• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

What were the reasons and results for the Truman Doctrine and Marshall Plan?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

What were the reasons and results for the Truman Doctrine and Marshall Plan? By the time the Second World War had come to its tumultuous end, tensions had already begin to rise between former allies. While the War which had once held Europe at the brink of destruction was finally over, a new threat loomed overhead. The polarization of the Capitalist powers, including the United States and her ally Great Britain and the Communist states of Soviet Russia and her allies further darkened any hopes of a peaceful future. As both powers scrambled to exert their power, it became clear that valuable allies were necessary as a means of deterrence and support in case war were to break out. The United States aimed to spread its influence and ideologies for this very reason. As the threat of war continued to increase, drastic measures needed to be undertaken. To begin, this essay will critically examine the reasons for which the United States instituted the Truman Doctrine and the Marshall Plan, and the results which they had on the countries affected by them. Two years after the Second World War, countries were reeling under its economic repercussions. ...read more.

Middle

However, there is much debate as to the underlying reasons for said Doctrine. As per the Orthodox view, Truman had no choice but to resort to the Truman Doctrine due to the underlying rifts in Soviet- American relations due to the aggressive Soviet aggression. Already, many Slavic and Baltic states had come under the grasp of Soviet expansionism, and the Orthodox View points out that there was no other way for the United States to abate the proliferation of communism. However, the Revisionist School of thought maintains that it was due to the aggressive American demand for U.S- friendly markets led to the enactment of the Truman Doctrine. It points out that the insatiable demand of American Capitalism was one of the main reasons as spreading capitalism would guarantee open markets for America. Furthermore, by 1947, the US Secretary of State George Marshall formulated a plan for the economic revival of the ailing European economies known as the Marshall Plan. This plan provided American financial support to the war-torn Europe. While all countries were eligible, they had to have a free market, available to American trade interests, making it impossible for Communist States to apply. ...read more.

Conclusion

However, this plan was extremely controversial. Soviet leaders saw it as dollar imperialism- a means by which the USA would gain control Europe for its own financial interests. Furthermore, there were many consequences to this plan. In response, Soviet Russia set up the Cominform which coordinated communist parties throughout Europe and Comecon which was the Soviet response to the Marshall plan- an organization set to coordinate the economies of communist countries. Finally, one of the most drastic impacts of both the Marshall Plan and the Truman Doctrine is the Berlin Blockade which occurred from 1948 to 1949 in which a blockade was placed by Soviet troops on West-Berlin which was controlled by allied forces. Thus, it can be concluded that both the Marshall Plan and the Truman Doctrine had underlying causes, and as some schools of thought claim, were used to satisfy the ulterior motives of Capitalist. However, it is also certain that both of these had an immense effect on the political scenario during the time period in which they were instituted and led to a significant increase in both tensions and mutual fear between the Eastern and Western powers. ?? ?? ?? ?? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate History section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate History essays

  1. What were the intentions of President Harry S. Truman and General Douglas MacArthur regarding ...

    They formed the National Revolutionary Army to fight against Japan. At the same time, communists founded the People's Liberation Army, led by Kim Il Sung, and struggled against Japan for the liberation of Korea in the Korean peninsula.

  2. For what reasons, and with what results up to 1963, did the Unites States ...

    According to Kennan, the Soviets and its satellite states would either unwillingly accept these conditions or have to give up its "exclusive orientation of its economies." And as seen, when Molotov, the Soviet Foreign Minister went to Paris, as soon as the conditions were made explicit, the talks quickly broke off.

  1. British Colonialism in India. Reasons for it, and its consequences.

    I believe it is my duty to God, my Queen, and my country..." In keeping with the ideas of white supremacy, Europeans also colonized to spread their religion to nations that they felt were inferior. Britain's Colonization of India In the mid eighteenth century, India became one of Great Britain's most important colonies.

  2. Did Truman really save 500,000 American live through dropping the Hiroshima atomic bomb?

    and growing21, whereas the projected U.S invasion forces were only 766,700, creating a ratio of approximately 1.4 American troops to 1 Japanese troop. The atomic bomb was successfully tested on June 16th, and presented Truman an alternative to the invasion.

  1. Chief Justice Marshall

    (Wernick, 115) Jefferson was always in debt and saw himself as the representative of poor farmers and the slave owning. Jefferson thought that the government had no right to do anything not spelled out in the constitution. Marshall was a self-made Lawyer and believed that a country needs a central government with power and responsibility enough to override local interests.

  2. Notes on the History and Development of the Arab-Israeli Conflict

    - After the Labour-Likud coalition broke up and Shamir formed a government which now relied on minor religious parties to stay in power. These parties were totally opposed to giving up land, conversing with the PLO and they pushed for more settlements in the WB.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work