• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. 9
  10. 10
  11. 11
  12. 12
  13. 13
  14. 14

Shady Areas. In this investigation you will attempt to find a rule to approximate the area under a curve (i.e. between the curve and the x-axis) using trapeziums (trapezoids). Consider the function g(x) = x2 + 3

Extracts from this document...


In this investigation you will attempt to find a rule to approximate the area under a curve (i.e. between the curve and the x-axis) using trapeziums (trapezoids).

Consider the function g(x) = x2 + 3

The diagram below shows the graph of g.  The area under this curve from x = 0 to x = 1 is approximated by the sum of the area of two trapeziums.  Find this approximation.

In this investigation I will attempt to find the approximate area under a curve (i.e. between the curve and the x-axis) using trapeziums (trapezoids).

The area of a trapezoid can be expressed as:

A= (1/2)(b)(h1+h2)


                b is the length of the base of the trapezium along the x-axis

        h1 is the vertical length (height) of one side on the trapzium, the equivalent y- value for one of the endpoints on the base

h2 is the other height of the trapezium for which it is the corresponding y-value for the second endpoint of the base.

A is the area of a specific trapezium in units squared.

The total area underneath the curve can be expressed as:



TA is the total area (or sum) of the two trapeziums, which is equivalent to the approximated area underneath the curve, in units squared.

AA is the estimated, calculated area of the trapezium labeled as A, in units squared.


...read more.







First I calculated the area manually by hand.  Then I tested these results with the use of technology, which in this case was the Riemann Sum Application on a TI-84+, which I used to create the table above.

The smaller the trapeziums, the more precise the area is because a smaller unit of measurement was utilized. It is possible to go on to infinity trapeziums, in which case the uncertainty would decrease more and more resulting in the relative error heading towards zero. This is because with more trapeziums it is possible to get a better approximation of the area since the line is going to a microscopic level, nearer to the original line. It gets nearer to the real value.

Use the diagram below to find a general expression for the area under the curve of g, from x = 0 to x = 1, using n trapeziums.         

Based on the pattern observed from the diagrams above, a general equation can be written for the area under the curve of g, from x=0 to x=1, using n trapeziums.  [g(x) = x2 + 3]

ca   f(x) dx  10   x2 + 3 dx


        c is equal to the end x value of the domain

        a is equal to the beginning x value for the domain

        Y= f(x), the equation of the curve

        dx indicates that everything is being taken in respects to x

The above equation in its expanded form is:  

10 x2 + 3 dx =(1/2)

...read more.


2 + 4) 2nd      TRACE      7     ENTER   graph displayed   0     ENTER   1 S  ENTER S

f(x)dx = 0.463647609

  1. y = (2x+1)

ca f(x) dx = [(xn – x0)/(2n)] (g(x0) + g(xn) + 2[∑ g(xi)])

x0: g(x) = (2x+1)

g(0) = (2(0)+1)

               = 1

xn: g(x) = (2x+1)

g(1) = (2(1)+1)

               = 1.732050808

10 ((2x+1)) dx = (1/8) (1 + 1.73 + 2[1.224744871 + 1.414213562 + 1.58113883]

= 1.396530667


math-> 9. fnInt (  enter   2/(x2 + 4)      ,X     ,1      ,3    )   ENTER  OR Y=  enter y = 2/(x2 + 4) 2nd      TRACE      7     ENTER   graph displayed   0     ENTER   1 S  ENTER S

f(x)dx = 1.398717474


The manual calculations derived from the general statement appeared to be very close to the exact answers as computed by the calculator. Based on the results, it appears that no matter the shape, using the trapezium rule provides with a fairly accurate and precise approximation.

However, it can be determined in two ways whether the approximation is an overestimate or an underestimate. The first is to sketch a graph and draw the trapeziums. If the tops of the trapeziums are above the curve, there is an overestimate, and if the trapeziums are below the curve, it is an underestimate. The second method is to examine the second derivative of the graph. If it is negative, indicating concave down, then the curve will have a lesser gradient at any given interval in the positive x-direction, and therefore the trapeziums will be underneath the curve. If the second derivative is positive, indicating upwards concavity, trapeziums will extrude, and thus give an overestimate.

Overall, to achieve the most precise and accurate approximation for an area under the curve, n, the number of trapeziums, needs to be divided into smaller subintervals.

-  -

...read more.

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate Maths section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate Maths essays

