• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Area Under a Curve

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Shady Areas

Alex Kluivert

Math Methods II IB        5A

2 December 2008

In this investigation you will attempt to find a rule to approximate the area under a curve (i.e. between the curve and the x-axis) using trapeziums (trapezoids).

Consider the function g(x) = x2 + 3

The diagram below shows the graph of g.  The area under this curve from x = 0 to x = 1 is approximated by the sum of the area of two trapeziums.  

Find this approximation.

image21.pngimage20.pngimage18.pngimage19.pngimage09.pngimage17.pngimage00.pngimage01.png

A = ½ h(b1 + b2)

Trapezium A:

        b1: g(x) = x2 + 3                                        b2: g(x) = x2 + 3

g(0) = (0)2 + 3                                                    g(0.5) = (0.5)2 + 3

= 3                                                           = 3.25

AA = ½ (0.5)(3 + 3.25)

      AA = 1.5625

Trapezium B:

        b1: g(x) = x2 + 3                                        b2: g(x) = x2 + 3

g(0.5) = (0.5)2 + 3                                            g(1) = (1)2 + 3

                           = 3.25                                                        = 4

AB = ½ (0.5)(3.25 + 4)

                                      AB = 1.8125

Total Area:

A = AA + AB

A = 1.5625 + 1.8125

A = 3.375

Increase the number of trapeziums to five and find a second approximation for the area.

image18.pngimage17.png

image22.pngimage03.pngimage09.pngimage04.pngimage02.pngimage07.pngimage05.pngimage06.png

Trapezium A:

b1 : g(x) = x2 + 3                                        b2 : g(x) = x2 + 3

g(0) = (0)2 + 3                                                    g(0.2) = (0.2)2 + 3

                = 3                                                           = 3.04

AA = ½ (0.2)(3 + 3.04)

                                   AA = 0.604

Trapezium B:

b1 : g(x) = x2 + 3                                        b2 : g(x) = x2 + 3

g(0.2) = (0.2)2 + 3                                            g(0.4) = (0.4)2 + 3

                           = 3.04                                                           = 3.16

AB = ½ (0.2)(3.04 + 3.16)

                                   AB = 0.62

Trapezium C:

...read more.

Middle

With the help of technology, create diagrams showing and increasing number of trapeziums.  For each diagram, find the approximation for the area.  

What do you notice?

Number of

Trapeziums

Area – Manual

Calculations

Riemann Sum Application

Graph

SUM

2

3.375

  Y = x2 + 3

image24.pngimage08.png

                                             Y

      A                                   B

                        N

3.375

  A = 0

  B = 1

  N = 2

  T = 2

5

3.34

  Y = x2 + 3

image22.pngimage08.png

                                             Y

      A                                    B

                        N

3.34

  A = 0

  B = 1

  N =

  T = 2

10

  Y = x2 + 3

image25.png

                                             Yimage08.png

      A                                   B

S

                        N                                            

3.335

  A = 0

  B = 1

  N =

  T = 2

20

  Y = x2 + 3

                                             Yimage26.png

      A                                   B  

SDFSDFimage08.png

                        N

3.33375

  A = 0

  B = 1

  N = 2

  T = 2

  • First I calculated the area manually by hand.  Then I tested these results with the use of technology, which in this case was the Riemann Sum application on a TI-84+ silver edition .  Which I used to create the table above.

Observations:

The value of the sum continues to get more and more precise as the number of trapeziums under the curve increases.

Use the diagram below to find a general expression for the area under the curve of g

...read more.

Conclusion

(x0) + g(xn) + 2[g(xi)]

            2n    

x0 : g(x) = x4 + 16x + 2

g(0) = (0)4 + 16(0) + 2

               = 2

xn : g(x) = x4 + 16x + 2

g(1) = (1)4 + 16(1)

               = 19

x1 : g(x) = x4 + 16x + 2

g(0.25) = (0.25)4 + 16(0.25) + 2

                     = 6.00390625

x2: g(x) = x4 + 16x + 2

g(0.5) = (0.5)4 + 16(0.5) + 2

                  = 10.0625

x3: g(x) = x4 + 16x + 2

g(0.75) = (0.75)4 + 16(0.75) + 2

                     = 14.31640625

 = 1 – 0 (0 + 17 + 2[6.00390625 + 10.0625 + 14.31640625]

