• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why did the policy of Collective Security established by the League of Nations fail to prevent the outbreak of war in 1939?

Extracts from this document...


Why did the policy of Collective Security established by the League of Nations fail to prevent the outbreak of war in 1939? "I have returned from Germany with Peace for our Time!" waving in his hand the paper of the Munich Pact, on an airfield in Southern England, this famous phrase by Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain in September 1938 is mostly remembered for its massive misjudgement of Nazi Germany�s true intentions and the total failure of appeasement. However, it could - symbolically - also well be seen as the final nail in the coffin for the League of Nations covenant and its strategies of Collective Security and Disarmament. A few months earlier, in March 1938, Nazi Germany had annexed Austria, a League Member, thus causing a league member to "disappear" without any reaction from the League whatsoever, demonstrating to the world its absolute powerlessness, and less than a year after Chamberlain�s unintentionally ironic speech, Germany would invade Poland and start the Second World War. ...read more.


Further proof can be found in the Abyssinian crisis and the Munich Pact, which once again delineate the LON's restricted authority. Finally, with the Munich Pact, France and the United Kingdom conceded the Sudetenland to Nazi Germany in a direct violation of their military alliance with Czechoslovakia. Here two Nation-States were rigorously pursuing their own national interests to damaging another Country, ally even. This unilateral pursuit of security interests by individual nations is in stark contrast to the ideas and intentions of Collective Security proposed by the League of Nations, which by this time was incapable of any action. Equally, the above key examples of individual Nation-States aggressively pursuing their own interests throughout the 1930�s is in contrast to the rampant optimism and clear willingness to collaborate internationally that seemed to prevail throughout much of the 1920�s. Perhaps under the impression of the still fresh horrors of WWI, a conviction that only through working closely together on numerous fronts could Collective Security be effectively achieved. ...read more.


practice, the depression made countries desire more land and more power as they were more worried about their own problems than the international issues, as the league kept failing nations ended up ignoring it, the main members let the league down as Italy and Japan were more interested in satisfying their own needs and France and Britain betrayed it,. Ultimately, a contract, or covenant is only as good as the true intention and willingness of those that make part of it. If the partners, and especially the major players, continuously undermine and counteract the agreement, it must ultimately fail. This was the fate of the LON covenant. It was so ambitious and far-reaching, it wanted too much from too many too fast. Even the key proponents of the covenant were not able keep their promise once their National interests were seen as even potentially threatening. In the end, national sovereignty was of great importance and overcame internationalism and the League of Nations. Daniel Longo Collective Security Failure History 11th HL Ms. Mcphilemy Daniel Longo Collective Security Failure History 11th HL Ms. Mcphilemy ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate History section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate History essays

  1. Free essay

    May the League of Nations be considered a complete failure? Answer this question and ...

    The first was introduced by the British Prime Minister in the attempt to convince the members of the international body to "accept arbitration (Lowe, p.47)" of the League and to pledge and commit themselves to acting, in order to protect a hypothetical victim of attack.

  2. The cold war - the conferences and the start of the cCold War

    In early 1948, tripartite US- British- French talks on the future of Germany took place in London. It was decided that a separate West German state would be established with a separate currency. The French were very reluctant to agree with this as they feared a Soviet reaction c)

  1. The League of Nations - Although the League of Nations had several successes, it ...

    The Germans were outraged due to the severe provisions of the treaty. Furthermore, Germany was not invited to the peace conference. Isolating Germany at the Paris Peace Conference foreshadowed to the isolation of Germany in the League of Nations. Germany, initially, was excluded from being a member of the international

  2. Woodrow Wilson. The absence of the United States in the League of Nations led ...

    to 38.9 The final vote was 49 to 35 in favour but still short of the two-thirds majority required.10 Republicans supported the reservations but Democrats opposed them, there was never an agreement because each party wanted to discredit the other.11 The problem started in Article 10 of League of Nations Covenant.

  1. Historical Investigation - League of Nations - Abyssinian crisis

    but got rejected.11 On 2 December 1935, Hoare went to Paris to have discussion about compromises over Abyssinia with Pierre Laval.12 In Britain, the public wanted the LON to take a strong stand in keeping peace by preventing Italy from conquering Abyssinia.13 Mussolini accepted the plan but the British public's outcry led Britain to resign the plan.

  2. IB History HL, Extended Notes: Russia, the Tsars, the Provisional Govenment and the Revolution.

    Lenin rejected the necessity of the capitalist period and insisted that the elite party could lead the masses in revolution before Marx and the Mensheviks had thought. Role of the peasantry 1. 1917 Lenin realized the peasants could act as a revolutionary class in spite of his ideas in ?What is to be done.? Departure from Marx ideas.

  1. Why did collective security fail to keep the peace between 1920 and 1935?

    and Bulgaria and Greece (1925). League was too weak without the support of the USA, Russia, and Germany to make a big country do as it wished (for instance, Italy over Corfu in 1923). Another weakness was that the League?s structure was a complete mess.

  2. Why did Tsarism fail to survive the first world war

    This was not helped by the fact that he had a very large and difficult country to rule. Russia?s poor communication, bad economy etc only aided Nicholas?s poor ruling and the fact that all of the Tsar?s ministers worked separately rather than as a team.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work