  1. Extended Essay- Math

    �"a�_][,�a�B�@0G�-0`���/(c)��qÉA��H�� X�MÕ¢8c'� �"k�Lm3@@w M��>K�JM��v("q���+D�v��FzH-lkTBC��`�����I"&_�1/2'G@\2b"A| =z�j�g�!0r�HL"��(r)E1/2� Ò¸"�K�3UQ Y��-5(c)ñ­¦1/4�Z�s�,Z����Z�U��H-� 'cÆ�� P|�1/4�k~�����e.z�Er�9ß�۷�b�-R\�2�'M�]"�Êu7n��P�R���� �$Lm��=����`a�'���#�\i! I�� L=�q��%6�o"1/4"S'c�:w�L�N�-g�z�%+P�""ݺuS�dh'1/4Õ¥K|er�4�1_q��%���{�...QR411/4��� 2��"Bg$É"'�������"S�Ke�99*6,'(c)�\�ܬ�y��;v�PnXB�,Y ,(tm)6D�E-�'���'#F���ذH"Ó�]`'4>��3e��Z���%� �U"V!Ψ��'�"�}���/GI��E�,����U�X\w�%��$�o���d����XW(c) �������2 3� E� 7��'I��شiS�M��'�E'L���;O���HFW��P-Y�$��m-$NB�ʥH3W<�rs'G6yo��-~�V�Zq�&���V�!@"/Pd�D� ��gÍ�";�M��jP"&Mv��M=:��n�r$K�� 8m.��r�H6%s Tr�ܹs-(tm)OVÓ�I��<P�E27Dot 'p�����J-��3/4��_|Q�����MQ�<G'�HQ�`iH�1/4Ùµk�3/4}��CAof"Y�sR^�� �EZ��a���gΜiÕ¬Ò ï¿½o���aX$�:�"�x�4�-���%��"mR(r)"�PÝ��J* ��+�k�(���#���E"x8 �*$�ki�G�(r)>}��#��*.fÏ1/2aÆÅ�ա�`���;,21/47�1/4e�-���S[�$�",��c�`1t���'U�� @� D$��c�ÍN���$�'<�d]4���--[�X�["�;-�8q"Gl��k�(r)...4Ó§O�p�j�$c��H"'"#X�Q��� C �1/2Û¶m#�/Lc��K�w�}� -�e�G-B&����(c) �g�6R$�Vj'" 3<�3d���� ��Ñ~T����ߧg� �ڴi��O"]�"�H��~ߧ�5 �^�"�L�,'_"�cE�"@� �S�(r)�C6���""=�� &|��G�{��7���[d+4n���x�j-���W-�yJ��N�*� �^SzW/u?��a��E'�2��Xh���)�x��{.��@ $Ϫ�|�:)ز5jT�����ذHTkV�(r)�_�'u-��IS...J��Ok t<n�A�...���v!�CL&��NI��[���iÒ¡8��N; #,�_ï¿½ï¿½× R^��@1/2���o% ]t�E�sL��1/2{���#��g\�� 8H�1/4��׿���^{�1/2Ħ �(s�%gÌ=�P*�(c)�"@ �~'�8v�X �yJ�E�h��3&9�I,�51/2�a�+�1/4Ò~�Yg��O*�'/1/4���ÍKfH�r.I��O��O<��q��={�p�QbÍ5"v����\�B��H�y�GL1O>�d��za%��>��c�R�?!h�Jq)��y�'d��...uv'��K-.%Zn�O'O`�Ð~�)~�'���:��ñ\�wQ�])i��$C�Ü"'qWҦ�y"%IzÓ±6U?�?�jpI�,�O3��L�O\R�7�Æ�� �vxQ�8#*��8ɣ�t���v��'G�%R' �2�i��{�z表�%o{��W�����w%m*�Y'wz|a���5z1/44s$N��WVX!�!E���;x.���gr1/2=��m &���-�J�X8��*tE�����Í�'Üh!8):��E� �.r��6m�1/2J�V�fZ�Üjf�L�&�-'�/�5�(tm)A�jf���Ok5�7�Q `"8R~� �a��}-w�u��tK�Þ�~�"��r 3/4u��0��+���"���d��agJ"���"##d�ذ"<�,�/viV�PF�;�ÒÅ(tm)Ûo3/4y�QG������G�:Û°y ;�04��K-D�į-rs�� �⤣�v-(�"dF��"vgeX$��a' DY��,'�9�Þ1/4��6!s'*'S7-A�%�n�N�z�D��-�i��Ia;w�"R~L#G�$5�Cd'�`�`�rK�7nQ/�"" �FU"F�*Û³"1/4�%$[�h!��=;��(tm)

  2. Mathematics Higher Level Internal Assessment Investigating the Sin Curve

    what the graphs would look like, and how they would have been translated from the original curve. This can be done by just identifying the different variables and . We will predict the graphs of , and and then we will test our predictions by graphing these equations.

  1. Parabola investigation. In this task, we will investigate the patterns in the intersections of ...

    Investigating the conjecture when the intersecting lines are changed. We will still use the same parabola but the intersecting lines will be varied The general equation of intersecting lines is As there are two intersecting lines, they should be written as the following equations: Consider parabola and the lines and.

  2. Logarithm Bases - 3 sequences and their expression in the mth term has been ...

    0.67 0.33 0.84 Full view of graph Thus, as seen in the graphing program, a new graph has been created on the bases of the common difference found between the distances between the points of the previous graphs. The new graph has the equation of y= in the form PART 2.

  1. Analysis of Functions. The factors of decreasing and decreasing intervals (in the y ...

    In power functions when the degree are positive integers then the function is subjective because as we can see in the graph there is a many to one relation. But in the case when the degrees of the function are negative integers, the functions turn to be bijective because there

  2. Investigating the Ratios of Areas and Volumes around a Curve

    seems to hold for the new limits. Any proof of the correlation must therefore explain the instances where it seems not to hold. To test further instances I produced a program on my Casio fx-9750G+ graphing calculator. The following program performs the above process automatically: ?�N ?�A ?�B ?(Y^(1/N),A^N,B^N)/?(X^N,A,B)

  1. In this investigation, I will be modeling the revenue (income) that a firm can ...

    1. 2. = -0.75 3. Gradient: -0.75 Using my GDC, I wanted to check my answers so I inserted the equation, substituting the x and y values with the price and quantity demanded resulting in the same answer. Now as we have our gradient for quarter 1, we have the first part

  2. The purpose of this investigation is to create and model a dice-based casino game ...

    between one and p; therefore there are different ways to do this for each p out of total possible outcomes; therefore the probability that p is the highest number that player A rolls is . Similarly, in the probability that an integer q between one and six is recognized as

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work