         2(4)    

     = 9.861328125

Calculator:

f(x)dx = 10.2

y = x5 + 30

 = xn – x0 (g(x0) + g(xn) + 2[g(xi)]

            2n    

x0 : g(x) = x5 + 30

g(0) = (0)5 + 30

               = 30

xn : g(x) = x5 + 30

g(1) = (1)5 + 30

               = 31

x1: g(x) = x5 + 30

g(0.25) = (0.25)5 + 30

                     = 30.000976563

x2: g(x) = x5 + 30

g(0.5) = (0.5)5 + 30

                  = 30.03125

x3: g(x) = x5 + 30

g(0.75) = (0.75)5 + 30

                     = 30.23730469

 = 1 – 0 (30 + 31 + 2[30.000976563 + 30.03125 + 30.23730469]

         2(4)    

     = 30.19238281

Calculator:

Y=  enter y = x5 + 25    2nd      TRACE      7     ENTER   graph displayed   0     ENTER

 1 S  ENTER S

f(x)dx = 30.166667

y = x + 2

          4

 = xn – x0 (g(x0) + g(xn) + 2[g(xi)]

            2n    

x0 : g(x) = x + 2

                          4

g(0) = (0) + 2

                          4

= ½

xn : g(x) = x + 2

                          4

g(1) = (1) + 2

                           4

= 3/4

x 1: g(x) = x + 2

                          4

g(0.25) = (0.25) + 2

                                     4

= 0.5625

x2 : g(x) = x + 2

                          4

g(0.5) = (0.5) + 2

                                 4

= 0.625

x3 : g(x) = x + 2

                          4

g(0.75) = (0.75) + 2

                                    4

= 0.6875

 = 1 – 0 (1/2 + 3/4 + 2[0.5625 + 0.625 + 0.6875]

         2(4)    

     = 0.625

Calculator:

f(x)dx = 0.625

Conclusion:

         My original calculations from my general statement seemed to be very close to the answers that I later found using a calculator. I do not believe that the shapes of the graphs have an effect on the approximation

...read more.

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate Maths section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate Maths essays

  1. Extended Essay- Math

    P��8� ,sK�FpV��Z*ol(r) �#7��8b(c)�BP�s@�n�=Õ�'V�I�4�� ˪���{e��E2k����"�& �"�3/4�5�1/4�Uc�����e�y%�� 2"I^p��}���O�Y�f5pdp9� ��r�$�w�W��B�)�_G@q�y>��?�9,��"�&�tt���4y�Æ��+-�hG�(tm)&P1/4�(��L 3/4��{�G]�t��K�qU�;^dZh�6m��uwÝ¢mÛ¶q�7P�...'�ݡ+* ���� sM���1/2��+9�(tm)�ؿ�/3/48ã5'�y� A"�.S�6/�--|��-�[ ��_��R"�'�:r_~���O?�!n��7�X�@�1/4�kp/{q� �>-,Y��)��p^�G�����(tm)7-��!��g�59 "�q���� %��~������/���'�W�-���v?��3c"s� l�1/49n\Ó�p�[o1/2� �J�H��?�S�p?�Y�h��"u��-�];��\���O�m��A ~��x( ]�b�Bi5�� dh<C-�/b ����k�0M��sV9��s0z��� �s�9���K/1/2T0W$�kY�K�^��[�Xo��L�����=z���شkrV'��?��q��%V���b"~�0��i�"�W�m3�x� �/���?q"�+2��E-\vp��1/4��Û�Æo(r)���<a��H8[S��-^"�|��� �%V�×��."�L@h��-���8�C1/4o(X�q! X =�wů�."������p"P"-hx>�X�n�-3/4�)$Yç{��x�1/2�� �%�"(r)�� ��_(tm)_��4=BZ%.��mb =_�@ `��B��o�D�r"�bK#")z��(tm)0�"�"(tm)+>��-"�+Pc<�5a�Ä0c�H�&!Kr�E�Ӻ6q/...�<nܸ�'Oyn�<>�]w]\K��pG�G��T"Ñ!HzCX1/4�� ���W���1/4l���[��.Q�h2 1M�@r�� 4Q�?3/4۱��-�<,��W�T��yij H��...sw5�rw^�Icp-p�b�ä­ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½"��ÉA -J�`Ó&) y�u��'����-��"�X��!��GM�ac-��"�h�D�u�...#�� ��b��;�kEhr�Xs�N�#y��A��J��q�',T�i�l�Y���v�a�q�¨ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½...1/2�Î'Ñ5 �%�9��1/2sNT��1/2r���F�jG�{ ��X�?Æ�8-T ��B"k$���×XEV!3�+V(r)Ù�@-�HpÄ-W'-)�H1/4�;2a�k&t�5nBS��;�t@><:bÍ7�^�)�5G���c3/4�rVT;Ϊ�1/2�}q' 7��l=Ut,G�Ŭ6��& �*�+G��+�6[`��h�Y #���Y{5Y0kn\�g�Qa�9[�7���[�+�s"�m3V!� 4��s��T�IEND(r)B`�PK !B�t�!D!Dword/media/image4.png�PNG IHDRp��{X�RiCCPICC Profilex�YwTͲ�(tm)�,KXr�9�s"�a�K�Q��"� H ���*��""(�PD@�PD$1/2A?�{�y��ys����v���� �JTT�@xD\��(tm)!��" ?n�:� ����F��Y#��\����5&�#�0�72�@��������k��~Q1q

