• Join over 1.2 million students every month
• Accelerate your learning by 29%
• Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

# Motion due to a Steady Force - Lab

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Timmy Bendiš – 10.11.2008 – 3mm

Motion due to a steady force

Aim

Verify Newton’s 2nd law of motion

Variables

Independent:

mw - Mass of the weight

mt - Mass of the trolley (controlled, kept constant)

s - Distance (controlled, kept constant)

Dependent:

Δt - Time (measured)

a - Acceleration (calculated from measured time and distance)

F - Pulling Force (calculated from mass mw)

Fair test:

We presume this test to be fair, because all variables of the system are kept constant, except mass of the weight that generates pulling force that we presume affects the acceleration of the trolley, which is what we want to measure.

Materials

- trolley

- 10 different weights (for 10 different trials)

- string (to make the trolley travel in a straight line and have the weights pull it down... the weights are tied to the string which is tied to the trolley.)

Middle

10

0,251

1,101

0,63

1,07

Table 1. Mass of the weights and trolley travelling times

Data Processing

In Table 2, we processed the collected data from Table 1, using the following formulas :

Applied pulling force = mwx g

Measured acceleration Measured pulling force = Uncertainty of measured acceleration (sample for trial #1): Estimated reaction time is 0,2 seconds

Ideal acceleration (per Newton’s 2nd law) Trial Applied pulling force (N) Measured acceleration (ms-2)

Conclusion

Sources of error

1. It was difficult to precisely measure time. Our reaction time was large compared to the travelling time of the trolley. This contributed the most to the acceleration uncertainty.
2. We measured time only once for each trial.
3. We ignored the  friction, since we angled the table. But, we suspect that friction also contributed to the uncertainty of the results.

Improvements

1. Lengthen the trolley travelling time to reduce the relative time measurement error. For example, we could raise table and lenghten the string.
2. Measure the time in each trial multiple times (three at the minimum).
3. Eliminate some of the smaller weights from the measurement, to minimize effect of the friction force at lower speeds.
4. Use smoother surface.
5. Keep total mass constant. This means that we start with maximum Weight and move the mass from the Weight to the trolley for each trial. Then the lines in both graphs would be more linear.

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate Physics section.

## Found what you're looking for?

• Start learning 29% faster today
• 150,000+ documents available
• Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
• Join over 1.2 million students every month
• Accelerate your learning by 29%
• Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

# Related International Baccalaureate Physics essays

1. ## Investigate the Size of Craters in Sand Due to Dropped Object.

0.90 4 2.00 0.20 2.27 � 0.63 4.00 0.40 4.54 � 0.69 6.00 0.60 6.81 � 0.75 8.00 0.80 9.07 � 0.81 10.00 0.90 10.21� 0.84 12.00 1.10 12.48� 0.90 Theory (Graph): The volumes of the craters are clearly proportional to the depth of the craters.

2. ## centripetal force lab (DCP, CE)

The length of the string may differ between each trial. The string is marked to unsure that the length of the string in the circular motion remains constant.

1. ## Suspension Bridges. this extended essay is an investigation to study the variation in tension ...

that as the length of the string tied between the two supports decreases, the tension values increases. It is not only the maximum tension, but in fact tension at all points of application of force is more when the length of the string is 140 cm.

2. ## Centripetal Force

Maintain the speed of revolution and measure the time taken for 10 revolutions of the small mass. 7. Add an extra 10 g to the mass carrier and repeat steps 2 and 3. 8. Add another 10 g to the mass carrier and repeat steps 2 and 3.

1. ## Ohm's Law lab

Error bars cannot be shown as the magnitude of error � (1 - 5)% is insignificant on the graph. Graphical Observations: * The graph does not pass through the origin * The plotted V-I values are directly proportional, with a slight deviation which can be accounted for by errors.

2. ## Horizontal Circular Motion Lab

10 revolutions made by the stopper and react to it at the same time, furthermore, the stopper?s speed must vary for every trial because the swinging motion is controlled manually, unless the swinging technique is fully mastered, the force applied to swing the glass tube should always be different, therefore resulting a significant systematic error.

1. ## Investigation into the relationship between acceleration and the angle of free fall downhill

line which means that the value of 1.11 m s-2 isn?t an incorrect value, leaving room for a possible systematic error. The results seem reasonable taken into account that the values measured were all relatively small, which can give a wider set of results.

2. ## HL Physics Revision Notes

For normal vision this is taken to be 25cm Define angular magnification Angle subtended at eye normally/Angle subtended at eye using instrument Derive an expression for the angular magnification of a simple magnifying glass for an image formed at the near point and at infinity Image formed at the near • Over 160,000 pieces
of student written work
• Annotated by
experienced teachers
• Ideas and feedback to 