• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why did collective security fail to keep the peace between 1920 and 1935?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

´╗┐Gino Saad Mr. McMahon IB History 2 Why did collective security fail to keep the peace between 1920 and 1935? Collective security was a system of maintaining world peace and security by joint action on the part of the nations of the world. The League of Nations used it as a tool to prevent another outbreak of war. At the very beginning of the League it seemed that the policy of collective security was a good and easily achievable policy of how to keep countries inline and not to take action, which might possibly cause another war. During the 1920?s the structure of the idea of collective security was tested. This began in 1920 with the Aaland Islands and it ended in 1935 with the Abyssinia crisis. The idea of collective security was not thought out as well as it should have been considering it effected the whole world and it would dictate many countries decisions about what to do during a crisis. ...read more.

Middle

This caused for a serious problem of countries beginning to sign agreements that effected the global society (i.e. the naval conferences) this allowed countries to act in self-interest which was a serious problem at the time because with more and more countries acting in self interest there was bound to be more confrontations. These confrontations would occur between member states, which would then bring up the crisis at the League and there was little that could be done due to the fact that the different member states would veto each other to get the result from the League that they wanted. This would create a problem were 2 countries were unwilling to yield on their claims to an area of land. The League had adopted the ideas of ?self-determination? from Wilson?s original 14 points and used this to help solve problems. When the economic crisis the world many countries realized that they needed to focus more internally rather than ensure the safety of member states. ...read more.

Conclusion

By ignoring the Leagues words and threats of sanctions Mussolini was able to complete control of Abyssinia. These last 2 crisis?s were considered to be the ?nail in the coffin? of the League. They had failed to uphold the ideas of collective security and because of this the League had sealed its own fate as a global organization. The idea of collective security failed to keep the peace between 1920 and 1935 due to the fact that the league was unable to act against the larger powers due to its lack of support, and the depression. These two causes a cause of major countries not entirely embracing the ideas of collective security as a tool for peace and also the League was structured in such a way that no action could ever be taken against a permanent member state. The idea of collective security would never have worked unless all of the powerful nations of the world came together to enforce the ideas. Due to the fact that they didn?t countries took advantage of the Leagues weaknesses and eventually this weakness would cause the second world war. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate History section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate History essays

  1. Why did the policy of Collective Security established by the League of Nations fail ...

    As this meant going against the League of Nations, an opposition took place, resulting in Japan leaving the LON, allowing such nation to succeed in it's operation with no consequences whatsoever. This event underlines once again the lack of authority the LON suffered in it's attempt to provide world wide peace.

  2. Historical Investigation - League of Nations - Abyssinian crisis

    Canal.19 If it is not for Suez Canal, Italy would have had difficulties supplying armed forces during the conflict. Both Britain and France were not prepared to risk their naval power in the Mediterranean for the sake of Ethiopia.20 The protest caused Hoare to drop the plan since he needed

  1. How did collective security develop, in particular between WWI and WWII?

    However, at that time it was less focused internationally. In 18th century, a number of attempts were made to promote collective security, however, they were not very successful. Later, in the 19th century, after the Napoleon conquest of Europe, European powers sought for ways to keep peace in Europe.

  2. Mao and China Revision Guide

    In 1965 it was reported that 30,000,000 primary school-aged children, mostly in the rural areas, were not receiving formal education. Educational resources were concentrated in the urban areas, not only in middle and high schools, but also in primary schools.

  1. Why did Tsarism fail to survive the first world war

    A very significant event would be Bloody Sunday (January 22, 1905) where the people displayed their unification against the Tsar, but in a peaceful manner. 150,000 people marched in protest to the winter palace where they were savagely gunned down by the Imperial Guard2.

  2. Extended Essay - The Role of a UN-Secretary General to Achieve World Peace: The ...

    In the evening, on 25th October, U Thant received a cable from Khrushchev with a positive response to his appeal. It read: ?I understand your concern?I agree to your proposal, which is in the interest of peace.?[13] Khrushchev?s reply was a critical evidence of U Thant?s success in his very first initiative.

  1. Was the League of Nations doomed to fail?

    were outlined in his manifesto from 1920; that ?the United States shall not be obligated to contribute to any expenses of the League of Nations? and also show the USA?s rejection of disarmament proposals; ?it reserves the right to increase such armaments without...consent?.

  2. To what extent did Germany play a role in the events leading to the ...

    According to Mussolini?s new policy, this served as a pretext to escalate the conflict, and Ethiopians became aware that war was coming. Mussolini knew that he had to be more aggressive, to display some strength, and to show the seriousness of the situation.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work