• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why was the USA unable to defeat communism in south East Asia in the years 1965-73?

Extracts from this document...


Why was the USA unable to defeat communism in south East Asia in the years 1965-73? In the 1950's the United States began to send troops to Vietnam. During the following 25-years the ensuing war would create some of the strongest tensions in US history. Thousands of men and women were sent thousands of miles to fight for a questionable cause. Out of fear of the spread of communism, the USA spent millions of dollars in hopes of containing communism. But where did it all go wrong? Inasmuch effort as the Americans put in and even as they were seen as a super power, they still faced defeat in south east Asia. In this essay I will discuss reasons why the USA was unable to defeat communism in south east Asia in the years 1960-73. The USA used a wide range of tactics throughout their occupation in Vietnam. These only seemed to get more and more intense from 1965 onwards. The USA were more advanced in their weapons, they possessed vast amounts of air power as well as on the ground. However, this proved to not work at the best of their advantage. On the 7th of February 1965, Johnson approved operation rolling thunder. This operation started in an effort to demoralise the north Vietnamese people and to undermine the capacity of the government. ...read more.


A student demonstration against the Vietnam war on the 4th of may 1970 at Kent state university is one that turned a lot of hearts away from the war. Four students were shot by an Ohio national guard and nine were wounded leaving one paralyzed. The event triggered a nationwide student strike that forced hundreds of colleges and universities to close. Not only were there public protests, but some members of the congress were against further involvement in Vietnam and were opposed to Nixon's ideas. This also played an important role because without support from congress, Nixon's position was much weakened. Without them it was going to be difficult for him to continue funding the war. Years following the tet offensive also further increased opposition within the USA and it was a period of a turning point in the war. The Tet offensive was widespread attacks launched on the cities of south Vietnam and against the US embassy on the 30th January 1968 by the communists. The objective of this was to lure the US troops into the more remote areas of Vietnam while at the same time causing maximum disruption in the cities and urban centres. The Tet offensive had a big effect on the US being unable to defeat communism. ...read more.


Although He strongly favoured the increase of military actions against the Communists and supported any US action, corruption was widespread throughout his government and it excited little enthusiasm. Clearly the leadership within south Vietnam was not as strong as that of the north, there was no unity among the leadership and this can be seen with the coups (diem was assassinated by his own people) and also the leadership failed to win the hearts of the Vietnamese people. They were very unpopular and this was very dangerous because it left the civilians vulnerable to communists who offered them what their leaders could not. Having looked at some of the very important factors .that may have led to the defeat of the US to communism such as poor leadership, ineffective tactics, opposition and the Tet offensive, the US simply did not want to win as much as the north Vietnamese. The US may have won in terms of numbers of their own soldiers dead which was much less than any other country that was involved and it may have had better advantage over its opponents in terms of weapons and machinery (air power), however, politically and psychologically it was a great defeat. The north Vietnamese were more tactful and more determined to win this war, they were fighting for a cause which was understood and supported by the majority of the Vietnamese and as a result, their resilience led to their victory. ?? ?? ?? ?? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate History section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate History essays

  1. The Fear of Communism and its Effects on Australia in the 1950s and 60s. ...

    All the following nations were part of the treaty which was made to provide defense as well as economic assistant in the Southeast Asia and South Pacific area. Although this was the purpose of the treaty, it wasn't obligated for any nation to assist the other nations against a military threat.

  2. US and the Vietnam War

    the North, they thought they had enough ammunition to start a war against Vietnam. However, the United States did not realize that "The politics in South Vietnam were full of corrupt diplomats who were working on the inside along with other diplomats who were full of undemocratic ideas."

  1. Cold War Study Guide - Compare/contrast the Vietnam War policies of Lyndon Johnson and ...

    - Nixon was facing public protest in the US. Anti-war protesters did not respond well to the increasing involvement in Vietnam. Because of the protest, Nixon began to withdraw troops from Vietnam. - Nixon was also faced with other issues at home (in the US), he focused on creating environmental programs that would benefit the country as a whole.

  2. How far do you agree the Tet Offensive was a turning point in the ...

    and that the Vietcong had the ability to hit many targets simultaneously (Forrest). The Tet offensive did make America begin the de-escalation process within Vietnam, but because the Communists were eventually "driven back from the cities" (Sanders) the Tet Offensive was a military victory for America.

  1. IB Extended Essay - How where the Conquistadors able to defeat the Incan and ...

    developed countries of the time with an economy that was greatly improving. The Black Death was an extreme epidemic that spread across Europe, but the Aztecs or Incas of the Americas had never had been exposed to disease which eventually spelled disaster for both empires because they had no immunity or resistance built up.

  2. Interwar Years: 1919-39

    another aspect of the settlement that German critics were quick to seize on and label inconsistent. * Indeed, the famous economist, John Maynard Keynes labelled the terms of the treaty, a "Carthegian peace" meaning that it would result in all-out pandemonium.

  1. Extended Essay History: How did the US media reporting of the Vietnam War out ...

    The article uses words such as "pre-meditated" and "mass murder" to convey the opinion of the journalist. However, there were other opinions about the incident at the time. For example, A B C's Howard K. Smith said "'My Lai was for Americans an exceptional horror ....

  2. History IA: What were American peoples responses to the Vietnam War in 1965 1971?

    Women Women?s International League for Peace and Freedom was the first organization that pioneered in the anti-war protest[4]. After the start of B-52 bombing missions, Helga Alice Herz, a Holocaust survivor, founding member of Women's Strike for Peace (WSP)

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work