• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Investigate the factors affecting the period of a double string pendulum

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

12/2/2009 12:31 PM

Investigation Question: Investigate the factors affecting the period of a double string pendulum

Before commencing my Internal investigation, I decided to research the area of subject of the question over the Internet. Thus I was able to find the definition of a double string pendulum. This will help me in creating my design for a successful experiment.

Double string pendulum: metal suspended on each side by two pieces of strings of equal length that are then held by two stand clamps. It functions exactly like normal pendulum with one wave being equal to swing of the metal back and forth from its original position. Period and frequency have the same units, definitions and equations. Except you need only to bring back one side of the metal at certain angle or distance to make the bar oscillate.

  • In this internal assessment for IB Physics I looked at the period and the frequency at which a metal bar oscillates on a double string pendulum. To achieve, this analysis I suspended a metal bar of 17 cm by two strings then held in place by two clamps. I knew from previous knowledge that five specific factors affected the frequency and period at which a metal bar oscillates on a double string pendulum and these the distance between the two strings, the mass of the bar, the amplitude of the oscillations (i.e.: the angle/distance at which the bar will be pulled back) , the center of mass of the bar and the length of the bar. For practical reasons I chose to investigate the distance between the two strings (which I called l in my experiment and is measured in cm) because it was simple enough to be measured, required the less preparation and

Thus I hypothesize that the distance, l

...read more.

Middle

±0.2 seconds making a grand total of ±0.21 seconds to each trial.

Having figured out these factors, I was ready to begin collecting results. The first thing I did was to set up my apparatus according to my Diagram 1. I then measured the distance l as 2 cm with 30cm ruler (used for precision and accuracy) to make the centre of the bar meaning 1 cm from each side of the centre of the bar with 7.5cm on each side of the strings.

Then I pulled back the left side of the metal bar with my left hand until it was 90 degrees from its original position completely perpendicular to my body facing my apparatus. Whilst with my right hand I got ready to press the ‘start’ button of the digital timer. I then released the metal bar without exerting any other force and this caused to oscillate back and forth from the 90 degrees position to its original or resting position and back again. Then in my head, I started to count the number of waves (swing of the metal bar back and forth from its original position) and stopped the timer when I had counted 10 waves. I repeated this very step 5 times to minimize human error and get a fair average of the recorded values. After inscribing the values recorded for the five tries, I added them all together and divided the resultant by five to get average.

I then proceeded to repeat the above steps for the different distances of l  (specific measurements in the first paragraph of my method) for 4 cm, 6 cm, 8cm, 10 cm and 12 cm. Each time I proceeded with a

...read more.

Conclusion

±0.2 seconds for my human error and reaction time and speed. However I would need to bring the total number of waves to be counted to 5 and the number of tries to 3 to make it less tedious and long for me and to increase my human reaction time and speed if I was to redo this investigation. However for human error due to my perception and a decreasing period, I would need to employ a second person that will concentrate solely on the timing and digital timer of the period. However co-ordination and good interaction would be needed between the two persons would be needed for this work.

However this factor of error was not the only to be a limitation to my investigation as the digital timer had only two decimal places there was an error of ±0.01 seconds therefore the grand total error of ±0.21 seconds to be taken into account in all my tables and graphs. In addition to this the sue of the 30cm ruler was fairly inaccurate and  I should have taken a 15 cm ruler to do my measurements, thus the measurement of the distance between the two strings might have incorrect to a few mm. This was not due poor equipment or instruments but my lack of judgement on using better material. Another important limitation was my inaccuracy at tying knots to hold the metal bar in the horizontal plane parallel to the clamps, thus perhaps my strings were a few cm off from one another. Tying knots and better judgment regarding equipment are two things I should do before starting a knew investigation further on in this domain.

Taking these errors into account, I may have been able to improve on them in a number of ways in order to further support my conclusion, or even disprove it.


...read more.

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate Physics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate Physics essays

  1. An experiment to find the Resistivity of Pencil leads in different degree of hardness

    The higher the temperature the higher the resistance because the electrons move faster and the positive ions vibrate more due to an increase in kinetic energy. This means that there are more collisions between them leading to an increase in the resistance.

  2. Aim: To investigate the factors that affect the period of oscillation of a simple ...

    1)350 2)300 3)250 4)200 5)150 6)100 20.65 22.12 22.41 22.0 21.88 22.16 0.897 0.897 0.897 0.897 0.897 0.897 Table 3A: The effect of the length of the string in the period of motion Mass of bob constant, amplitude of swing = 6 cm Length of string Time for 20 swings Period of motion (s)

  1. Physics Pendulum Internal assesment

    Using points (0.3, 1.35) and (0.65, 2.85) I will now work out the gradient using the equation below: Using the equation I worked out the gradient to be 4.29 (3s.f) By squaring formula we get and then rearranging the formula to solve for g we get the formula: If we refer to the formula and compare T2

  2. Simple pendulum lab. In this experiment, the length of the string will be ...

    + (Uncertainty 2) X 100 (Value 1) (Value 2) 0.2 + 0.001 X 100 1.52 0.535 = 9.14 ms-2 �13.3 % = 13.3 X 9.14 100 = �1.21562 = 9.14 ms-2 � 1 ms-2 Average of Gravity = 9.14 + 9.17 + 8.64 + 9.22 + 8.99 + 8.42 + 7.70 + 7.34 8 = 8.56 ms-2

  1. Investigating the Breaking Distance of a Cart

    4.1 Support of Hypothesis As the hypothesis was that there is a dependency between the initial velocity and the braking distance a graph of velocity squared is plotted against the braking distance. The graph data is distributed in a fairly linear way.

  2. Light Intensity Investigation

    sideways along the block during each trial to ensure that we get it directly in line with the light bulb so that our highest reading is the highest possible for that distance. * Comparing our results with another group to see if there are any anomalies in our data.

  1. Investigating the Oscillations of an Obstructed Pendulum

    we must know that the time period = Average amount of time taken for 20 oscillation TAVG 20 TAVG has an uncertainty of ±0.05 seconds. Now, when we divide TAVG by 20, the following equation must be used to find the uncertainty: Δ = uncertainty x = TAVG y =

  2. The Half-life of dice Decay investigation

    11% 3 0.84 0.67 8.5% 4 1.0 0.82 10% 5 1.1 0.97 8.6% 6 1.3 1.2 7.2% 7 1.5 1.3 8.4% 8 1.8 1.7 5.9% 9 2.0 1.8 6.7% 10 2.3 2.1 9.1% 11 2.8 2.8 0.0% 12 2.8 2.8 0.0% 13 3.0 3.0 0.0% 14 3.2 3.2 0.0% 15

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work