• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Motion due to a Steady Force - Lab

Extracts from this document...


Timmy Bendiš – 10.11.2008 – 3mm

Motion due to a steady force


Verify Newton’s 2nd law of motion



mw - Mass of the weight

mt - Mass of the trolley (controlled, kept constant)

s - Distance (controlled, kept constant)


Δt - Time (measured)

a - Acceleration (calculated from measured time and distance)

F - Pulling Force (calculated from mass mw)

        Fair test:

We presume this test to be fair, because all variables of the system are kept constant, except mass of the weight that generates pulling force that we presume affects the acceleration of the trolley, which is what we want to measure.


- trolley

- 10 different weights (for 10 different trials)

- string (to make the trolley travel in a straight line and have the weights pull it down... the weights are tied to the string which is tied to the trolley.)

...read more.







Table 1. Mass of the weights and trolley travelling times

Data Processing

In Table 2, we processed the collected data from Table 1, using the following formulas :

Applied pulling force = mwx g

Measured acceleration  image00.png

Measured pulling force = image01.png

Uncertainty of measured acceleration (sample for trial #1):

image02.png Estimated reaction time is 0,2 seconds

Ideal acceleration (per Newton’s 2nd law)  image03.png


Applied pulling force (N)

Measured acceleration (ms-2)

...read more.


Sources of error

  1. It was difficult to precisely measure time. Our reaction time was large compared to the travelling time of the trolley. This contributed the most to the acceleration uncertainty.
  2. We measured time only once for each trial.
  3. We ignored the  friction, since we angled the table. But, we suspect that friction also contributed to the uncertainty of the results.


  1. Lengthen the trolley travelling time to reduce the relative time measurement error. For example, we could raise table and lenghten the string.
  2. Measure the time in each trial multiple times (three at the minimum).
  3. Eliminate some of the smaller weights from the measurement, to minimize effect of the friction force at lower speeds.
  4. Use smoother surface.
  5. Keep total mass constant. This means that we start with maximum Weight and move the mass from the Weight to the trolley for each trial. Then the lines in both graphs would be more linear.

...read more.

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate Physics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate Physics essays

  1. Ohm's Law lab

    DCP Graph 1.2 - Graph showing the plotted readings for the bulb filament immersed in water with the ammeter reading (A) on the y-axis and the voltmeter reading on the x-axis and showing line of best fit. Error bars cannot be shown as the magnitude of error � (1 - 5)% is insignificant on the graph.

  2. centripetal force lab (DCP, CE)

    The length of the string may differ between each trial. The string is marked to unsure that the length of the string in the circular motion remains constant.

  1. Determination of Coefficient of Friction

    I will find it for every situation in this way: sin?=height/plane length -> ?=arcsin(height/plane length): ?=arcsin(13.8/51.3)=15.6� ?=arcsin(11.9/51.3)=13.4� ?=arcsin(10.5/51.3)=11.8� ?=arcsin(10.1/51.3)=11.4� ?=arcsin(9.0/51.3)=10.1� Now I will determine the absolute uncertainty of angle measurements. To do this I will have to add relative uncertainties for every situation and the biggest found uncertainty will be taken as the absolute uncertainty for the angle measurements.

  2. Centripetal Force

    Maintain the speed of revolution and measure the time taken for 10 revolutions of the small mass. 7. Add an extra 10 g to the mass carrier and repeat steps 2 and 3. 8. Add another 10 g to the mass carrier and repeat steps 2 and 3.

  1. Analyzing Uniform Circular Motion

    However, the idea of reaction time will be explained later on in the Section of Evaluation). The most important qualitative observation recorded was the idea of the radius of the circular movement, not being the length of the string. Due to disequilibrium of the force exerted for the motion to

  2. Investigation into the relationship between acceleration and the angle of free fall downhill

    The uncertainties that had a significant effect on the investigation were the ones for times measured. When measuring the time taken for the cart to go downhill a systematic error could?ve occurred, this could be classified as a parallax error.

  1. HL Physics Revision Notes

    of high-voltage step-up and step-down transformers in the transmission of electrical power. A step-up transformer increases the voltage for economic reasons; there is no ideal value of voltage for electrical transmission. Suggest how extra-low-frequency electromagnetic fields such as those created by electrical appliances and power lines induce currents within a

  2. Horizontal Circular Motion Lab

    ±0.25s for the timing uncertainty should be a fair assumption. Then, Calculations for Tension of String: Since v is unknown, we must calculate it, and then we can substitute its value in the centripetal force formula Calculations For Since the rubber stopper travelled 10 revolutions on average in every 3.49s,

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work