• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Investigating the Breaking Distance of a Cart

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Investigating the Breaking Distance of a Cart

Physics SL

1. INTRODUCTION

Braking distance is the distance travelled by an object when the brakes are applied. In this experiment we are looking at the stopping distance of a crate which is similar ot the concept of braking distance covered by a moving object.

1.2 Research Question

The purpose of this experiment was to investigate the factors affecting breaking distance of a moving object, which in this case was a metal cart. Within this experiment it was established that there is a relationship between the initial velocity of the cart and its breaking distance.

Why it was decided to take into account the initial velocity was because of the simple dependency, which was evident after calculations. Since during braking of an object the kinetic energy (EK) becomes heat energy. Thus the following equation can be written down

½ mv20= Fd

In order to come to distinct results a linear graph should be obtained. Thus we should have an equation, which is simple and shows a distinct dependency. We can simplify the equation to show that distance is directly proportional to the square of the speed.

dv20

1.3 Hypothesis

...read more.

Middle

5

100.37

47.9

6

109.23

36.9

7

110.97

36.9

8

142.55

29.50

9

150.4

28.1

10

176.12

24.70

Table 1.1 demonstrates the very first data received from the light gates and the measuring ruler. The data has not yet been converted to necessary units.

Table 1.2

Trial

Time(s) ±0,0005 s

Stopping distance (m) ±0,05 m

1

0.0699

0.6200

2

0.0760

0.6300

3

0.0872

0.5100

4

0.0964

0.6600

5

0.1003

0.4800

6

0.1092

0.3700

7

0.1121

0.3700

8

0.1426

0.3000

9

0.1504

0.2800

10

0.1761

0.2500

Table 1.2 on the other hand shows the previous data from table 1.1 only in the correct units for further calculations for processed data. The error chosen for the time was a systematic error of ±0,0005 s. The error for the measuring ruler was a reading error of  ±0,05 m.

3.2 Processed Data

The width of the cardboard flag was 5.2 cm. In the calculations this must however be converted to 0.052 m for the right calculations to be made.

...read more.

Conclusion

5.2 Further Developments

The initial problem of launching the crate should have been solved with special apparatus. Some sort of spring that could launch the crate into motion. A spring which when compressed and then released would launch the crate into motion. Thus it would have been possible to systematically compress and release in ranging lengths.  To remove the additional braking of the motion on the crate a singular 1 meter long track should have been in use. For more realistc results the wheels could have included tyres. Thus the information gathered could be applied to vehicles. The frictional force between tires and the roadway are highly variable. The friction depends on the tire pressure and tire composition. 

...read more.

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate Physics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate Physics essays

  1. Aim: ...

    Repeat steps 2-10 again so that you have a 2nd trial (this is handy because you can obtain an average result in order to eliminate any errors) 12. Repeat steps 2-11 using more books, this will give the 2nd larger angle 13.

  2. Analyzing Uniform Circular Motion

    m = 35.254 �0.059 Hz2kg-1 (total absolute error) Therefore, we can thus conclude that there was yet again a high amount of uncertainty and it will be calculated through the percent error. The systematic error still exists, however random errors are not as frequent in this experiment. Conclusion The graphical analysis states all the basic trends attained from the graph.

  1. In this extended essay, I will be investigating projectile motion via studying the movement ...

    k = spring constant of the spring, x = compressed spring length, m = mass of metal ball, y = projection height, g = gravity. The factors of projection height, from the equation derived above, Range ?Vy The range should increases as y (projection height)

  2. Experiment on looking at enthalpy of solutions

    178,00 15,10 15,10 15,10 179,00 15,10 15,10 15,10 180,00 15,20 15,10 15,15 181,00 15,20 15,10 15,15 182,00 15,10 15,10 15,10 183,00 15,10 15,10 15,10 184,00 15,10 15,10 15,10 185,00 15,10 15,10 15,10 186,00 15,10 15,10 15,10 187,00 15,10 15,10 15,10 188,00 15,10 15,10 15,10 189,00 15,10 15,20 15,15 190,00 15,10

  1. Suspension Bridges. this extended essay is an investigation to study the variation in tension ...

    � 0.007 38.5 33 0.7523 � 0.008 36.7 0.7100 � 0.007 66.3 38.5 0.7025 � 0.007 41.5 0.6649 � 0.006 84.3 38.1 0.6415 � 0.006 41.2 0.6017 � 0.006 101 34.5 0.5632 � 0.005 38 0.5170 � 0.005 117 27.9 0.4455 � 0.004 32 0.3917 � 0.004 126 23.1 0.3274

  2. Physics IA -motion

    The following formula can be utilized to find this, percentage uncertainty = (uncertainty/value) � 100. After finding the percentage uncertainty, one is able to find a more accurate uncertainty for the "I.V. km/h" Finding velocity and Accuracy To be able to compare the R.G.

  1. An investigation into the relationship between distance and sound

    Calculations for the gradient of the graph: m = (y2 - y1) / ( x2 - x1) m = ( 102.7 - 80.3) units / ( 10 - 1)cm m = 2.481 units/cm Calculations for the minimum and the maximum gradients: mmax = ( 104 - 81)

  2. HL Physics Revision Notes

    Energy Density = energy release from fuel/mass of fuel consumed State the relative proportions of world use of the different energy sources that are available. Oil: 38%; Coal: 26%; Gas: 23%; Hydroelectric: 6%; Nuclear: 6%; Renewables: 1%. Renewable energy: Solar: 44%; Wind: 27%; Geothermal: 17%; Biofuels: 12% Fossil Fuel Production:

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work