• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Hamlet Vs. King Lear

Extracts from this document...


Comparative Essay: Hamlet vs. King Lear King Lear and Hamlet are two of Shakespeare's greatest tragedies where he has developed complex characters that create more problems for themselves as a result of their natures. Both Hamlet and King Lear are protagonists who believe that things around them should be inherently good at all times and that people's motives and actions should always be truthful and fair. Nevertheless, within both novels we see different characteristics of these main characters as well that evidently separate them. Hamlet is a strong developed person who has difficulty coming to terms with any corrupt events that occur around him. He can be seen and noted as a very pessimistic and bitter minded individual; however, this attitude is mainly seen when he is attempting to suppress his hatred and fury towards the extreme events that have occurred in his life, this majorly referring to the death of his father. ...read more.


King Lear ultimately wants to divide his kingdom up between his three daughters; however, in order to receive the greatest amount of land, King Lear decided that it would be just for each of his daughters to proclaim their love for their father. King Lear, being blinded by his own arrogance, did not see that his two oldest daughters directly lied to his face when proclaiming their devotion towards him. It was only his youngest daughter, Cordelia, who spoke to her father with complete honesty, even though it led to her banishment from the kingdom. The fundamental part of Lear's error in judgment was that he only wanted to hear positive attributes about himself being exclaimed, and once he heard something remotely negative, he exploded with fury. He ends up giving away his land to his two eldest daughters, and later realizes that their intentions with it were completely selfish. ...read more.


With Hamlet, however, we see that the death of his father is one of the contributory factors that lead to the tragedies that followed along. Hamlet's inherent tendency to overanalyze all situations that he is presented with is the biggest cause of his isolation and his removal from all reality by the end of the play. As a result of this, we see that Hamlet's fatal flaw begins as something internal and carries out all throughout the play remaining untouched. Both characters, Hamlet and King Lear, possess characteristics and personality traits that lead them to their isolation and fear. Shakespeare brilliantly showed us that even a single fatal flaw within a character has the potential to ultimately lead them to extreme failure, and we see this characteristic especially within these two protagonists. Both of them started off inherently good, however, as a result of their failure to notice people's ungrateful and selfish characteristics, they ended up with nothing. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate Languages section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate Languages essays

  1. Role of Women in King Lear

    Shakespeare uses Goneril and Regan to represent the unnaturalness of filial ingratitude. Lear even goes to the extent of referring to them as animals, calling them "Tigers, not daughters" (4, ii, 40). These women can be seen as personifications of evil in the play.

  2. antigone - divine law vs human law

    She proves fully willing to do so not only because she believes it is morally and ethically right, but also because she bases her values on the divine law rather than on human law. When Polynieces corpse was not buried, the gods were insulted and angry since this was thought

  1. Sofokles vs Karvas

    U� v �vode trag�die sa stret�vame s postavou Antigony a jej odhodlan�m poru�it svetsk� z�kony. T�bsky panovn�k Kreon zak�zal pochovat jedn�ho z Antigoninych bratov, co antagonista odmieta pripustit. Napriek mno�stvu utrpen� je Antigona pripraven� vzdorovat osudu a vzopriet sa rozkazu kr�la.

  2. Sight and Blindness

    "The plague is you" is probably the simplest way of putting it without saying the actual words - you killed Liaos. However Oedipus is so blinded by rage that he doesn't believe it and instead thinks that Teiresias is plotting against him.

  1. Periodismo digital vs. Periodismo tradicional

    M�s adelante hablo del enfoque sist�mico y se enumeran las realizaciones y propuestas de los a�os 70 y 80 en el marco de la Investigaci�n en Sistemas, Conexionismo y Caos en sistemas Din�micos. Desde esta panor�mica, defino hist�ricamente lo que es la Vida Artificial.

  2. Historical Vietnam Events

    Mac d� trong me thuong con v� bo... b� tu nhu. Th�i con v� l� vui r�i v� n� di an toan l� duoc. N� lon r�i...n� d�u phai l� con cua m�nh nua. N� n�i ...d�ng. �uoc ph�n n�o th� cu vui ph�n �y.

  1. Christmas - origins, traditions and ideas for making gifts.

    You know someone who would just love to have one. Go ahead and give a gift from the East. Give a bonsai tree complete clippers, gloves and care instructions. While you're at it, get one for yourself. 51. Holidays mean food and reminiscing good times.

  2. King Lear commentary

    As for Edgar, his fortune changes because he transforms from a homeless beggar to an armored knight, challenging Edmund and regaining his titles and honor. The theme of order and chaos also dominates this passage. This was because, Edgar, the rightful inheritor of Gloucester was robbed of his titles and honor.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work