign Policy between 1928 and 1941?

Extracts from this document...


´╗┐What were the Aims and Achievements of Stalin?s Foreign Policy between 1928 and 1941? By 1941, Stalin?s Russia would face one of the most brutal onslaughts in her turbulent history, as a direct result of the lack of foresight and diplomatic skill of the Soviet Leader in pursuing a consistent foreign policy between 1928 and 1941. In the opinion of historian Stephen Lee, Stalinist foreign policy ?at its best was skilful, confident and effective, at its worst was blundering, uncertain and ruinous? ? it was this seeming inability to commit to a single path or principle that characterised the constant oscillation of Stalin?s preference between isolationism, cooperation with Germany, formation of a popular front with Allied Powers, dogged pursuit of collective security and the culmination of a ?dangerously naive? outlook, according to Robert Service, that resulted in the ?stunning coup?, described by Lee, that was the Nazi-Soviet Non-Aggression Pact. Russian international relations were in a sorry state by 1928. After unsuccessful wars and easily quelled half-hearted attempts to catalyse a World Revolution, newly established Bolshevik Leader Stalin imposed the austere domestic policies of collectivisation and rapid industrialisation, often at the price of liberty, upon the Soviets in order to become so self-sufficient that the foreign alliances in which their country was sorely lacking would become unnecessary. ...read more.


This type of about-turn movement characterised Stalin?s ability to ?bend like a reed? according to Stephen Lee in order to secure what he thought necessary for Soviet Russia; in order to please his new prospective allies, the ever-flexible Stalin even ordered a reversal in the formerly stringent policies of the Comintern in August 1935. By 1937, it seemed to Stalin that the pro-Allied attitude of his foreign minister Litvinov was having a positive effect as 1934 saw USSR?s entry into the League of Nations and pacts in 1935 with France and Czechoslovakia effectively achieved the aims of Russian foreign policy, on paper. With the formation of an Anti-Comintern pact involving Germany, Japan and Italy also by 1937, a potential war on two fronts loomed before Russia. Their treaty obligations with France and Czechoslovakia therefore assumed significant importance for their national security, because, as Litvinov orated, ?what other guarantees of security are there?? This period marked the change in Russian international attitude as it became more and more dependent on the success of collective security whilst simultaneously becoming acutely aware of its vulnerability from attacks on both borders through the strengthened relationship between Germany and Japan. ...read more.


By 1941 it was apparent that although all foreign policy aims had been pursued purely in the interests of Soviet Russia, it had not been independent of the influence of foreign power but rather wholly decided by it, and the elasticity of Stalin with ‘the power to divide and subdivide himself…depending on circumstances’ according to Service which facilitated this. An alliance was needed by Russia in order to sustain Socialism In One Country, yet to whom and on what conditions was determined by stronger countries, namely Britain and Germany. Stalin himself was too naïve in international politics, in which he only ‘took a sporadic interest’ according to Haslam, to pay close attention to the possible ramifications of the rapidly vacillating foreign policy decisions, decisions that highlighted his indifference as to whom Russia’s ally was as long as there was one, which in turn discouraged countries from negotiating with such an unscrupulous state. Instead, Stalin met his match in Hitler; the European alliance that should have secured Russia instead left it exposed and without anticipation of attack. What should have been the greatest achievement of foreign policy was without a doubt its greatest failure, and Stalin, in the words of Churchill, was ‘the most completely outwitted bungler of the Second World War’. Ciara Lally 09.05.2010 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate History section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate History essays

  1. To what extent was Stalin's rise to power due to his opponents' mistakes?

    health along with his failed policies made him unsuitable as a leader. As a result of illness, he managed to miss Lenin's funeral which turned out to be a very important moment in Stalin's political career in terms of gaining public support (Simpson).

  2. The Domestic Policies of Stalin

    Stalin's social policies began with "The Great Retreat" in 1930, in which he restored conservative ideas and made it harder for women to be employed as doctors or engineers which was possible after the revolution. After the revolution abortion was normal and so was divorce.

  1. George Washington's Greatest Achievements

    With the help of Jefferson, he also resolved the issue of the location of the permanent national capital. Another significant outcome was that Congress decided that the permanent capital should be on the Potomac, and that Washington was empowered to pick the exact spot, allowing him the opportunity to create

  2. IB History HL, Extended Notes: Russia, the Tsars, the Provisional Govenment and the Revolution.

    Having the right to appeal any court sentence. 1. Meant to be temporary but continued to 1917. Alexander believed that Jews? condition was ?preordained by the Gospels? few except Reutern challenged him. 2. Commission set up in 1883 to examine Jews? status in Russian society and recommend a way to revise laws against them.

  1. To what extent did the Treaty of Versailles reflect the original aims of the ...

    Many of Britain?s original aims were reflected in the Treaty of Versailles. Firstly, the British were intent on the destruction of the German Navy in order to ensure the security of the British Navy. While the German fleet had effectively been destroyed by the end of the war, this aim

  2. Notes on the History and Development of the Arab-Israeli Conflict

    - Israel would not accept Palestinian refugees back, emphasising the small size of Israel, arguing that as Arabs, the displaced Palestinians could easily find homes in neighbouring states, and that the returnees, due to their hostility towards the Jewish state, would constitute a subversive fifth column, dedicated to the destruction of the state.

  1. Why did collective security fail to keep the peace between 1920 and 1935?

    They verbally reprimanded Japan and by the time a investigation into the invasion began the occupation of the Manchuria providence was complete. Japan left the League due to the fact that Britain was being hypocritical due to the fact that that was the way that Britain had gained its huge empire.

  2. To what extent were Stalins economic policies successful up to 1940?

    25 million small peasant holdings were turned into a quarter of a million collective farms, and by 1940, 98% of Russian arable land was collectivized.[7] The introduction of modern machinery, such as tractors were given to the peasants to increase grain production.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work