• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why did Tsarism fail to survive the first world war

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

´╗┐Why did Tsarism fail to survive the First World War? When examining the fall of Tsarism in Russia, It is vital to further explore the rest of Europe and under what form of government it was under in order to fully understand and be able to compare how backwards and in some sense, medieval Tsarism was. Tsarism was a backwards regime that was not up to date so to speak with the rest of Europe and around 1900, worker?s conditions in Russia were way below that of any other European country, which triggered much social unrest. The reason it failed, is because of many short term such as the outbreak of the first world war, the abdication of Nicholas ll, the 1905 revolution and the 1917 February revolution, as well as long term factors such as the state of the society, the politics, the backwards economy and the poverty that had been getting worse and worse throughout the years. Ultimately it was a dictatorship, with a Tsar supposedly appointed by god and the 1917 revolution was the final block that caused the whole regime to fall. To add to the demise, the Tsar Nicholas was a fairly unfit person to rule such a vast amount of land and under such circumstances, but his abdication was not the immediate end of Tsarism, but rather a factor that greatly contributed to its end. As history shows, no country or people ever are satisfied under a dictatorial regime and revolution is inevitable. Tsarism was no exception and was a recipe for the destruction of itself. It gave ultimate power to the Tsar without regard to the people?s suggestions, requests or will. ...read more.

Middle

Soon they too turned on the Tsar and the string that was holding his regime together snapped. Upon the Tsars return after the revolution was already over and the power seized by the people, his train was not allowed to enter Petrograd. Visited personally on his train by Rudzienko, head of the Duma, it was made clear to him that he was no longer in power and his rule was finished, after the famous signing of a letter of resignation on the 15 March 1917. Russia?s economy was appalling due to the medieval regime and the politics which prevented its prospering. 85% of the population lived in the countryside but only 5% of the land was used for farming. Old-fashioned farming methods resulted in inefficiency and starvation. This resulted among others in the inability to provide enough food for the army which led to desertion, disease and in the end the destruction of the entire professional military that was acted as the Tsars ?strength?. As for the industry, Russia remained rich in oil. Unfortunately, due to the backwards regime, it only began to industrialize in the late 19th century and was dependent on foreign investment and was still behind the western powers. The start of the war in 1914 proved to be a slight rise for the Russian economy; output was raised by 20% and the people were looking forward to victory. When the latter expectation did not occur, rather its opposite, more peasants were gradually being sent to the front, thus not leaving anyone to work on the land and reducing production to a number close to nil. This caused a scissor crisis. ...read more.

Conclusion

The destruction and turn of the army may be the final cause of the fall of Tsarism, Russia was in such a strained state that ultimately, the Tsar only had the army to enforce his regime, but once the war broke out, all of the professional soldiers were killed and replaced by peasants whose policies were against the Tsar. The chain reaction that led to the destruction of the army, however, was caused by the long term factors such as poor economy which prevented good equipment and sustaining the war of attrition, the state of the society and economy led to a strain that Russia was under with the army keeping that thin string together. The largest factor being the war that brought it on its knees, it showed that the idea of Tsarism and its laws and ideology did not permit it to survive. All the classes of the Russian population unified in their hate for the tsar and dealt the final blow which was the February revolution in 1917 in Petrograd without any imperial guard to oppose them and fend them off again as they did during Bloody Sunday. This displayed truly that even the army was against the Tsar and so, he was forced to abdicate. This was the end of the Tsar. In his decree of abdication, he wished to pass on the autocratic ruins to his brother. : ?We direct our brother to conduct the affairs of state in full and inviolable union with the representatives of the people in the legislative bodies on those principles.....? His brother?s refusal of the proposition marked the true end of Tsarism forever breaking the long line of autocratic rule and instating a provisional government in Russia. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate History section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate History essays

  1. Notes on Italian unification - background and main events

    troops to divert Garibaldi from the Papal states which risked bringing France into the situation * Cavour really only ever achieved unification of the North Venice Joins the Italian State 1866 - Venice still needed to be redeemed as part of Italy - In 1866, Bismarck was planning for Prussia

  2. Was the Russian Revolution due more to tsars inadequacy as a ruler of the ...

    their goals."11 February Revolution On January 22, 1917 [Bloody Sunday Anniversary] antigovernment and antiwar demonstrations for World War I, were around the country to protest the critical food situation.12 More demonstrations continued on February 28 -the day generally acknowledged as the beginning of the Russian Revolution.13 Instead of taking action,

  1. Assess the effects between 1914 and 1921 of the First World War on the ...

    The absence of men placed a huge burden on women and youngsters. Many families found that they had no income since up to that time men had been the only working members of the family and the sources of finance.

  2. The cold war - the conferences and the start of the cCold War

    In 1961, America had a new president, the young and inexperience John F. Kennedy. Khrushchev, the Soviet leader decided that he could intimidate and put pressure upon Kennedy 8) DON'T EVER MIX THEM UP: 1949 - Blockade Crisis, 1961 - the crisis of the wall * The crisis of 1961; 1)

  1. Why were the central powers defeated in the First World War

    This psychologically destroyed the Germany army. Another vital reason for the central powers were defeated in the First World War was the collapse of Germany's allies. Firstly, was the collapse of Austria-Hungary. Austria-Hungary did well against Italy. However in the end they were defeated by Italy in the battle of Veneto.

  2. Developments of Music During the Middle Ages

    Works Cited Edmonds, Amy. "Polyphonic Music from Its Beginnings through the Thirteenth Century." 2002. Concise History of Western Music. 10 Dec. 2007. <http://www.wwnorton.com/college/music/concise/ch3_outline.htm> Einstein, Albert. A Short History of Music. New York: Alfred A. Knopf Inc., 1969. Erickson, Raymond. "Musica enchiriadis, Scholia enchiriadis."

  1. IB History HL, Extended Notes: Russia, the Tsars, the Provisional Govenment and the Revolution.

    Also would help to form a commercial system of farming when serfdom ended. 8. Transport gave people mobility and migration to expanding areas of production while serfdom tied peasants to the village. Economic 1. Serfdom was economically inefficient. Many argued that free wage labor was more productive than forced labor

  2. To what extent were economic conditions the predominant factor in the proliferation and manifestation ...

    However by 1927 the party remained stagnant at approximately 75,000 members and a mere 7 deputies in parliament, clear evidence corroborating the fact that Hitler and Goebbels?s new drive into the industrial working class had been illusionary. The profundity of the social democratic and communist tradition amongst the urban working

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work