• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why was Stalin successful in becoming the next leader of the USSR?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Why was Stalin successful in becoming the next leader of the USSR? Stalin was successful in becoming the new leader of the USSR for many complex reasons. Firstly, the divisions within the party, made his task of eliminating people less complicated, he only had individuals, not groups of people against him. Moreover he knew perfectly how to manipulate people on his behalf and also how to gain supporters and how to get out of the way his opponents. But one of the main factors for his success was that members of the party did not realize that Stalin was to be more than the General Secretariat they saw him as a treat when it was too late. The personality of Stalin was quite important for his emerging as a leader of the Soviet Union. His understanding of Marxism was not excellent; however he had other qualities that helped him through his rise to power. Stalin was very determinate, he knew what he wanted and also he could visualize how to achieve it. Also he was able to use the structure of the party for his success because he knew how everything worked since he had much experience in many roles. ...read more.

Middle

Stalin knew this and so he knew that the more he talked about following Lenin's ideas, the more the people would like him, the more popular he was going to be and therefore the smoother his rising was going to be. The testament of Lenin was hidden. The desire of power of Stalin, made him to hide the existence of a document redacted by Lenin himself in which he attacks Stalin saying that he was ruthless and too ambitious so that he must had been away from power and consequently he could not be the new leader. If this had not happen, Stalin would have had much more trouble for getting to the power since Lenin criticized him very much. However criticism was not only for him. In general Lenin was criticising all important members of the party, which makes us think that it was not only that Lenin did not want Stalin to become the leader of the part but that he did not want any of them to do it. Instead, probably he wanted them all working as a team together and the criticism was made to show that none of them was good enough for taking all the responsibility and also because he was particularly afraid of Stalin becoming the leadership in the party. ...read more.

Conclusion

was where he thought it was more convenient to be, but which also shown his lack of devotion to the ideas of the party. Even though, many Bolsheviks saw him as the most likely candidate for the leader's role. Whereas the idea of Stalin being leader was not in their minds until they could not do anything. Stalin was sub estimated for many members of the Bolshevik party. He was seen as a simple administrator and his personality was not very impressive. However he knew how to make the most of the opportunities he had to make himself more popular and also to be really into the party so that he could aspire to the leadership of the party. Though General Secretariat was a very important position within the party, he wanted more and it was his desire of power and his skills as well as his cunning that made him to take an advantage of all changes in the party; moreover he removed people who he considered a threat out of his way. Thus, Stalin thinks carefully how to make to become the next leader of the Communist party as well as the new leader of the USSR by using his experience as well as unique opportunities until he finally achieves it. Alejandra Cossio Martinez ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate History section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate History essays

  1. Hitler vs. Stalin: Who is a more destructive leader in terms of religious groups?

    Several of these examples will be used. Some will be from people who Stalin effected and some will be from people who Hitler effects. All of these examples will be compared and contrasted to help determine who was a more destructive leader.

  2. The USSR under Lenin

    The attempts on increasing the number of women in employment remained unsuccessful - many women had taken up industrial work during the war (47% of women were in employment in 1917), but were discharged from their jobs as the soldiers returned after the Civil War.

  1. Why was it possible for Stalin to become the leader of the USSR?

    past as he had formidable challenges from both "Leftists" such as Kamenev, Zinoviev and especially Trotsky who is arguably intellectually superior to him and the "Right" led by Nikolai Bukharin. Though faced challenging oppositions, Stalin still claimed his victory. This essay thus is an attempt to uncover the reasons why

  2. How Successful was the Dayton Peace Agreement in Bringing Sustainable Governance to Bosnia and ...

    Bosniaks were in doubt over the constitutional changes while the Serbs feared that any change would put them in a worse position (Cohen 143). This can be viewed as a 'prisoner's dilemma' facing the Bosnian People and with which ethnicity became a central political issue (Dyker 99).

  1. How successful was Khrushchev as Soviet Leader?

    This public denigration of the once revered leader was a key aspect of de-Stalinisation, characterised by the Leader?s Secret Speech in 1956. This secret speech had ulterior motives; a large part of Khrushchev?s motivation for it was the opportunity it presented to discredit his political rivals.

  2. Is there any suspicion with regard to the death of Vladimir Lenin, the undisputed ...

    of his rivals in later years, therefore this act can be contributed to his skills and silencing of his critiques. Lurie?s claim strengthened by solid claims: Further claims of Lurie can be verified through number of evidences. While Trotsky?s last days revelation was a major one, the more practical one

  1. Why did Stalin rather than Trotsky emerge as the leader of the USSR in ...

    However, the Testament was never to be published thanks to Stalin?s political skill and formation of a ?Triumvirate? with the left-wing Zinoviev and Kamenev, who then persuaded Lenin?s widow to maintain its confidentiality, for fear of strengthening Trotsky?s position with its publication.

  2. Revision notes - All about Stalin

    enrolment: New members of the B were poorly educated --> were there to be loyal --> Stalin had more supporters - Lenin legacy: cult of personality - - POWER STRUGGLE - Politburo --> main cabinet of the ruling committee --> Stalin, Trotsky, Kamenev, Zinoviev...

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work