• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Compare the play Pygmalion with its film version my fair lady. Which do you find more effective work of art and why. Use quotes

Extracts from this document...


Compare the play Pygmalion with its film version my fair lady. Which do you find more effective work of art and why. Use quotes Pygmalion written by Bernard Shaw, was first performed on stage with Rex Harrison as Henry Higgins. The reception of the audience during the play was of utmost disappointment due to the non romantic ending of the play, even though those were Shaw's initial intentions. My Fair Lady on the other hand is a musical based on Pygmalion, and the movie was shot in 1964 by director George Cukor. Although there are numerous similarities between musical and play such as the character interactions or how both of them portray social status, especially in the conclusion, the musical displays several contradictions in comparison to the movie. Bernard Shaw wrote the play during an important moment in history, which was when women were starting to gain independence in the beginning of the 20th century. It is produced in 1914 which is when WW1 broke out and war time made it easier for women to find work, and soon after women got their independent vote in 1920. Thus Pygmalion has a strong sense of feminism and independence as one of the leading themes to guide the characters on, especially Eliza. Eliza throughout the play is striving to prove how women should be independent and not rely on men in order to lead a life. Both movie and play shows us that when Higgins turns Eliza into a duchess, he didn't give her just class and status but he took her independence away because she is "not fit to sell anything else". ...read more.


Higgins, she has a flawless English however lacks a decent background, manners and taste. Thus social class is a combination of all of these and Pickering is the one who gives her the rest of her social class in addition to the language given by Higgins. So language also has an important role as shown in Higgins song "why cant the English?" where he says that Eliza is "condemned by every syllable that she utters". In the year 300 b.c. Aristotle made it clear that a tragedy usually ends in death and a comedy ends in marriage. Throughout the play, Bernard Shaw leads the characters in believing that Eliza will end up marrying Higgins or someone with very great richness, when in fact, Shaw does not follow Aristotle's rule and he breaks the whole build up of expectations that the audience had while watching the play. In contrast the film ends with Eliza entering Higgins' room and his ending line is "where the hell are my slippers" so the film allows us to believe they don't get married, it only hints it, and that if they do, he will be a dominant person in their relationship. However when Shaw wrote the play, and the movie changes his initial reasons of writing the ending the way he did, Shaw wanted to show that people who don't marry, such as Higgins, aren't disintegrated from their parents because they put their parents in high pedestals, which is also known as Oedipus tragedy. ...read more.


Even though she says quite firmly she would teach phonetics, it is obvious for the audience that teaching phonetics is not what she really wanted. So what the movie shows more clearly is that Eliza does indeed have options and that Higgins is afraid he will be without her. So what makes the ending of this movie such an attraction to the audience is that Eliza comes back to Higgins as a choice of her own and not as a need. Which is in fact exactly what Higgins likes: a person who makes their decisions based on rational thinking and not on weakness. In conclusion the film has added and taken away certain characteristics of the play, but this does not mean that one is better than the other, it only means that the author and the director had different propositions in mind as to what they wanted to show their audience. One could say that the main obvious difference between the play and the movie are the songs. The songs entertain the public and thus they are more appealed because it follows' a movies characteristics of those days, in addition it emphasizes Shaw's initial ideas of what the characters felt leading to the main themes of the play. For example when Eliza is in the market and she wished for comfort, warmth and chocolate. However the disadvantage is that the main theme of the play which is a criticism to high classes is lost, thus songs lose the main themes and makes the story appear more Hollywood like instead of being based on a book. ?? ?? ?? ?? Stephanie Mueller L6 HL English 29/09/08 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate Languages section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate Languages essays

  1. The Use of Motives in The Outsider and Woman at Point Zero

    The symbolism of the sun however, can also be approached from a completely different angle because another variable is equally suitable. The sun may also be interpreted metaphorically as the force of society on Meursault. A society is usually regarded as a group of people that for one part has

  2. In what ways and to what effect, does Milton use comparison in Paradise Lost ...

    the new race of man is "To be created like to us, though less In power an excellence, but favoured more Of him who rules above;" (II.349-351) Also, Milton's geographical description of hell has similar physical features as earth (Mountains, rivers, valleys), however, the only difference is that hell has the worst in nature.

  1. World Literature: Compare and contrast the changes in the character of Baldini in Perfume ...

    The shadow that Hermann had always casted on him is reflected by the fact that Kafka portrays Mr. Samsa as a dominating character after his transformation. This gives us an insight to why Kafka has let Mr. Samsa thrive in the end despite the latter's evil towards his son.

  2. Articles of VN War

    Cung d� c� mot v�i ph�c tr�nh n�i rang, c� mot v�i b�i nhac phan chi�n cua TCS, nhac cua TCS nhung loi cua Phan Duy Nh�n. Phan Duy Nh�n l� mot sinh vi�n, c�n bo cong san. T�i nho kh�ng l�m th� y d� bi bat v� giam tai

  1. The manner in which Tarot cards play a role in the work of T.S. ...

    Also the fact that Madame Sosostris was famous as a clairvoyant, and considered wise indicates the popularity of tarot at the time. The Wasteland as a collection of modern poems enjoys great popularity. Before identifying similarities between both tarot cards and the works of Eliot, we need to understand what tarot cards are.

  2. 1984 - Film appreciation.

    positive against the regime, breaking the norms, the lighting of the scene is bright and lively. Also when he had an illicit affair with Julia at the Victory Square was illuminated. The setting was amidst lush green trees and under a bright blue sky.

  1. Do you consider the movie Outsourced to be a useful film to teach intercultural ...

    a useful film to teach intercultural communication, you always have to bear in mind, that the major purpose of such a film is to entertain the viewer.

  2. Christopher's Trip to the Dentist

    It took us 10 steps from the chairs we were sitting on until we reached the door where Mr Patel shook my hand and started talking to Father. He was telling Father about the appointment and I do not like it when people do not talk to me when they

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work