Genetic engineering has rapidly become a significant part of our lives. Everyday millions of people eat food that has been genetically manipulated and take new medications developed through the application of genetic engineering. As this point illustrates genetics is now a key component in many scientific fields; however, I would like to concentrate on a specific type that can change the very essence of who we are: the genetic engineering of humans.
The use of genetic engineering in humans promises some extraordinary benefits as well as presenting many ethical and moral dilemmas. From a medical view, it has the potential to improve the lives of humans who are suffering from genetic diseases. The Human Genome Project, completed in 2003, has provided us with a complete knowledge of our genes, enabling scientists in any research laboratory across the world to discover the gene responsible for a specific genetic disease and develop a way to treat it or eradicate it forever. Fourteen percent of children are born with a physical or mental problem caused by faulty genes. By studying our genes, scientists have the potential to find cures for these diseases, even such previously incurable ones such as Alheizemer’s and cancer. So why does a technology that can bring such benefits to our lives need to be regulated?
The answer to this question is simple: as a future issue, we do not yet know what consequences genetic engineering may bring. Many may think that it is illogical to create legislation regarding a technology that is still largely unknown, but previous experiences tell us that it is difficult to create an effective and comprehensive policy after a technology is in full-fledge. Therefore, we must find it in ourselves to act now while we have the opportunity.
One of the possible consequences of genetic engineering is the narrowing of the diversity of the human race. Genetic engineering for the enhancement of the human race can put an end to characteristics that are considered imperfect. It can be used by some for unsound purposes, such as the extinguishing of a race of people. Are we willing to give up the diversity that we have tried so hard to preserve for so long? We must debate the possible consequences of genetics and what they mean to very country so we can come to a consensus about how to develop an ethical code for the issue at hand.
The problem that this General Assembly is faced with is developing an ethical code for human genetic engineering. Genetic engineering has few limits with the exception of our imagination and the ones we find necessary to impose on it. Therefore, international policies have to be drawn up and ratified by all nations so as to set a guideline for a technology that can define the direction our lives take. In this hall we come from many different countries, ethnic groups, and races, but we must all aim toward building a better future for the generations who follow us.
Though my purpose is to highlight the importance of the creation of laws or policies that will guide human genetical engineering, you may wonder why I have not presented any solutions. It is my belief that at this moment we must first understand the importance and implications of human genetic engineering before we delve into any kind of legal process. The very trajectory of human life on earth can be altered by genomics.
But I must stress an important point. Speeches alone will not solve these dilemmas. Constant action has to be taken if we intend to come to a consensus we can all be in agreement with. Every day that passes hundreds of people die as a product of a genetic disease. We hold in our hands the ability to resolve the problems at hand and permit genetic engineering to reach its full potential without ethics or conflicting policies holding it back.
Genetic engineering has given us the power to alter the very basis of life on earth. Help us make sure that this change is for the best.
Thank you for your attention.
