• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why was it possible for Stalin to become the leader of the USSR?

Extracts from this document...


HISTORY ESSAY OUTLINE WHY WAS IT POSSIBLE FOR STALIN TO BECOME THE LEADER OF THE USSR? I. Introduction: * Struggle for leadership proved that the most brutal and cunning would always win - Stalin * Explain briefly that Stalin's rise to power was not simple and effortless * State the research question and link to the body part II. Body: * Some historians give "luck" a big role in Stalin's rise to power (eg: death of Lenin, Sverdlov) => Give a counter-claim as to why luck was not so significant. * Explain why Stalin's rise to power was mostly due to his position as the General Secretary * Explain how the "Soviet bureaucratic machine" favored Stalin instead of others => Historian E. H. Carr => Structuralist school * Explain how his personal qualities allowed him to defeat his political rivals => Historian R. Conquest => "Liberal School" - Stalin's colleagues underestimated him and gave him chance to strike deadly blows * Explain how Stalin's political rivals lacked the skills to defeat him => Trotsky although intellectually superior, was not popular among equals => Trotsky for various reasons, was unfit for internal political struggles like this => Zinoviev and Kamenev made critical mistakes during the struggle for power * Stalin had an unique grasp of what the majority wanted so his policies were popular III. ...read more.


In my view, his holding of key positions in the Party must be seen as one of the most important indirect causes to his rise to power as the leader of the Soviet Union. This view is definitely shared by structuralist historians such as E.H. Carr in "The Bolshevik Revolution". They argue that Stalin inherited a "bureaucratic machine" that favored people like him to be leaders and the old values of the Tsarist bureaucracy were no doubt still lingering in the USSR at the time. No doubt an author has compared Stalin to "the Red Tsar". Stalin's colleagues might have been right that all the work that Stalin did was tedious but they were completely wrong if they thought it was useless. The reason for that is by having a complete control of the organization of the Party, Stalin was able to appoint his own supporters to key positions in the party. With that sort of power, Stalin could easily increase the amount of support for him and decrease the support for his rivals. Later on during the struggle against both the Left and the Right, voting played a decisive role and at that point, Stalin's control of the Party members proved to be absolutely vital to his victory in the votes. As some would say, Stalin's victory was also the triumph of the bureaucracy. ...read more.


Not only this shows that the power to control voters was important, it shows that Stalin had a unique grasp of what the people wanted and was responsive to the mood of the times therefore he always had many people favoring his policies. "Socialism in One Country" can be of a great example. The Soviet people who were mainly Russians favored this rather than "Permanent Revolution" as advocated by Trotsky since it gave Russia a special historic role and it appealed to Russian nationalism. It is now clear why it was Stalin who emerged as the powerful leader of the Soviet Union in 1928 but not any of his opponents. Firstly, Stalin was a strong figure, a shrewd politician who knew how to get essential support and knew how to "play his cards" at the right time. He was brutally determined to become the sole leader of the country at any sacrifices. On the contrary, his rivals on both the Left and the Right not only lacked the political cunning which Stalin had in abundance, they failed to grasp reality and thus underestimated him and gave him all the opportunities to strike back at them. And finally, one must not forget that only because Lenin and Sverdlov had already died, there was an empty post for the leadership of the Soviet Union. ?? ?? ?? ?? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate History section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate History essays

  1. Comparison between Trotsky's and Lenin's role in the establishment of the USSR

    The policy of War Communism that began in June 1918, was enforced by the Supreme Economic Council, known as the Vesenkha. Under War Communism, all industry was nationalized and strict centralized management was introduced, state monopoly on foreign trade was introduced, discipline for workers was strict, and strikers could be shot.

  2. Lenin's Role in Creation of USSR

    However once the revolution was successful and Lenin ruled over Russia, his role became more and more important. This can already be seen in his role played in ending Russia's involvement in the First World War. The Germans represented the major threat to the new government after the revolution and

  1. Rise of Castro and Stalin

    Both Castro's and Stalin's policies laid the foundation for which they gained popularity and rose within their respective single party states. A crucial aspect in the rise of both Castro and Stalin was their propaganda. The main difference between their respective propaganda lay in the fact hat Castro needed no

  2. To what extent did nationalism contribute to the creation and expansion of the Indochinese ...

    to A.D. 938; the Han dynasty extended its political control over the Vietnamese people. Even though the Vietnamese absorbed many of Chinese culture (Confucianism, 'Mandate of Heaven', Chinese-style bureaucratic government and Chinese system of rice cultivation), Vietnam's own culture remained strong and the "determination to be free of Chinese control never died"4.

  1. USSR under Stalin

    The scale of the collectivization and moreover its timing must be huge and very intensive as for around eleven years almost 100 percent of the USSR is collectivised. 2. Compare and Contrast the views on collectivisation expressed in Sources B and C Both Source B and C are very similar

  2. IB History HL, Extended Notes: Russia, the Tsars, the Provisional Govenment and the Revolution.

    Guchkov (Minister of War and Navy)- Resigned when his policy of continuing the war to victory was opposed by the Petrograd Soviet. Pro-Tsar White. 4. Kerensky (Minister of Justice)- Former Trudovik, joined SRs during the February Revolution. Link between the PG and Petrograd Soviet.

  1. IB, Paper 1: USSR under Stalin, 1924-1941. Analysis of sources.

    The purpose of this source is to show why Stalin in the end had little opposition for him becoming the General Secretary of the Party. The value of this source is that Joffe had a good understanding of what was going on in politics, as her father was a close friend of Trotsky.

  2. How successful was Khrushchev as Soviet Leader?

    The effects of the secret speech, in particular the undermining of party security, translated to the population as well; a popular poem from the time described ?we built upon granite, but now the stone crumbles, dissolves and melts at our feet?.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work