• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Motion due to a Steady Force - Lab

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Timmy Bendiš – 10.11.2008 – 3mm

Motion due to a steady force

Aim

Verify Newton’s 2nd law of motion

Variables

        Independent:

mw - Mass of the weight

mt - Mass of the trolley (controlled, kept constant)

s - Distance (controlled, kept constant)

        Dependent:

Δt - Time (measured)

a - Acceleration (calculated from measured time and distance)

F - Pulling Force (calculated from mass mw)

        Fair test:

We presume this test to be fair, because all variables of the system are kept constant, except mass of the weight that generates pulling force that we presume affects the acceleration of the trolley, which is what we want to measure.


Materials

- trolley

- 10 different weights (for 10 different trials)

- string (to make the trolley travel in a straight line and have the weights pull it down... the weights are tied to the string which is tied to the trolley.)

...read more.

Middle

10

0,251

1,101

0,63

1,07

Table 1. Mass of the weights and trolley travelling times


Data Processing

In Table 2, we processed the collected data from Table 1, using the following formulas :

Applied pulling force = mwx g

Measured acceleration  image00.png

Measured pulling force = image01.png

Uncertainty of measured acceleration (sample for trial #1):

image02.png Estimated reaction time is 0,2 seconds

Ideal acceleration (per Newton’s 2nd law)  image03.png

Trial

Applied pulling force (N)

Measured acceleration (ms-2)

...read more.

Conclusion

Sources of error

  1. It was difficult to precisely measure time. Our reaction time was large compared to the travelling time of the trolley. This contributed the most to the acceleration uncertainty.
  2. We measured time only once for each trial.
  3. We ignored the  friction, since we angled the table. But, we suspect that friction also contributed to the uncertainty of the results.

Improvements

  1. Lengthen the trolley travelling time to reduce the relative time measurement error. For example, we could raise table and lenghten the string.
  2. Measure the time in each trial multiple times (three at the minimum).
  3. Eliminate some of the smaller weights from the measurement, to minimize effect of the friction force at lower speeds.
  4. Use smoother surface.
  5. Keep total mass constant. This means that we start with maximum Weight and move the mass from the Weight to the trolley for each trial. Then the lines in both graphs would be more linear.

...read more.

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate Physics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate Physics essays

  1. Centripetal Force

    Maintain the speed of revolution and measure the time taken for 10 revolutions of the small mass. 7. Add an extra 10 g to the mass carrier and repeat steps 2 and 3. 8. Add another 10 g to the mass carrier and repeat steps 2 and 3.

  2. Investigate the Size of Craters in Sand Due to Dropped Object.

    Volume of Craters, cm � Uncertainties = � 0.05 Uncertainties = � 0.05 1 2.00 0.10 1.13 � 0.60 4.00 0.20 2.27 � 0.63 6.00 0.40 4.44 � 0.67 8.00 0.50 5.67 � 0.72 10.00 0.70 7.94 � 0.78 12.00 0.80 9.07 � 0.81 2 2.00 0.30 3.40 � 0.66

  1. Analyzing Uniform Circular Motion

    0.002 1.55 0.002 0.28 1.71 0.003 1.71 0.003 Sample Calculation for frequency (uncertainty) For radius = 0.53 m; T1 = 0.819 s (+/- 0.001s) (Convert to relative uncertainty) Data table # 5: Frequency2 for (1/r) [with respect to the formula attained] 1/r � 0.002 m^-1 Frequency ^2 (Hz^2) Uncertainty (�)

  2. This lab will test the effects of the surface area factor on acceleration due ...

    floor, he will stop the stop watch and record the time of descent of the paper. 5. The person below the apparatus will record data after each trial; a total of 5 trials will be recorded for every change in surface area.

  1. Determination of Coefficient of Friction

    I provide all this information in the table above. Data processing: Now I will calculate the mean of height just before starting the block to move. (13.9+13.4+14.0)/3 = 13.8 cm (11.2+12.6+11.9)/3 = 11.9 cm (10.5+10.0+10.9)/3 = 10.5 cm (10.5+9.9+9.9)/3 = 10.1 cm (9.2+8.9+8.9)/3 = 9.0 cm Now I need to find the angle between the wooden plane and the surface.

  2. Circular motion lab

    50.00 11.52 0.58 3. 51.00 11.24 0.56 4. 52.00 12.24 0.61 5. 53.00 13.02 0.65 6. 54.00 14.12 0.71 7. 55.00 14.92 0.75 8. 56.00 16.06 0.80 9. 57.00 16.80 0.84 10. 58.00 17.60 0.88 Now that we have the time period for one oscillation for every length, we can use this to find the acceleration due to gravity.

  1. IBPhysics - Circular Motion Lab -MedepalliD

    3 30� .05cm 2.13�0.02 1.89 � 0.02 2.09�0.02 40� .05cm 1.76�0.02 1.83�0.02 1.80�0.02 50� .05cm 1.59�0.02 1.65�0.02 1.69�0.02 60� .05cm 1.30�0.02 1.47�0.02 1.53�0.02 70� .05cm 1.35 � 0.02 1.37 � 0.02 1.36�0.02 How to Convert into m/s -1 Rev/s* 2??r 2.13�.02 * 2??r 2.13 (2)

  2. Horizontal Circular Motion Lab

    10 revolutions made by the stopper and react to it at the same time, furthermore, the stopper?s speed must vary for every trial because the swinging motion is controlled manually, unless the swinging technique is fully mastered, the force applied to swing the glass tube should always be different, therefore resulting a significant systematic error.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work