• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Motion due to a Steady Force - Lab

Extracts from this document...


Timmy Bendiš – 10.11.2008 – 3mm

Motion due to a steady force


Verify Newton’s 2nd law of motion



mw - Mass of the weight

mt - Mass of the trolley (controlled, kept constant)

s - Distance (controlled, kept constant)


Δt - Time (measured)

a - Acceleration (calculated from measured time and distance)

F - Pulling Force (calculated from mass mw)

        Fair test:

We presume this test to be fair, because all variables of the system are kept constant, except mass of the weight that generates pulling force that we presume affects the acceleration of the trolley, which is what we want to measure.


- trolley

- 10 different weights (for 10 different trials)

- string (to make the trolley travel in a straight line and have the weights pull it down... the weights are tied to the string which is tied to the trolley.)

...read more.







Table 1. Mass of the weights and trolley travelling times

Data Processing

In Table 2, we processed the collected data from Table 1, using the following formulas :

Applied pulling force = mwx g

Measured acceleration  image00.png

Measured pulling force = image01.png

Uncertainty of measured acceleration (sample for trial #1):

image02.png Estimated reaction time is 0,2 seconds

Ideal acceleration (per Newton’s 2nd law)  image03.png


Applied pulling force (N)

Measured acceleration (ms-2)

...read more.


Sources of error

  1. It was difficult to precisely measure time. Our reaction time was large compared to the travelling time of the trolley. This contributed the most to the acceleration uncertainty.
  2. We measured time only once for each trial.
  3. We ignored the  friction, since we angled the table. But, we suspect that friction also contributed to the uncertainty of the results.


  1. Lengthen the trolley travelling time to reduce the relative time measurement error. For example, we could raise table and lenghten the string.
  2. Measure the time in each trial multiple times (three at the minimum).
  3. Eliminate some of the smaller weights from the measurement, to minimize effect of the friction force at lower speeds.
  4. Use smoother surface.
  5. Keep total mass constant. This means that we start with maximum Weight and move the mass from the Weight to the trolley for each trial. Then the lines in both graphs would be more linear.

...read more.

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate Physics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate Physics essays

  1. Suspension Bridges. this extended essay is an investigation to study the variation in tension ...

    This is the reason why the curves for all the four lengths are very close to each other unlike the nylon string. Conclusion * Variation in tension with point of application of force My hypothesis of a linear increasing trend for both the strings was proved wrong by Graphs 1 and 2.

  2. Determination of Coefficient of Friction

    = ?l/l + ?h/h -> ?? = ? (?l/l + ?h/h) ?? = 15.6 (0.1/51.3 + 0.3/13.8) = 0.4� ?? = 0.4� ?? = 0.4� ?? = 0.4� ?? = 0.4� Now I will find the static coefficient of friction.

  1. Circular Motion Practical - The graphs show that there is a positive correlation between ...

    into account of the friction in the calculation, and thus calculate all the frictional force acting on the body. Yet this method is indeed not very practical, as it is extremely difficult (at least for us student) to measure all the fictional.

  2. Analyzing Uniform Circular Motion

    = 2 F2 = Relative Error F2 = Absolute Error This process was followed to attain the correct uncertainty and the actual value for each of the values represented in the data above. For the following tables, which require the reciprocal of the original independent value, the same method was use (for e.g.

  1. Physics IA -motion

    further add to the possible error, may have slowed down before the 10m mark in order not to hit the velocity recorder. This is why a distance of 5m was used instead of 10m. As a result of not travelling a constant velocity through the 10 metres, the person recording

  2. Circular motion lab

    This is shown in the next table. No. Length (L) [in cm] � 0.05 cm Time average (in seconds) � 0.05 s Time average (For 1 Oscillation) � 0.05 s 1. 49.00 11.06 0.55 2. 50.00 11.52 0.58 3. 51.00 11.24 0.56 4.

  1. Investigate the Size of Craters in Sand Due to Dropped Object.

    r �d = (22/7) x (1.9) � x 0.2 = 2.27 cm � 4.00 0.40 = ? r �d = (22/7) x (1.9) � x 0.4 = 4.54 cm � 6.00 0.60 = ? r �d = (22/7) x (1.9) � x 0.6 = 6.81 cm � 8.00 0.80 = ?

  2. Investigation into the relationship between acceleration and the angle of free fall downhill

    and the angle of the slope. The gradient of this linear relationship would then replace g in the equation. If we take the any value of sin ? from the graph, in this case 0.219, we can calculate the value of the acceleration at that angle: This value obtained should be the one shown in the graph, i.e.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work