• Join over 1.2 million students every month
• Accelerate your learning by 29%
• Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

# Logarithm Bases

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

## Logarithm Bases

In the beginning of this problem, we are given multiple sequences of logarithms, and are told to write down the next two terms of each sequence. Here is a table of the first sequence, including the next two terms and the numerical equivalence of each term:

 # of Term 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Term       Numerical Equivalence       I created the last two terms in this sequence, terms 6 and 7, simply by doubling the base of the logarithm for each term. In more proper mathematical terms, I used the formula  , where n is the number of the term. I noticed that each numerical equivalence seems to have 3 as the numerator, and the number of the term as the denominator. In this manner, I created a formula to find the numerical equivalence for the nth term of the sequence in the form  Middle Numerical Equivalence      I noticed that in both of these sequences as well, the numerical equivalences seem to have a constant integer as the numerator, and the number of the term as the denominator. Therefore, the formula for the first sequence is  , and the formula for the second sequence is  .

Now, we are asked to calculate a set of many logarithms, in the form  , where p and q are both integers. The set is as follows:

 Logarithm   Numerical Equivalence   Logarithm   Numerical Equivalence   Logarithm   Numerical Equivalence   Logarithm   Numerical Equivalence   Finding the numerical equivalences of the logarithms was very easy; I simply calculated them using a graphing calculator. The challenging part arose when I was asked to find a way to obtain the third answer in each row from the first two answers in each row. I was also told to let  and  , and to find a general statement that expresses  , in terms of c and d.

Conclusion

 Logarithm   Numerical Equivalence 2 -2 ERROR

This didn’t work, because c+d=0, and the general formula ended up with a 0 on the bottom. When I tried to solve the third logarithm using my calculator, it gave me an error message saying “Divide by 0”.  Therefore,  and  .

One more thing that I thought of was that x must be greater than 0, because of the definition of a logarithm. There is no possible way to get any number to equal 0 or any negative number using only exponents. Therefore,  .

I couldn’t think of any more limitations of the general statement. Here are the limitations that I came up with:     I will now repeat my general statement. If we let  and  , then  .

This statement only works with the limitations stated previously. It took me a lot of staring at the numbers and trying different values for a, b, and x, but eventually I discerned a pattern and arrived at my general statement.

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate Maths section.

## Found what you're looking for?

• Start learning 29% faster today
• 150,000+ documents available
• Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
• Join over 1.2 million students every month
• Accelerate your learning by 29%
• Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

# Related International Baccalaureate Maths essays

1. ## In this investigation I will be examining logarithms and their bases. The purpose of ...

To prove this theory I will create two more sequences which follow the same pattern as the sequences above. Then I will evaluate the terms to prove my theory. 1. log6216 log36216 log216216 = 3 = 1.5 or = 1 2.

2. ## Logarithms. In this investigation, the use of the properties of ...

= 3/5 After evaluating the logarithms, you can see that the denominator of each value is the same as the term number. Therefore the conclusion that the value of the sequence can be calculated by using the expression 3/n where n is the term number.

1. ## IB Pre-Calculus Logarithm Bases General Information: Logarithms A ...

This can only be tested using a calculator, so from the first sequence plug in ln 64/ ln 4, ln 64/ ln 8, and ln 64/ ln 32 all separately.

2. ## Logrithum bases

* Sequence 3: Log 5 25, Log 25 25, Log 125 25, Log 625 25, Log 3125 25, Log 15625 25... n 1 2 3 4 5 ... N p/q 2 1 2/3 1/2 2/5 ... ? I noticed that all have numerator as 3 in p/q in sequence 1.

1. ## Logarithm Bases - 3 sequences and their expression in the mth term has been ...

of the 2nd row has the expression: log3n 81 (this is because, the bases (b) of each of the terms in the sequence are powers of 3 while A, which is 81, remains the same for each term) = [Applying change of base formula] = [Substituting 81 as a power

2. ## Logarithm Bases

Second sequence: We only have to look at the first term to find the general statement; we can use the remaining terms to check that our form is correct. You can find the general term using any two consecutive terms from the sequence.

1. ## Logarithm Bases

That is, the power of 10 necessary to equal a given number. The common logarithm of x is written log x. For example, log 100 is 2 since 102 = 100. The base is understood to be ten. View the diagram in figure 9.

2. ## Logarithm Bases Portfolio

Let Log8512 =d; 8d=512(2^9)ï 23d=29 Hence d= 9/3 => d=3/1 2)Log2512 =e; 2e= 512ï 2e=29 Hence e=9/1 3)Log16512=f; 16f=512ï 24f=29 Hence f=9/4 General Trend : To obtain the third answer in each row the bases of the first two terms get multiplied to obtain the base of the third while the Argument remains the same throughout. • Over 160,000 pieces
of student written work
• Annotated by
experienced teachers
• Ideas and feedback to 