• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why was it possible for Stalin to become the leader of the USSR?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

HISTORY ESSAY OUTLINE WHY WAS IT POSSIBLE FOR STALIN TO BECOME THE LEADER OF THE USSR? I. Introduction: * Struggle for leadership proved that the most brutal and cunning would always win - Stalin * Explain briefly that Stalin's rise to power was not simple and effortless * State the research question and link to the body part II. Body: * Some historians give "luck" a big role in Stalin's rise to power (eg: death of Lenin, Sverdlov) => Give a counter-claim as to why luck was not so significant. * Explain why Stalin's rise to power was mostly due to his position as the General Secretary * Explain how the "Soviet bureaucratic machine" favored Stalin instead of others => Historian E. H. Carr => Structuralist school * Explain how his personal qualities allowed him to defeat his political rivals => Historian R. Conquest => "Liberal School" - Stalin's colleagues underestimated him and gave him chance to strike deadly blows * Explain how Stalin's political rivals lacked the skills to defeat him => Trotsky although intellectually superior, was not popular among equals => Trotsky for various reasons, was unfit for internal political struggles like this => Zinoviev and Kamenev made critical mistakes during the struggle for power * Stalin had an unique grasp of what the majority wanted so his policies were popular III. ...read more.

Middle

In my view, his holding of key positions in the Party must be seen as one of the most important indirect causes to his rise to power as the leader of the Soviet Union. This view is definitely shared by structuralist historians such as E.H. Carr in "The Bolshevik Revolution". They argue that Stalin inherited a "bureaucratic machine" that favored people like him to be leaders and the old values of the Tsarist bureaucracy were no doubt still lingering in the USSR at the time. No doubt an author has compared Stalin to "the Red Tsar". Stalin's colleagues might have been right that all the work that Stalin did was tedious but they were completely wrong if they thought it was useless. The reason for that is by having a complete control of the organization of the Party, Stalin was able to appoint his own supporters to key positions in the party. With that sort of power, Stalin could easily increase the amount of support for him and decrease the support for his rivals. Later on during the struggle against both the Left and the Right, voting played a decisive role and at that point, Stalin's control of the Party members proved to be absolutely vital to his victory in the votes. As some would say, Stalin's victory was also the triumph of the bureaucracy. ...read more.

Conclusion

Not only this shows that the power to control voters was important, it shows that Stalin had a unique grasp of what the people wanted and was responsive to the mood of the times therefore he always had many people favoring his policies. "Socialism in One Country" can be of a great example. The Soviet people who were mainly Russians favored this rather than "Permanent Revolution" as advocated by Trotsky since it gave Russia a special historic role and it appealed to Russian nationalism. It is now clear why it was Stalin who emerged as the powerful leader of the Soviet Union in 1928 but not any of his opponents. Firstly, Stalin was a strong figure, a shrewd politician who knew how to get essential support and knew how to "play his cards" at the right time. He was brutally determined to become the sole leader of the country at any sacrifices. On the contrary, his rivals on both the Left and the Right not only lacked the political cunning which Stalin had in abundance, they failed to grasp reality and thus underestimated him and gave him all the opportunities to strike back at them. And finally, one must not forget that only because Lenin and Sverdlov had already died, there was an empty post for the leadership of the Soviet Union. ?? ?? ?? ?? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate History section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate History essays

  1. Rise of Castro and Stalin

    of the Democratic government and thus prevent the Democratic government from fulfilling the aims of the revolution. Castro then denied all accusations of having any power. Thus both men used their pre-power positions to weaken the government and increase their support.

  2. Comparison between Trotsky's and Lenin's role in the establishment of the USSR

    However, as D. Thatcher suggests, the role of Trotsky during the civil war is not to be exaggerated. So it is fair to say that Lenin's policy was likely to be more important in keeping the Bolsheviks in power than Trotsky's efforts, although they were very important.

  1. Lenin's Role in Creation of USSR

    All in all Lenin's role in the October Revolution was not that important. Although he was leading the party and was the most important theorist, the main character in the organisation and execution of the revolution was Leon Trotsky. Stalin, who admits that it was mainly dues to Trotsky's not Lenin's achievements that the Bolshevik revolution succeeded, underlines this.

  2. Hitler vs. Stalin: Who is a more destructive leader in terms of religious groups?

    (Kimel, Direct Causes of the Holocaust). These factors do not explain Hitler's irrational actions during his reign which is why many believe his medical condition was the cause of the Holocaust. Stalin's Rise to Power Hitler vs. Stalin (1090 094)

  1. The USSR under Lenin

    Men were given preference over women - all in all the percentage of women in employment in 1929 was the same as in 1913.There were however examples for the altogether more liberal attitude of Russian society towards women's rights and sexuality - the People's Commissar for Social Welfare, Alexandra Kollontai (a woman!)

  2. IB History HL, Extended Notes: Russia, the Tsars, the Provisional Govenment and the Revolution.

    Worked to organize the war effort under the Tsar and supported the idea of a decentralized system of government. 2. Milyukov (Minister of Foreign Affairs)- real force in government, originally wanted British-style constitutional monarchy but was forced out of government over disagreement over WWI and then supported a military government so save Russia from the Soviet system.

  1. IB, Paper 1: USSR under Stalin, 1924-1941. Analysis of sources.

    This shows that Stalin was gaining popularity outside the party as well by also increasing its support; this is not seen in source A. 3. The origin of source B come from an interview with Nadezhda Joffe during the late 1990's and talk about other politician's view of Stalin.

  2. Is there any suspicion with regard to the death of Vladimir Lenin, the undisputed ...

    This along with lots of other undercover conspiracies, the relationship souring with Joseph Stalin, other rivals in the field, all this and the potential reason of conspiracy murder cannot be ruled out by any means. Over period of time people have investigated into this topic and tried bringing out the possible reasons that might have contributed to the death.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work