  2. Investigating the Ratios of Areas and Volumes around a Curve

    For instance, if we use negative values of n, either 0<a<b or a<b<0 - 0 cannot be included in the region, as this would give infinite area. This proof uses the power rule, which does not apply when n=-1. To show that the relationship holds in this instance, we must

  1. Shady Areas. In this investigation you will attempt to find a rule to approximate ...

    TRAPEZIUM A [0, 0.5]: 1. h1: g(x) = x2 + 3 g(0) = (0)2 + 3 = 3 2. h2: g(x) = x2 + 3 g(0.5) = (0.5)2 + 3 = 3.25 3. b = 0.5 4. AA = (1/2)

  2. Investigating ratio of areas and volumes

    31.88 7.0 8 454.2 56.78 8.0 9 908.7 102.3 9.0 10 1837 186.1 10.0 ? 12.63 4.02 3.14 e 8.891 3.271 2.72 100 2.51E+30 2.51E+28 100 From these results it is evident that the conjecture holds true for the points between x = 1 and x = 2.

  1. The aim of this particular portfolio investigation is to find the area under a ...

    +(g(0.4) +g(0.6) 0.2)+(g(0.6) +g(0.8) 0.2)+(g(0.8)+g(1) 0.2) 2 2 2 2 2 = (( 3+ 3.04)+ ( 3.04+ 3.16)+( 3.16+ 3.36) +( 3.36+ 3.64)+ ( 3.64+ 4)) ..........factorizing = or 3.34 The area under the curve approximated using five trapeziums was closer to the actual value than when using only two trapeziums.

  2. Matrix Binomials ...

    24-1 = 23 = 8 = Although it appears that Zn = 2n-1(Z), we must check other values to determine that the equation does stay true. When n = 15 Z15 = (Z4)(Z4)(Z4)(Z3) = = Verifying with Zn = 2n-1(Z), Z15 = 215-1 = 214 = 16384 = When n = 9 Z9 = (Z4)(Z4)(Z)

  1. Approximations of areas The following graph is a curve, the area of this ...

    Remember the width or base is the same for all the trapezoids. Area of a trapezoid (1) Area of Trapezoid (2) Area of Trapezoid (3) A(2)= A(2)= .604 .620 Area of trapezoid (4) Area of trapezoid (5) 00 Again we add all Trapezoids to retrieve the approximated area of the graph.

  2. Area under curve

    + (1/2 (3.16+3.25) x 0.1) + (1/2 (3.25+3.36) x 0.1) + (1/2 (3.36+3.49) x 0.1) + (1/2 (3.49+3.64) x 0.1) + (1/2 (3.64+3.81) x 0.1) + (1/2 (3.81+4) x 0.1) = = 0.3005 + 0.3025 + 0.3065 + 0.3125 + 0.3205 + 0.3305 + 0.3425 + 0.3565 + 0.3725 + 0.3905 = 3.335 (4 significant figures were used to demonstrate the difference between n= 8, n= 10)

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work