• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Maths IA. In this task I am asked to investigate the positions of points in intersecting circles.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

CIRCLES

In this task I am asked to investigate the positions of points in intersecting circles.

image58.png

Circle C1 has the midpoint of “O”, its radius crosses the midpoint of circle C3 which is “A”. Circle C2 crosses both points O and A which means they are both equal as they are the radiuses of circle C2, with the midpoint being “P”. All three circles are located on a diagonal line which holds the points of O, P’ and P, and is represented by the x-axis on the diagram above.

image59.png

The distance from O to A depends on the radius of either C1 or C3, (it doesn’t matter which one because they are both of equal size). The distance from O to P is the same as the distance from A to P. The three points (A, O and P) form an isosceles triangle meaning that angles O and A will have the same angle size, as well as O to P and A to P having the same side length.

image68.png

Because of the three points I am able to make a triangle (mentioned above), yet I have another point which is P’. Drawing a line from A to P’ I am able to divide the triangle into two forming another (smaller) isosceles triangle. Now the angles of sides O and P’ will be equal, as well as the side lengths of O to A and P’ to A.

Provided that r=1, I need to find the values of O to P’ when OP=2, OP=3 and OP=4.

...read more.

Middle

image19.png

image20.png

         A = 180 – 82.8 – 82.

image21.png

         A = 14.4image04.png

image22.png

     O = 82.8image04.png


image23.png

image62.png


image24.png

image63.pngimage64.png

image25.png

O to P’ = 0 .25

General statement

Using the three different values for O to P (OP=2, OP=3, and OP=4) I was able to come up with a general statement as I saw a pattern developing in my results for the distance from O to P’. Each time that the length of O to P increased the fraction decreased:

When, O to P = 2 image26.png

   cosO = image27.png

When, O to P = 3     image12.png

   cosO = image28.png

Each time that the value of O to P is increased the fraction decreases because the denominator increases each time while the numerator stays the same.

The lower the fraction that I image29.png

 , the larger the angle becomes:

O = image05.png

  O = 75.5image04.png

image15.png

   O = 80.4image04.png

And so on…

This pattern continues as I keep increasing the distance from O to P.

As the side length O to P increases the side length of O to P’ decreases:

OP = 2 is 0.501 for OP’

OP = 3 is 0.334 for OP’

OP = 4 is 0.25 for OP’

From finding out more and more results I started to see a pattern, the numerator of the fraction stays the same. The numerator of the fractions above is 1, the radius is also 1.

image27.png

 , image28.png

, image30.png

, image31.png

,image32.png

Then I looked at the values of O to P that were increasing.

I took the radius and divided it by the length of OP:

image33.png

Now to test this on a real example I will use OP = 2, OP = 3, and OP = 4.

image34.png

 =0.5          image35.png

=0.333     image27.png

=0.25

This method gives an accurate enough measurement of the length of the side O to P’.

OP=2

OP=3

OP=4

OP’

0.501

0.334

0.25

...read more.

Conclusion

image43.png

 as image54.png

 will still be 1.

Testing the validity of the general statement

Find O to P’ when r=1, OP=6 and OP=7        Find O to P’ when OP=2 and r=6

OP’ = image55.png

 = 0.167 therefore O to P’ is 0.167.        OP’ = image56.png

 = 18 therefore O to P’ is 18.

OP’ = image57.png

 = 0.143 therefore O to P’ is 0.143.

The limitations of the general statement

When using cosine and sine to figure out the angles and side lengths the calculator gives of more numbers. I put those numbers to three significant figures cutting of the rest. Yet when I use the general statement formula the numbers I am given are more basic which could result in a small, (not very significant) calculation error. Apart from that I found my general statement to work well in solving these problems.

Explaining how I arrived at the general statement

From looking at my results for the first problem I created a general statement formula. I noticed that the radius stayed the same so I placed it on top of my equation and divided it by the distance from O to P giving my length of O to P’

Although when I reached the second problem the general statement did not work therefore it meant that I would have to modify it somehow to make it work. I squared the radius and divided it by the length O to P.

When I looked back on the first problem the modified general statement formula worked, as squaring 1 (image54.png

) will still give me 1 therefore not changing the values I received through the use of technology through sine and cosine.

...read more.

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate Maths section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate Maths essays

  1. Math Studies I.A

    Palau 8,100 70.71 572751 65610000 4999.9041 Papua New Guinea 2,200 65.66 144452 4840000 4311.2356 Peru 8,400 70.14 589176 70560000 4919.6196 Poland 17,300 75.6 1307880 299290000 5715.36 Puerto Rico 17,800 78.54 1398012 316840000 6168.5316 Romania 12,200 71.91 877302 148840000 5171.0481 Rwanda 900 46.2 41580 810000 2134.44 Saint Kitts and Nevis 19,700

  2. Math IA - Logan's Logo

    In fact, we already determined this when we found variable a. (Recall that we divided the total height of the curve by 2 to find the amplitude). The total height of the sine curve is 6.3 units, and divide this by 2 to get 3.15 (variable a).

  1. Math Studies - IA

    The margin of a team's win is suitable. This will be measured in how many times greater a victory is. So to compare a European Ryder Cup win of 181/2 - 91/2 (number of points) with a US major win the same year of 72.5 - 73 (mean number of strokes.

  2. Math IA type 2. In this task I will be investigating Probabilities and investigating ...

    The formula for the expected value is: Expectation = Where n is the number of trials, therefore in this case it is the number of points played which will be 10]. p represents the probability of the event occurring and will be since we want to find the expected value for how many points Adam wins.

  1. Math IA - Matrix Binomials

    In order to find the final expression for Bn, we must multiply the general scalar value by B=bY: , which can also be expressed as . To find an expression for (A+B)n, we must first determine the patterns by calculating the values of (A+B), (A+B)2, (A+B)3, (A+B)4.

  2. Math SL Circle Portfolio. The aim of this task is to investigate positions ...

    By using the distance formula, , we can use a algebraic approach to system of equations to solve for the unknown coordinates. Through this, we can find out the coordinates of A. = 1, A(a, b), O(0, 0) Distance formula: 1= 1= 1= + = 2, A(a, b), P(2, 0)

  1. Gold Medal heights IB IA- score 15

    Through mathematical calculation, the parameters of the sinusoidal function had been calculated to represent the first set of data. This causes the model to solely represent the primary data and the model will not effectively accommodate with any additional data.

  2. Mathematic SL IA -Circles (scored 17 out of 20)

    the length of OP is stable and the length of r is changeable, the length of OP? gets longer, which means the length of OP? changes only by the changes in the length of r.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work