Age of Innocence Commentary

Authors Avatar

I’m not a Simpleton

The Age of Innocence, passage commentary pg 34-35 

        The Age of Innocence by Edith Wharton was published in Europe during a time of profound and permanent changes (1920’s), but ironically its set in 1870’s aristocratic New York rigid society that is in many ways the antithesis of modern Europe. The Age of Innocence, then, stands as a study and critic of Old New York that saw itself as the pinnacle of civilization, but Wharton undercuts this picture by comparing its stiff societal customs to those of the most primitive tribes. The passage (pg 34-35) relates to the critic of Wharton, explicitly in the theme of love; described in third person omniscient the fragment focuses on Archer’s thoughts about to what extent is his fiancé, May, is an “artificial product” of Old New York Society. Through the use of violent diction, tribal images, the allusion to other literary novels, and the images of May; Archer attempts to move away his frank love for May, mentally, from the society of “mystifications”, but however, when the cards are down, he realizes that she is just another finished product of it.

Newland’s violent diction towards Old New York society expresses his rejection towards it. Newland, verbally attacks Old New York’s rituals with the intentions of backing away his “sincere” love for May from the phoniness and artificiality of it. Words such as “artificial”, “fictitious purity”, “is not” “simpleton”, “ass”, and “smashing” echo through the entire passage, which draw and enhance Newland’s critiques against the, “elaborate system of mystification”. Newland uses “ass” and “simpleton” to describe Larry Lefferts and Gertrude in a clear and bold indication that he and May are not like them, characters of the system of Old New York. The violent diction that Newland uses is strong and concrete, nothing like the “hieroglyphics” or “arbitrary signs” that Old New Yorkers use. Like this Archer bashes out of the mysterious ways of the system and critics it “frankly” and “sincerely”, like his love for May. Moreover, Archer continues his critique of Old New York society by describing it with tribal diction.            

Join now!

The tribal images with which Newland describes the rituals of Old New York society show his disgust for it. These tribal descriptions are used as a way to place his love for May in a higher ground than that of the tribal Old New York. Firstly, Newland describes Old New York society as a “hieroglyphic world” or a “system of mystifications”. Both descriptions lower the refined status of New York society. No longer is it bright and elegant, but inscrutable and foggy like hieroglyphics and mysterious systems. Newland does this deliberate to create a clear contrast between hazy Old Society and ...

This is a preview of the whole essay