• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why did the Communists win the Chinese Civil War?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Why did the communists win the Civil War? By Resa Ng The last phase of the Chinese Civil War lasted from 1945 to 1949. At the time, the CCP (Chinese Communist Party) led by Mao Zedong, and the GMD (Guomindang) led by Chiang Kai Shek were vying for the power to lead the whole of China. At first the GMD had the advantage. They had the support of the United States, who provided advanced weapons, financial aid, and were officially recognized by the rest of the world as the real government of China. Furthermore, they had the support of the wealthy upper classes. However, the CCP had the support of the common people in China, due to their communist ideology, and because the commoners could identify with the CCP. In October 1949, the CCP won the war and Mao proclaimed the establishment of the People's Republic of China. The CCP has the support of the majority of the population: the peasants, while the GDP had the support of the only upper classes. The morale of the CCP army was high whole the GDP army members did not even want to be there. The ideology of the CCP was that of equality, which appealed to the peasants, while the GDP had a relatively autoritarian rule that focused on the comfort and security of the upper classes. Finally the CCP was lead by a middle class peasant whom other peasants identified with, and who knew how to move the masses while the GDP was lead by a man with a military background without much of a knack for diplomacy or politics. ...read more.

Middle

An example of the soldiers' state within the CCP army is a quote from Edgar Snow, "There was very little difference in living quarters of commanders and men, and they passed freely back and forth without any formality."3 Because of the poor financial condition of the CCP, they treated each other with much less formality and with more respect. Also, the leaders of the CCP army made sure the troops had recreational activities except work, they had regular broadcast victories to keep the morale of the army high. A network of trust and support was built through these policies within the army, which was crucial for the guerrilla tactics employed later. These tactics were explained as thus, "... When the enemy tires, we attach, when the enemy retreats, we pursue." A historical event - the Long March in 1934, was an important strategic advantage for the CCP, although it was in effect a tactical defeat militarily as they lost many soldiers, this came with beneficial psychological and organizational effects. It boosted the morale within the army and undermined the GMD'S anti-communist propaganda of naming the Long March as the great retreat, but instead it strengthened the impression of the army as being highly determined, tenacious and courageous. These tactics were very clear and concise and helped bring strong determination within the army. In contrast with the CCP army, the GDP army was conscripted, and the basis of conscription was bribery and influence; it angered the poor and middle class that some of the rich never entered the army, thereby these soldiers held a grudge and didn't want to fight. ...read more.

Conclusion

He wasn't making the right decision and it shows that he wasn't fit to be a ruler, from what happened in Manchuria, it reflects how he couldn't see what was best for his troops, that the people in his hands are valuable lives, he'd rather risk the lives of millions in a bet. In conclusion, the belief that a government should exist not only for the people, but of and by them as well, was reiterated time and again, the CCP were wise enough to understand this and laid their tactical decisions with careful planning. There is no one single reason that led to the Chinese Communist Party coming to power In 1949; their success is one of great complexity but In my opinion I think that the most important stepping stone essential for the CCP's victory in the Chinese Civil War is the support of the peasantry, it is inconceivable that such a massive social transformation could not have occurred without the support of the cast majority of the peasantry in China and they are the ones who sided with the CCP when the CCP believed in equality for all and the CCP not only believed in it but implemented this equality. 1 1 Civil War in China, 1999,p.247 2 Wood John and McManus Andrew, 'China Revolutionary Leadership',1998, New Zealand, Macmillian Publishers New Zealand Limited, P.70 3 Edgar Snow, 1936 4 China shakes the world', J. Belden, 1949 5 C.P. Fitzgerald, 'Revolution in China', 1952 6 Mao Zedong, "selected works", 1927 Why did the Communists win the Chinese Civil War? By: Resa Ng 11JN Mr. Caves 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate History section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate History essays

  1. Analyse the factors that led to the rise of the Communist party in China.

    Communist policies enabled him to do so. He would probably have succeeded in establishing communism anyway. The KMT also defeated the warlords, but the communists had a lot of supporters, and could have had more without the KMT around, and probably would have managed. They could have even combated the Japanese, as they would not have been attacked.

  2. Why did the Communists win the Civil war?

    It was obvious that Chiang Kai-shek found himself distracted by the CCP. "Believing that China was not yet ready to confront Japanese military power and obsessed with his desire to eliminate domestic opposition, Chiang Kai-shek adopted a policy of appeasement and conciliation towards the Japanese" (Journal of Asian Studies, February 1985).

  1. Analyse the failure of the political parties in Japan in the 1920s to win ...

    The public's respect and support for the Japanese Government started to drastically dissipate as the Population increased. This was because it was made mandatory for all Japanese children to attend school for 4 years (which was soon pushed to 6 years).

  2. The Chinese Civil War

    and the Nationalist's Party (KMT) and the outcomes of the war. More specifically, this investigation deals with the success of the CCP's triumph, examining the question: Evaluate the reasons for the success of Mao and the communists gaining support during the Chinese Civil War.

  1. Mao Zedong and the Education(TM)s changes in the People's Republic of China

    The Maoists were prepared to let things run to extremes.16 C. Evaluation of Sources David Milton, Nancy Milton and Franz Schurmann (1974) People's China: Volume 4 of the China Reader series. The Milton's are professors of Sociology at Berkley. Schurmann is one of the leading China scholars in the United States 17.

  2. World War 1 Information

    along with it because they fear an alliance between the US and Germany > 14 points lost in the discussions and Germany is tricked into signing the treaty that they did not agree upon > Provisions of Versailles Treaty: > Germany surrenders Alsace-Lorraine to France > The Rhineland demilitarized >

  1. the causes and consequences of the spanish civil war

    Civil War, the proponents of the 1931 constitution see the aspects related to the church as small compared to the enormous hopes that the Second Republic in 1931 brought for Spanish workers, peasants, and women It seems that, as a result of the Civil War, the role of the Catholic Church was highlighted and strongly identified with the Franco regime.

  2. Industry vs Agriculture: The Economics Leading to the Civil War

    What was problematic was the fact that the North supported tariffs while the South opposed them. The North hoped that tariffs were raised so that Americans would buy Northern goods rather than buy expensive imports. But the South, for the most part, felt they would be negatively affected by tariffs

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work