• Join over 1.2 million students every month
• Accelerate your learning by 29%
• Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Aim: To investigate the relationship between the angle of a slope incline and the acceleration of a model cart moving down it

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

IB Physics Uniform Motion

Aim:

To investigate the relationship between the angle of a slope incline and the acceleration of a model cart moving down it

Hypothesis:

As the angle of the slope incline increases, the acceleration of the model cart moving down it will also increase. I have predicted that acceleration is directly linked with the angle of the slope on which the object is moving.  When coming up with this hypothesis, I asked myself the following question, “what forces actually act on the model cart as it is going down the slope”. There are in fact three forces acting on the cart.  The force of gravity (g), friction (F), and the force of reaction (R) (see diagram 1).  If we were to draw a Y and X axis on the object, the X axis showing the movement along and the Y axis being perpendicular to that then we can find out how the forces act.

On the Y axis, there are two forces, the force of reaction and a fraction of the force of gravity.  Since there is no movement along the Y axis we know that the forces cancel out.  To find out the reaction force, we can use the formula R = mg ∙ cosine α (see diagram).

On the X axis, there is movement, which means that the 2 opposite forces (friction and the other fraction of the gravitational force) do not cancel out.  We know that force is equal to mass times acceleration (F = ma)

Middle

11. Repeat steps 2-10 again so that you have a 2nd trial (this is handy because you can obtain an average result in order to eliminate any errors)

12. Repeat steps 2-11 using more books, this will give the 2nd larger angle

13. Now finally repeat steps 2-11 using even more books, giving the 3rd and final angle.

NOTE: if still unsure of what to do, I strongly recommend viewing Diagram 1 (the set up) below.  It should become very clear.

Equipment: Usable protractor, Ticker-tape timer (with necessary wiring), flat long wooden board, non-motorized wooden and wheeled trolley, a pile of books or something with height and stability to rest the wooden board on Variables:

In this experiment I tried to keep all variables constant, with the exception of the angle of the slope which was changed twice.  The distance the cart descends, the surroundings, the cart used and board were all held constant throughout the trials.

I have decided that in order to prove my hypothesis correct, I would need to use at least 3 different angles and use 2 trials for each angle (to ensure validity).  The 3 angles I chose to investigate were 25°, 35°, and 45°.  In order to record the acceleration for each, I would first need to have a complete record of the motion of the trolley.  The dots that would be presented on the ticker-tape would be sufficient enough for me to then calculate the acceleration of the trolley in each case. The following 3 pages contain results of all three ticker-tapes.

Conclusion

If granted another opportunity to repeat this experiment, I would certainly change some things.  First of all I would chose to perform more then only 2 trials for each angle.  I would opt for about 10 trials, then find the average of the 8 best and use that as the final result.  Also I would like to experiment with more then 3 angles.  As hard as it might be, I would like to try a very steep angle, around 70°. Moreover, it would be interesting to see the effect of mass in terms of acceleration.  Perhaps try carts with different weights.  All in all, the experiment was a success.  The small errors did not alter the answers too greatly.  The accelerations of both trials where close enough to each other.  And my hypothesis stood correct.

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate Physics section.

Found what you're looking for?

• Start learning 29% faster today
• 150,000+ documents available
• Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
• Join over 1.2 million students every month
• Accelerate your learning by 29%
• Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Related International Baccalaureate Physics essays

1. Uniform Motion Lab. This experiment will measure the motion of a cart moving on ...

friction to be added and no difference in the slope of ramp. * Mass of Cart: The mass of the cart was kept constant because the difference in mass could possibly cause a difference in the gravitational force acting on the cart.

2. Centripetal Force

force: Standard deviation: So, the centripetal force of mass 50 g is: Force of gravity with mass 50 g: Table 4.6 Comparison of centripetal force and force of gravity Mass (kg) Centripetal Force Fc (N) Gravitational Force Fg (N) ?F Percentage error 10 0.4127976�0.0359655 0.098 0.314798 76.259552 20 0.4267571�0.0730388 0.196

1. Motion of the trolley on the inclined plane

The unit of the uncertainty of the distance is expressed in centimeters, the uncertainty of time in seconds and the uncertainty of acceleration in centimeters per second square. The air force and friction has a significant influence on the value of acceleration during the experiment.

2. Analyzing Uniform Circular Motion

However, the precision for both graphs is close to perfect, as R2 value almost approaches 1. The theoretical slope will be determined in this section and will later be utilised in the conclusion section to find the percent error. Slope = Slope = (relative)

1. Physics Airtrack Experiment. The effects of angle on the acceleration of a glider on ...

Overall the values recieved from the experiment did not at all support the theoretical or literature values because with the a=gsin? equation gave realistic values whereas the processed data showed that the accleration for an incline of 11 degrees was far above average.

2. In this extended essay, I will be investigating projectile motion via studying the movement ...

The experimental values of range obtained are less than the corresponding theoretical values of range. This is mainly due to the air resistance. Thirdly, the trajectory of the projected metal ball clearly resembled a parabolic path, which matched with the description and characteristic of a typical projectile motion.

1. Investigation into the relationship between acceleration and the angle of free fall downhill

These heights were used instead integers because it was the height of the brick and books used. 5. For all the different heights (Step 4) there were 5 trials, all results were recorded to be further processed. Measuring the dependant and independent variables: The acceleration of the cart when it goes downhill (dependant variable)

2. HL Physics Revision Notes

The resultant displacement is the difference of both displacements. Read more on p42-44 Topic 5: Electric Currents: The potential difference is defined as the work done per unit charge to move a positive test charge between A and B. Potential Difference = Energy Difference/ Charge The base unit for potential difference is the Joule per Coulomb (JC-1). • Over 160,000 pieces
of student written work
• Annotated by
experienced teachers
• Ideas and feedback to
improve your own work 