- Level: International Baccalaureate
- Subject: Maths
- Word count: 2404
Shady Areas. In this investigation you will attempt to find a rule to approximate the area under a curve (i.e. between the curve and the x-axis) using trapeziums (trapezoids). Consider the function g(x) = x2 + 3
Extracts from this document...
Introduction
In this investigation you will attempt to find a rule to approximate the area under a curve (i.e. between the curve and the x-axis) using trapeziums (trapezoids).
Consider the function g(x) = x2 + 3
The diagram below shows the graph of g. The area under this curve from x = 0 to x = 1 is approximated by the sum of the area of two trapeziums. Find this approximation.
In this investigation I will attempt to find the approximate area under a curve (i.e. between the curve and the x-axis) using trapeziums (trapezoids).
The area of a trapezoid can be expressed as:
A= (1/2)(b)(h1+h2)
Where:
b is the length of the base of the trapezium along the x-axis
h1 is the vertical length (height) of one side on the trapzium, the equivalent y- value for one of the endpoints on the base
h2 is the other height of the trapezium for which it is the corresponding y-value for the second endpoint of the base.
A is the area of a specific trapezium in units squared.
The total area underneath the curve can be expressed as:
TA= AA + AB
Where:
TA is the total area (or sum) of the two trapeziums, which is equivalent to the approximated area underneath the curve, in units squared.
AA is the estimated, calculated area of the trapezium labeled as A, in units squared.
AB
Middle
3.336
20
3.33
3.33375
First I calculated the area manually by hand. Then I tested these results with the use of technology, which in this case was the Riemann Sum Application on a TI-84+, which I used to create the table above.
The smaller the trapeziums, the more precise the area is because a smaller unit of measurement was utilized. It is possible to go on to infinity trapeziums, in which case the uncertainty would decrease more and more resulting in the relative error heading towards zero. This is because with more trapeziums it is possible to get a better approximation of the area since the line is going to a microscopic level, nearer to the original line. It gets nearer to the real value.
Use the diagram below to find a general expression for the area under the curve of g, from x = 0 to x = 1, using n trapeziums.
Based on the pattern observed from the diagrams above, a general equation can be written for the area under the curve of g, from x=0 to x=1, using n trapeziums. [g(x) = x2 + 3]
∫ca f(x) dx → ∫10 x2 + 3 dx
Where:
c is equal to the end x value of the domain
a is equal to the beginning x value for the domain
Y= f(x), the equation of the curve
dx indicates that everything is being taken in respects to x
The above equation in its expanded form is:
∫10 x2 + 3 dx =(1/2)
Conclusion
∫f(x)dx = 0.463647609
- y = √(2x+1)
∫ca f(x) dx = [(xn – x0)/(2n)] (g(x0) + g(xn) + 2[∑ g(xi)])
x0: g(x) = √(2x+1)
g(0) = √(2(0)+1)
= 1
xn: g(x) = √(2x+1)
g(1) = √(2(1)+1)
= 1.732050808
∫10 (√(2x+1)) dx = (1/8) (1 + 1.73 + 2[1.224744871 + 1.414213562 + 1.58113883]
= 1.396530667
Calculator:
math-> 9. fnInt ( enter 2/(x2 + 4) ,X ,1 ,3 ) ENTER OR Y= enter y = 2/(x2 + 4) 2nd TRACE 7 ENTER graph displayed 0 ENTER 1 S ENTER S
∫f(x)dx = 1.398717474
CONCLUSION
The manual calculations derived from the general statement appeared to be very close to the exact answers as computed by the calculator. Based on the results, it appears that no matter the shape, using the trapezium rule provides with a fairly accurate and precise approximation.
However, it can be determined in two ways whether the approximation is an overestimate or an underestimate. The first is to sketch a graph and draw the trapeziums. If the tops of the trapeziums are above the curve, there is an overestimate, and if the trapeziums are below the curve, it is an underestimate. The second method is to examine the second derivative of the graph. If it is negative, indicating concave down, then the curve will have a lesser gradient at any given interval in the positive x-direction, and therefore the trapeziums will be underneath the curve. If the second derivative is positive, indicating upwards concavity, trapeziums will extrude, and thus give an overestimate.
Overall, to achieve the most precise and accurate approximation for an area under the curve, n, the number of trapeziums, needs to be divided into smaller subintervals.
- -
This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate Maths section.
Found what you're looking for?
- Start learning 29% faster today
- 150,000+ documents available
- Just £6.99 a month