• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Acceleration Lab. We believe that by using a ramp and a marble that we will be able to prove that acceleration due to gravity is 9.81 m/s.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

                Barbara Jordan        

                October 24, 2012

                Acceleration Lab

Design

Aspect 1

The aim of this experiment is to prove that acceleration due to gravity is 9.81 m/s.

Hypothesis

We believe that by using a ramp and a marble that we will be able to prove that acceleration due to gravity is 9.81 m/s.

-Explanation

We think this will happen because gravity pulls the marble down to the bottom of the ramp, and if acceleration due to gravity is 9.81 m/s then the data from the trials will show that it is true.

-Predictive Graph

If I were to make a graph for this experiment it would be a velocity and time graph with a straight line that goes in a positive direction; as the time increases the velocity does too.

Variables

Independent Variable: Starting point for marble

...read more.

Middle

1.4

Time(s) ±.01

1.32

1.56

1.56

1.48

Position 2

Trial 1

Trial 2

Trial 3

Average

Length (m) ±.0005

1.1

1.1

1.1

Time (s) ±.01

1.24

1.25

1.21

1.23

Position 3

Trial 1

Trial 2

Trial 3

Average

Length (m) ±.0005

.8

.8

.8

Time (s) ±.01

1.08

1.1

1.19

1.12

Aspect 2

image00.jpg

 The relationship between the time and distance seem to be non-linear; there is some type of relationship between these two.

Aspect 3

Analysis of the data

Distance the marble rolls = d

...read more.

Conclusion

Aspect 2

The ramp was an overall good apparatus to use for this experiment, although some things were not taken into account that should have been.

  1. Our measurements for the meter stick are not very accurate because we used two different meter sticks. ( we started and stopped)
  2. We had trouble timing when the marble stopped correctly, we originally had 5 trials but only selected three this is random era and cause uncertainties in our data.

Aspect 3

The investigation could have given more accurate results if the following modifications were made in the future:

  1. We could have measured the angle where the two parts of the ramp meet to be more accurate the second time we started the experiment.
  2. Timing issues related to human reaction could have been avoided if we used a type of computer software to track the acceleration of each position.
...read more.

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate Physics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate Physics essays

  1. Angle Acceleration

    take out the mg = mg (sin ? - u cosine ?) and that is all equal to ma = mg (sin ? - u cosine ?) divide both sides by m a = g (sin ? - u cosine ?) In our experiment, the angle (?) will range from 0-90 degrees, and by looking at the formula above I have predicted that as the ?

  2. Aim: ...

    mm/sec� 45� Acceleration Trial 1 1875 (+/- 100) mm/s� Trial 2 1953 (+/- 100) mm/sec� Average: 1914 (+/- 100) mm/sec� It appears as if the larger the angle, the larger the acceleration of the cart. Conclusion As I had predicted in my hypothesis, the angle of the slope is directly related to the acceleration of the trolley on the slope.

  1. This lab will test the effects of the surface area factor on acceleration due ...

    same manner every trial so that no extra force is given to the paper before its point of release which may alter its initial velocity. The environmental conditions of the experiment will be controlled by performing all trials in the same hallway with no excess air flow to possibly alter or effect the time of descent of the paper.

  2. Pendulum work out the value of acceleration due to gravity (g), by using ...

    > Diagram- (A diagram showing the entire setup of the apparatus.) (A diagram showing the oscillation of a simple pendulum.) > Apparatus- To conduct this practical work the following apparatus was used: * A strong table clamp- This piece of apparatus was used for the purpose of providing a base for the pendulum to suspend it from.

  1. Investigate the Size of Craters in Sand Due to Dropped Object.

    We also predicted that the volume of craters will also increase as the depth of craters increase. Apart from that, because we used slotted mass as our dropped object, it indicates that we will have constant diameter of the craters.

  2. Motion due to a Steady Force - Lab

    Fig 3: Applied pulling force vs. measured and ideal acceleration. Conclusion In Fig 2 graph (measured pull force vs. acceleration) the line is a curve because the mass was changing during the experiment. The slope of the line at any given point represents the total mass at that acceleration.

  1. Investigation into the relationship between acceleration and the angle of free fall downhill

    The distance travelled by the object was controlled at all times by putting a mark on the starting point, this way the object would never start over the starting point and would always cover the same distance. The initial velocity of the object was always kept at 0; a partner would make sure the object wasn?t moving before being released.

  2. AIM: To determine the acceleration due to gravity on Earth using the drop ball ...

    2. Reaction time ? One member of the group was responsible for timing all the trials so that delays due to his reaction time negate each other. 3. The measuring tape ? The same measuring tape was used to measure all heights.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work