• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why did collective security fail to keep the peace between 1920 and 1935?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

´╗┐Gino Saad Mr. McMahon IB History 2 Why did collective security fail to keep the peace between 1920 and 1935? Collective security was a system of maintaining world peace and security by joint action on the part of the nations of the world. The League of Nations used it as a tool to prevent another outbreak of war. At the very beginning of the League it seemed that the policy of collective security was a good and easily achievable policy of how to keep countries inline and not to take action, which might possibly cause another war. During the 1920?s the structure of the idea of collective security was tested. This began in 1920 with the Aaland Islands and it ended in 1935 with the Abyssinia crisis. The idea of collective security was not thought out as well as it should have been considering it effected the whole world and it would dictate many countries decisions about what to do during a crisis. ...read more.

Middle

This caused for a serious problem of countries beginning to sign agreements that effected the global society (i.e. the naval conferences) this allowed countries to act in self-interest which was a serious problem at the time because with more and more countries acting in self interest there was bound to be more confrontations. These confrontations would occur between member states, which would then bring up the crisis at the League and there was little that could be done due to the fact that the different member states would veto each other to get the result from the League that they wanted. This would create a problem were 2 countries were unwilling to yield on their claims to an area of land. The League had adopted the ideas of ?self-determination? from Wilson?s original 14 points and used this to help solve problems. When the economic crisis the world many countries realized that they needed to focus more internally rather than ensure the safety of member states. ...read more.

Conclusion

By ignoring the Leagues words and threats of sanctions Mussolini was able to complete control of Abyssinia. These last 2 crisis?s were considered to be the ?nail in the coffin? of the League. They had failed to uphold the ideas of collective security and because of this the League had sealed its own fate as a global organization. The idea of collective security failed to keep the peace between 1920 and 1935 due to the fact that the league was unable to act against the larger powers due to its lack of support, and the depression. These two causes a cause of major countries not entirely embracing the ideas of collective security as a tool for peace and also the League was structured in such a way that no action could ever be taken against a permanent member state. The idea of collective security would never have worked unless all of the powerful nations of the world came together to enforce the ideas. Due to the fact that they didn?t countries took advantage of the Leagues weaknesses and eventually this weakness would cause the second world war. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate History section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate History essays

  1. How did collective security develop, in particular between WWI and WWII?

    He wanted to use the principle of collective security to achieve this aim; therefore most of the ideas were based on collective security. ("Wilson - A Portrait | League of Nations.") The idea was to establish an organization that could prevent wars through "disarmament, international coorperation, open diplomacy, restrictions on right to wage wars and penalties for making war."

  2. Why did the Second Spanish Republic Fail?

    had set the extreme polarization in Spain already, virtually no one wanted the reforms to be carried out peacefully. Thus surprisingly the pressure exerted on the Popular Front did not come from the Right, who was at the time disorganised and disoriented, but from the Left.

  1. Collapse of the League of Nations

    Nevertheless, Hitler deduced Germany is not yet ready to start a war and accepted Chamberlain's offer.

  2. Why did the policy of Collective Security established by the League of Nations fail ...

    As this meant going against the League of Nations, an opposition took place, resulting in Japan leaving the LON, allowing such nation to succeed in it's operation with no consequences whatsoever. This event underlines once again the lack of authority the LON suffered in it's attempt to provide world wide peace.

  1. Appeal to the League of Nations

    country a new guarantee for the maintenance of her territorial integrity and independence" -They saw that from 1923 onward, Haile did not bring more disorder and insecurity but rather he brought a central power that is better obeyed and a more united country -Claims he could have still done better

  2. The United States' pursuit of Pancho Villa jeopardized American security to such an extent ...

    body of an unknown American, who had been blindfolded with the hands tied and a bullet at the back of the head.[10] As the expedition carried on, Mexican raiders crossed the Rio Grande and attacked Glenn Springs and Bolquillas in Texas.

  1. Extended Essay - The Role of a UN-Secretary General to Achieve World Peace: The ...

    First Phase: The Naval Quarantine Soon after the United States had called upon an emergency meeting of the Security Council, U Thant, the United Nations' Secretary-General, received further requests from the Soviet Union and Cuba to solve the predicament, stating that the action of the US was breaching the

  2. Why did Tsarism fail to survive the first world war

    Rather, caused its demise. Though Historians such as Robert Conquest (who is a reliable source since his works were written in the 21st century) have stated that if not for the First World War, Tsarism in Russia would have lasted much longer. This brings up the thought that maybe Tsarism failed because of the

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work