• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
Page
  1. 1
    1
  2. 2
    2
  3. 3
    3
  4. 4
    4
  5. 5
    5
  6. 6
    6
  7. 7
    7
  8. 8
    8
  9. 9
    9
  10. 10
    10
  11. 11
    11
  12. 12
    12
  13. 13
    13
  14. 14
    14
  15. 15
    15
  16. 16
    16
  17. 17
    17
  18. 18
    18

Maths Coursework on Integration

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Maths Coursework

Falk Konstantin Luebbe

Shady Areas

SL Type 1

Introduction:

In this coursework we are trying to find a way to approximate the area under a curve using trapeziums. In order to do this we are searching for a formula to express the approximation of the area using n numbers of trapeziums

Consider the functionimage00.png. (Graph below)

image01.png

The diagram above shows the graph of g. In order to find an approximate area under the curve between the x values 0 and 1 we are going to use the trapezium rule. We are going to start with two trapeziums, add them together to find the approximate area under the curve.

To find the area of a trapezium we will use the formulaimage31.png.

In order to find h the length of the area, which is 1, is dived by the number of trapeziums used. Hence,

image40.png

In order to find the heights a and c for the first- and a and c for the second trapezium assuming that c of the first and a of the second are equal, we’ll use the equation of the graph (image00.png).

The three different heights, or y-values, can be expressed by

g(0), g(0.5), g(1)

Now, in order to find the corresponding y-values, we’ll insert the three x-values into the equation.

image59.png

Now we’ve got the corresponding heights and are able to calculate the approximate area under the curve

The formula for the area under the curve in this case would be:

image67.png

...read more.

Middle

image45.pngimage46.png

image47.pngimage48.png

image49.pngimage50.png

image51.pngimage52.png

image53.pngimage54.png

image55.pngimage56.png

image57.pngimage58.png

Now, we put those values into the general formula in order to find the approximate area under the curveimage06.png:

image41.png

Inserting the values gives us the following:

image60.png

To solve the value in the bracket, we’ll use the GDC giving

A=0.25(7.92)

A=1.98 image28.png

We’ll continue with the function image08.png

First we have to calculate the y-values in order to get the heights of the trapeziums by inserting the x-values into the formula.

image61.png

image62.png

image63.png

image64.png

image65.png

image66.png

image68.png

image69.png

image70.png

Now, we put those values into the general formula in order to find the approximate area under the curveimage08.png :

image41.pngimage71.png

Inserting the values gives us the following:

image72.png To solve the value in the bracket, we’ll use the GDC

A=0.25(32.98)

A=8.245 image28.png

We will continue with the function image10.png

First we have to calculate the y-values in order to get the heights of the trapeziums by inserting the x-values into the formula.

image73.png

image75.png

image76.png

image77.png

image78.png

image79.png

image80.png

image81.png

image82.png

Now, we put those values into the general formula in order to find the approximate area under the curve image10.png :

image41.pngimage71.png

Inserting the values gives us the following:

image84.png

To solve the value in the bracket, we’ll use the GDC

A= 0.25(18.75)

A= 4.69 image28.png

...read more.

Conclusion

image24.png

If we want to calculate the area under the curve from for example x=-1 to x=1 the result is invalid. This is because the two parts of the curve never touch x=0; they get closer and closer but never touch it. Therefore it’s not possible to calculate the area under the curve of y=x^-1.  

Concluding we can say that the more turning points are included in our calculation of the area under a curve the more trapeziums are needed to give a decent approximation. That means that our general formula can give a very inaccurate, even a completely false result if it’s used in the wrong way and too few trapeziums are used. Therefore, the formula always has to be adapted at the shape of the graph; if the graph is a straight line, it’s sufficient to use only one trapezium. But if the area under the curve includes many stationary values, many trapeziums are necessary to produce an accurate approximation as seen in the last example.

In the end we can state that the accuracy of our general formula depends on the shape of the graph. However even quite complex curves with more than one turning point can be solved accurately using enough trapeziums; the more trapeziums we use the more accurate result we get. But nevertheless, it takes way too much time to calculate 100 or even more trapeziums with our formula. Therefore we can say that our formula is not suitable for the calculation of the area of curves with more than two stationary values.

...read more.

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate Maths section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate Maths essays

  1. THE DICE GAME - calculating probabilities

    A = case where player is winning. P(A) = 15/36 B = case where bank is winning. P(B) = 21/36 P is pay out, the amount of the bank pays if the player win.

  2. Maths IA Type 2 Modelling a Functional Building. The independent variable in ...

    to be the design at a maximum height where the roof is 112.5m tall. This due to the fact that provides a larger volume and it provides a larger area floor area. Increasing the efficiency: To improve the efficiency, instead of having a single cuboid under the curve, we will

  1. IB Coursework Maths SL BMI

    20.85 = 119a + c - 15.7 = -21a + c = 5.15 = 140a In order to find a: a= = 0.0368 (to 3 s.f.) If we substitute this equation into the first equation: b = -10a = -10(0.0368)

  2. Area Under a Curve

    3.335 A = 0 B = 1 N = T = 2 20 Y = x2 + 3 Y A B SDFSDF N 3.33375 A = 0 B = 1 N = 2 T = 2 * First I calculated the area manually by hand.

  1. Investigating ratio of areas and volumes

    between the points x = 0 and x = b subtracted by volume B and the volume contained around the x-axis by the graph of y = an between the points x = 0 ans x = a. This last volume will be considered as volume C.

  2. Shady Areas. In this investigation you will attempt to find a rule to approximate ...

    + AC + AD + AE Where: TA is the total area (or sum) of the five trapeziums, which is equivalent to the approximated area underneath the curve, in units squared. AA is the approximated area for trapezium A, in units squared AB is the approximated area for trapezium B,

  1. Area under curve

    A1 + A2 + A3 + A4 + A5 + A6 + A7 + A8 +A9 + A10 + A11 + A12 + A13 + A14 + A15 + A16 + A17 + A18 + A19 + A20 = (1/2 (3+3.002)

  2. Mathematic SL IA -Gold medal height (scored 16 out of 20)

    Through the processes, I excluded 4 functions; sine, cosine, linear and quadratic functions. Since the data given has irregular patterns, I think that I can find best-fit model in polynomial functions. Thus, I am going to investigate the task from the cubic function.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work