Through the Len(TM)s of a Marxist: Pride and Prejudice

Authors Avatar

Page  of                 Sanjana Negi

Sanjana Negi

English – AA

Ms. Roach

April 5th 2009

Through the Len’s of a Marxist: Pride and Prejudice

        Jane Austen’s Pride and Prejudice is a plot driven novel, revolving around the importance of class and the obstacles it causes when the bourgeoisie and proletariats interact within society. This is directly in relation to the ideas of Karl Marx’s Marxist theory, which states that class is determined by it’s possession of materialistic things such as land and money or the lack thereof. In consequence of these differences,   essence, that society is driven by money, class and the economy and the lower class will be always oppressed and higher class will always be the oppressor.  This is reflected in the novel as a lot of the driving force in the plot focuses on class of all the characters and their relationship with the other class and the barriers class create. By analyzing some of the key passages and characters of the novel, it can be noted that many of the characteristics of Austen’s Victorian world, are very similar to Marx’s outlook on society and its behaviors especially that of society being unequal and as class discriminative as well.  

        

        The beliefs that Marx abhors of a money-driven society are first instilled in the reader by the loved first line of the novel  

‘It is a truth universally acknowledged that single a man in possession of a good fortune must be in want of a wife.’ (I,I,I).

        It is interesting to note that the statement only refers to “men in possession of a good fortune” and only they ‘should be in want of a decent wife’. This clearly demonstrates Marx’s model of an economical society as it clearly defines the importance of status and class as well as the difference in gender roles and their importance the men’s wants or status matters more in a relationship as opposed to the woman.  He explains that “And now as to myself, no credit is due to me for discovering the existence of classes in modern society or the struggle between them. Long before me bourgeois historians had described the historical development of this class struggle and bourgeois economists, the economic anatomy of classes. What I did that was new was to prove: that the existence of classes is only bound up with the particular, historical phases in the development of production, and that the class struggle necessarily leads to the dictatorship of the proletariat”.  Jane Austen’ text upholds Marx’s beliefs as it accurately portrays the oppressed and their helplessness as well as the oppressors and their prejudices.    

Join now!

While there are many characters that represent the oppressed, Mrs. Bennet is the greatest impact on the reader.  Austen uses Mrs. Bennet, as an epitome of the faults criticized in Marxism – as Mrs. Bennett’s only wish in life is to find very rich and high class husbands for her daughters. According to Mrs. Bennett, character, personality and love are undermined when compared to wealth or estates or other materialistic objects.  When she informs her husband about Mr. Bingley’s arrival, her only focus is the possibility of his hand in marriage for one of her daughters.

‘ “Why, ...

This is a preview of the whole essay