• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why was the USA unable to defeat communism in south East Asia in the years 1965-73?

Extracts from this document...


Why was the USA unable to defeat communism in south East Asia in the years 1965-73? In the 1950's the United States began to send troops to Vietnam. During the following 25-years the ensuing war would create some of the strongest tensions in US history. Thousands of men and women were sent thousands of miles to fight for a questionable cause. Out of fear of the spread of communism, the USA spent millions of dollars in hopes of containing communism. But where did it all go wrong? Inasmuch effort as the Americans put in and even as they were seen as a super power, they still faced defeat in south east Asia. In this essay I will discuss reasons why the USA was unable to defeat communism in south east Asia in the years 1960-73. The USA used a wide range of tactics throughout their occupation in Vietnam. These only seemed to get more and more intense from 1965 onwards. The USA were more advanced in their weapons, they possessed vast amounts of air power as well as on the ground. However, this proved to not work at the best of their advantage. On the 7th of February 1965, Johnson approved operation rolling thunder. This operation started in an effort to demoralise the north Vietnamese people and to undermine the capacity of the government. ...read more.


A student demonstration against the Vietnam war on the 4th of may 1970 at Kent state university is one that turned a lot of hearts away from the war. Four students were shot by an Ohio national guard and nine were wounded leaving one paralyzed. The event triggered a nationwide student strike that forced hundreds of colleges and universities to close. Not only were there public protests, but some members of the congress were against further involvement in Vietnam and were opposed to Nixon's ideas. This also played an important role because without support from congress, Nixon's position was much weakened. Without them it was going to be difficult for him to continue funding the war. Years following the tet offensive also further increased opposition within the USA and it was a period of a turning point in the war. The Tet offensive was widespread attacks launched on the cities of south Vietnam and against the US embassy on the 30th January 1968 by the communists. The objective of this was to lure the US troops into the more remote areas of Vietnam while at the same time causing maximum disruption in the cities and urban centres. The Tet offensive had a big effect on the US being unable to defeat communism. ...read more.


Although He strongly favoured the increase of military actions against the Communists and supported any US action, corruption was widespread throughout his government and it excited little enthusiasm. Clearly the leadership within south Vietnam was not as strong as that of the north, there was no unity among the leadership and this can be seen with the coups (diem was assassinated by his own people) and also the leadership failed to win the hearts of the Vietnamese people. They were very unpopular and this was very dangerous because it left the civilians vulnerable to communists who offered them what their leaders could not. Having looked at some of the very important factors .that may have led to the defeat of the US to communism such as poor leadership, ineffective tactics, opposition and the Tet offensive, the US simply did not want to win as much as the north Vietnamese. The US may have won in terms of numbers of their own soldiers dead which was much less than any other country that was involved and it may have had better advantage over its opponents in terms of weapons and machinery (air power), however, politically and psychologically it was a great defeat. The north Vietnamese were more tactful and more determined to win this war, they were fighting for a cause which was understood and supported by the majority of the Vietnamese and as a result, their resilience led to their victory. ?? ?? ?? ?? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate History section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate History essays

  1. The Fear of Communism and its Effects on Australia in the 1950s and 60s. ...

    Even so, ANZUS wasn't the only agreement Australia had signed to be part of. The SEATO agreement was later signed on September 8, 1954. The Southeast Asia Treaty Organization involved Australia, France, the UK, New Zealand, Pakistan, The Philippines, Thailand, and the US.

  2. US and the Vietnam War

    with the Vietnam's guerilla warfare, the movement along the Ho Chi Minh Trail, and the establishment of the Anti-War Movement. The United States was not aware of "the weak institutions in South Vietnam." (The History Place) When the United States had discovered the communist ideas that were being spread in

  1. Interwar Years: 1919-39

    * The schedule for payments was communicated to Germany in May 1921, including a requirement for Germany to pay �50 million immediately. * Initially, Germany delivered what was demanded of it but in December the German government asked for postponement of payments due in January and February 1922.

  2. Cold War Study Guide - Compare/contrast the Vietnam War policies of Lyndon Johnson and ...

    The senate agreed 98-2 that Johnson would be given the power to attack without an official declaration of war. - The resolution was unanimous in the House of Representatives. - The resolution gave Johnson the official power to wage war in Vietnam however he would like.

  1. History IA: What were American peoples responses to the Vietnam War in 1965 1971?

    Though initial reports stated that the operation killed 100 enemy soldiers in March 1968, it was revealed a year later that First Lt. William Calley and his taskforce had killed up to 350 South Vietnamese civilians[21]. The negative coverage of the war influenced both politicians and the public because of the mass media?s power especially in television and newspaper[22].

  2. The Great Depression in the USA.

    Anyway , on the other hand it can be said that it did not achieve everything What Roosevelt expected . Some of the measures failed , such as ?The Farmers? and some of them didn?t achieve expected results . Still , in the period of Roosevelt presidency government placed a

  1. The Westeinde is one of the higher parts of The Hague, and the story ...

    some slight compensation, perhaps, for being the lawful wife of an important citizen. lt is a recorded fact that Catherine de Chasseur was executed on April 11, 1541 in the Gevangenpoort by the gruesome method of the water death - filled with water until she expired. Her accomplices were beheaded.

  2. How far did the Japanese Occupation change the lives of the people in Southeast ...

    Local resistance movements that went beyond ideological differences were formed during the Japanese Occupation, such as the MPAJA in Malaya and the Vietminh in Vietnam, which appealed to communists and non-communists alike, and made the fight for freedom a greater reality for the vast majority of the local population who had been previously politically apathetic towards anti-colonialist struggles.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work