• Join over 1.2 million students every month
• Accelerate your learning by 29%
• Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Maths Internal Assessment: Shady Areas Introduction: In this investigation you will attempt to find a rule to approximate the area under a curve (i.e. between the curve and the x - axis) using trapeziums (trapezoids). Let us consider using the function: . Before finding the area under the curve using trapeziums. I will use integration to help me find the exact area. This will enable me to compare the results I acquire using the trapezium method and to find out whether the use of more trapeziums will provide me with a more accurate estimation of the area under the graph. Using the integration method, I have found the exact area for the function is I will now use the trapezium method to find the approximation of the area under the curve. I have used Autograph to show the graph for the function of g. It can clearly be seen from the graph that the area under the curve is roughly by the sum of the areas of two trapeziums. ...read more.

Middle

of the second trapezium, I will replace 'a' and 'b' with the '' and '' values that I had calculated earlier but I will show my working: A= A= A2= 1.8125 As you know that A1 + A2 is equal to the area under the curve. So the area under the curve is equal to 1.5625 + 1.8125 = 3.375 The difference between the exact value previously done using the integration method and the estimated area under the curve using the trapeziums = . This shows us that the estimates using trapeziums is an over-estimate of the actual area (the estimated area under the curve of the two trapeziums is greater than the actual area under the curve). I am now going to increase the number of trapeziums to five and find second set of estimates for the area under the curve. This will tell me whether increasing the number of trapeziums will make the estimates more accurate. ...read more.

Conclusion

Area 0.652 Area for Fourth Trapezium 3.36 3.64 0.2 Area 0.7 Area for Fifth Trapezium 3.64 4 0.2 Area 0.764 Total Area 3.34 If the areas of the five trapeziums are added together, they give me the estimated area under the curve which is 3.34 0.604 + 0.62 + 0.652 + 0.7 + 0.764 = 3.34 The area given using the five trapeziums is still larger than the actual area found using the integration method ). Therefore it is an over - estimate of the actual area. However, the area obtained using five trapeziums are closer to the actual area than the area obtained using two trapeziums. The difference is not much. It can be said that using more trapeziums provides us with a lesser under/over estimate of the estimated area under the curve. To test this hypothesis, I will use 25,50,75 and 100 trapeziums to reach an estimate of the area under the curve. Using Autograph and Microsoft Excel 2007, I have created the following tables and graphs: ?? ?? ?? ?? Ritvik Menon H3CS ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate Maths section.

## Found what you're looking for?

• Start learning 29% faster today
• 150,000+ documents available
• Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
• Join over 1.2 million students every month
• Accelerate your learning by 29%
• Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

# Related International Baccalaureate Maths essays

1. ## Shady Areas. In this investigation you will attempt to find a rule to approximate ...

For each diagram, find the approximation for the area. What do you notice? Various diagrams will be created to depict the increasing number of trapeziums, which result in a greater precision for the approximation for the area. Number of Trapeziums Manual Calculations Riemann Sum Application Graphs (Y = x2 + 3)

2. ## Area under curve

from b=3? to a=0 using n=2. Clearly the shaded area does not equal the actual area. For instance the shaded is negative, but the actual area is positive. This occurred because the middle point of the graph is negative. The above shaded area is for sin (x)

1. ## Mathematics Higher Level Internal Assessment Investigating the Sin Curve

This is known as a period in mathematics. It is the interval between likewise values, or in simpler terms the interval before the graph 'repeats' itself. The graph below shows the curve stretching inwards or outwards (depending on whether the value is greater than or smaller than 1)

2. ## Investigating the Ratios of Areas and Volumes around a Curve

are shown in bold. n a b Ratio 2 0 1 2.00000000001 2 0 2 2 2 -2 -1 2 2 1 2 2 2 1 3 2 2 5 6 2 2 0.5 5.5 2 2 100 150 2 2 -1 1 0 2 -1

1. ## Investigating ratio of areas and volumes

Testing the conjecture: The conjecture will be tested against the three real numbers ?, e, and 100. n Area A Area B Area A / Area B ? 0.758 0.242 3.14 e 0.731 0.269 2.72 100 0.989 0.010 100 For y = x?: area A: area B = 3.12: 1

2. ## The aim of this particular portfolio investigation is to find the area under a ...

The graph below shows the same curve with interval of x=0 and x=1 divided into 5 trapeziums. Height of each trapezium will be, h= = 0.2 . the area under the curve can be approximated as follws with the use of 5 trapeziums. Area =(g(0) + g(0.2) 0.2)+(g(0.2) + g(0.4)

1. ## The investigation given asks for the attempt in finding a rule which allows us ...

General Expression from 0?x?1, g(x) =x^2+3 Let n = number of trapezoids, and A = the approximation of area under the curve. Based on the question, the general expression is to be found for the area under the curve of g, from x=0 to x=1.

2. ## Investigating Slopes Assessment

So if before, f1(x)=3X2. This time f1(x) is f1(x)=6X2. 1. For this type of case, now, I will let my ?a? number equal to 3. My hypothesis is that, at the end the f1(x) function, will be three times the gradient I found out for f(x)=X3. • Over 160,000 pieces
of student written work
• Annotated by
experienced teachers
• Ideas and feedback to 