• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Laten Heat of Fusion Physic 20 IB Lab

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

                dan Stoica

                October 12th, 2009

Latent Heat of Fusion

Problem:How does water temperature affect the latent heat of fusion?

Variables:The Manipulated is the water temperature.
The Responding variable is the latent heat of fusion.
The controlled variables are the mass and volume of the ice cube, the mass and volume of the water, room temperature, and the initial temperature of the ice cube.

Variables will be controlled by: using the same kind of ice cube from the same freezer. Using a measuring cup to have the same amount of water every time. Keeping the furnace at a constant 22 degrees Celsius.

Materials:

  • Measuring cup
  • Ice cube
  • Water
  • Thermometer

Procedure:

  1. Prepare 1 cup of room temperature water(22°C)
...read more.

Middle

Initial Temp of Ice Cube(±0.05°C)

Final Water Temp(±0.05°C)

-10.75

17.80

-10.75

9.6

-10.75

9.7

Mass of Water

0.236 Kg

Mass of Icecube

0.010 Kg

Processing Raw Data:
Calculations for Latent Heat of Fusion at 22°C(all temperatures converted to °K)

        Q
water=mwcw(295°K – 290.8°K)

Qice=miceL        + micecw(290.8°K – 273°K) + miceCice

...read more.

Conclusion

Improving:

An electronic and more accurate thermometer could be used. The temperature of the ice cube could be measured inside the freezer to prevent it from heating, and then immediately placed into the cup of water. When heating the water to the desired temperature, an accurate device and thermometer should be used to get the water to exactly the necessary temperature.

Page  of

...read more.

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate Physics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate Physics essays

  1. IB Latent Heat of Fusion of Ice Lab

    � 0.10 �C 13.00 9.50 Change in temperature for the ice (�C) � 0.05 �C 4.00 7.00 Mass of calorimeter and water and ice (g) � 0.01 g 81.32 91.08 Mass of ice that was added (g) � 0.02 g 10.34 7.50 It is assumed that the initial temperature of

  2. Specific latent heat of fusion of ice

    * Then I heated the water in the beaker to a certain temperature, and recorded the temperature as T1. * Then I filled the calorimeter with some ice, and measured the new mass. Then I calculated the mass of the ice added by ((mass of calorimeter + ice)

  1. Experiment to Measure the Heat of Fusion of Ice

    + (107*4.19*33) = 20245 J Second Trial ?Qlost = (183.5*0.9*30.5) + (118.5*4.19*30.5) = 20181 J Heat of Fusion ?Qlost = ?Qgained mccc?T + mwcw?T = miHf + micw?Ti Hf = ?Qlost - micw?Ti mi First Trial Hf = (20245 - 33.2*4.19*37)

  2. IB Specific Heat Capacity Lab

    = � 0.50 oC = (0.50 � 52.00) � 100 = 0.96 % Heat absorbed by water (Hw) MW � CW � ?T = 64.35 � 4.18 � 4 = 1075.93 J = (0.03 + 12.5)% � 1075.93 = 12.53 % � 1075.93 = � 134.810 J Heat absorbed by Calorimeter (HC)

  1. specific heat of a solid

    heat capacity, which was 10.7%, compared to the 20.8% of the aluminium block with the insulator, meaning that the aluminium block by itself had a closer value to the real specific heat capacity. But equally neither of them was very accurate, meaning that the system had a systematic error.

  2. Pendulum Lab

    Using a microwave, the chocolate was melted in a microwave safe plastic container at 20-second intervals, stirring occasionally until the chocolate became liquid. 8. Using a small spoon the chocolate was poured into the mould created by the wooden slab.

  1. The Latent Heat of Fusion

    Therefore, the percentage discrepancy is equal to 17%. Also, the theoretical percentage uncertainty is equal to 11%. I will discuss these finding in conclusion and evaluation part. Conclusion and evaluation: The percentage discrepancy of 17% shows that the determination was done quite precisely.

  2. HL Physics Revision Notes

    Describe the de Broglie hypothesis and the concept of matter waves The de Broglie hypothesis states that all particles can act and travel as waves and have an associated wavelength defined ?=p/h, where p is the momentum of the particle, and h is Planck?s constant.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work