• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Oscillatory Motion

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Physics 20 - Lab 3.4 Oscillatory Motion Aim Use a Motion Sensor to collect time and distance data for a vertically oscillating spring-mass system. Problem What is the rate of energy loss in a horizontal spring - mass system over time? Hypothesis Knowing the properties of spring-mass systems, the rate of energy loss should be positive, since it is not a perfect spring. While the acceleration changes, the velocity changes as well and as it moves in its simple harmonic motion, each time it completes a period, its displacement will not be the same as the previous displacement. The graph would therefore look like a wave, but as time progress, come closer to 0 (complete stop), indicating a loss in velocity, or kinetic energy. Materials * Mass (896.84 g � 0.005 g) * Motion sensor * Vacuum * Two Elastics Variables Independent Variable * The time provided for the horizontal spring-mass system to oscillate several times. Dependant Variable * The velocity of the horizontal oscillating spring-mass system. Controlled Variables * The spring * The mass * The motion sensor Controlling of the Variables Independent Variable: The time was controlled by the motion sensor provided, which was 10 seconds. ...read more.

Middle

0.220 15.8007 0.240 15.9009 0.311 16.0012 0.415 15.4013 0.440 15.5010 0.333 15.6007 0.255 15.7006 0.220 15.8007 0.240 15.9009 0.311 16.0012 0.415 15.4013 0.440 15.5010 0.333 15.6007 0.255 15.7006 0.220 15.8007 0.240 15.9009 0.311 16.0012 0.415 Table 2. The Kinetic Energy at the Peak of Each Oscillation. The values chosen were at the peak of each oscillation. Because there were 7 peaks, 7 values were chosen. Kinetic energy was calculated by using f(x) = Time (s � 0.00005s) Velocity (m/s � 0.005s) Kinetic Energy (J) 0.0645 1.07 0.513876916 1.7896 0.76 0.259249984 3.4896 0.54 0.130881744 5.1146 0.41 0.075450004 6.7146 0.3 0.0403956 8.4396 0.25 0.0280525 9.9646 0.11 0.005430964 Data Processing Graph 1. The Change in Velocity Of A Horizontal Spring - Mass System Over Time. The uncertainties for both velocity and time were too small to be seen and were excluded from the graph. We must, however, take into consideration that they are there. A bigger version of this graph will be attached at the end of this lab. Graph 2. The Change in the Kinetic Energy Over Time. The uncertainties were too small to be seen and were excluded from the graph. We must, however, take into consideration that they are there. ...read more.

Conclusion

and time (s) for a horizontally oscillating spring-mass system. The graph shows that as time increases, the velocity of the horizontal spring-mass system decreases gradually (from about 1.03 m/s to 0.12 m/s). Therefore, we can conclude that there is a net loss in energy from the system ( J per second), which is caused by friction, which slows down the spring-mass and decreases the velocity. The wave-like pattern in the graph is caused when the spring-mass system is released from its maximum displacement; the restoring force pulls it to towards the opposite side (since velocity is a vector, this produces a negative velocity), and then back again to its beginning point, slowing down slightly due to friction. A major source of error came from the air resistance and friction, which caused the spring-mass system to gradually slow. In reality, due to simple harmonic motion, the system would continue to oscillate for an infinite period of time. However, to completely eliminate this friction would be very difficult; though the effects of friction were reduced by the air being forced under the spring to create an "air-hockey" effect. To improve on this further, I would recommend lubricants on the surfaces in contact (the rail and spring). There will always be air resistance in this experiment. If these issues are rectified, then future experiments concerning this method of experimentation will provide more accurate results. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate Physics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate Physics essays

  1. This is a practical to investigate the relationship between time period for oscillations and ...

    Since my values of time have an uncertainty during the experiment, my human reaction time is the uncertainty. The uncertainty for average time is found by adding the general difference between the average time and each of the three readings and dividing it by the number of readings which in this case is 3.

  2. Finding the Spring Constant

    The theoretical value I obtained from my previous lab for the value of k (Spring constant)was 28.701 Nm-1 Thus, %Difference = [(Theoretical value - Experimental value) � (Theoretical value) (x 100)] = > % Difference = [(28.701 - 25.980) � (28.701)

  1. Centripetal Force

    Then rotated automatically and measured the time taken for 10 revolutions of the small mass. The variable that I changed was the mass of the load. These changes would take effect on the dependent variable which was the frequency of the swing hence centripetal force.

  2. Determination of Coefficient of Friction

    To do this I will have to add relative uncertainties: ? � / � = ??/? + ??/? -> ? � = �*2??/? ? � = 0.28*2*0.4/15.6 = 0.01 ? � = 0.01 ? � = 0.01 ? � = 0.01 ?

  1. Analyzing Uniform Circular Motion

    Hanging Mass (+/-0.01g) Period for 10 cycles (+/-0.01s) Period For 1 cycle (+/- 0.001s) 12.91 9.49 0.949 9.64 0.964 26.58 8.63 0.863 8.98 0.898 38.42 7.89 0.789 7.61 0.761 51.47 6.31 0.631 6.23 0.623 64.71 5.91 0.591 6.11 0.611 Hanging Mass (+/-0.00001kg)

  2. IBPhysics - Circular Motion Lab -MedepalliD

    The above graph is the graph of the accepted values from the formula we created. WE can see that this graph looks constant as opposed to the other graph and seems not to have much error involved. Once again the error bars are hard to see, but they too have their own individual error.

  1. Simple Harmonic Motion Physics HL Lab Report

    * The 10 number of swings were timed using a stopwatch. * A piece of paper was placed exactly behind the pendulum with a line marked on it. This line was used as the reference point from which the timing was started and stopped and was measured with the help

  2. Horizontal Circular Motion Lab

    applied to the tube would have to be constant with just the right amount at all timed intervals. Throughout the experiment, the fatigue of the arm of the experimentalists was evident; this could have contributed even more to the x direction of the swing.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work