• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Physics Friction Lab Report

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Coefficient of Friction Lab

Planning B –

Apparatus:

  •  Pulley (minimum friction)
  •  String (minimum friction)
  •  Sandpaper sheet
  •  Wooden block
  •  Various masses (5g, 10g, 20g.. etc)
  •  Mass-hook (holder)
  •  Sticky tape
  •  Electronic scale (one per class)

Method:

  1. Gather all necessary materials listed above
  2. Using the electronic scale, measure the mass of the wooden block and record this, taking into account uncertainties where applicable.
  3. Attach the string to the wooden block, and the other end to a mass-hook.
  4. Place the sheet of sandpaper underneath the block and tape the sheet firmly in place on the table using sticky-tape (also note the exact position of the block on the sheet as we will try to keep that constant throughout)
  5. Screw on the adjustable pulley at one edge of a laboratory table
  6. Hang the mass hook off the table, using the mass pulley – if this already causes the block to move, then place a small weight on top of the block.  You set-up should look the following:
...read more.

Middle

Trial

Normal Reaction Force /N

Force of friction /N

±0.05 N

Average Force of Friction /N

±0.15 N

Friction Coefficient

Avg. Coefficient

± 0.05

1

2.25

1.74

1.74

0.78

0.77

2

1.73

0.77

3

1.74

0.77

Test 3

Trial

Normal Reaction Force /N

Force of friction /N

±0.05 N

Average Force of Friction /N

±0.15 N

Friction Coefficient

Avg. Coefficient

± 0.05

1

3.25

2.51

2.51

0.77

0.77

2

2.51

0.77

3

2.49

0.77

Test 4

Trial

Normal Reaction Force /N

...read more.

Conclusion

image03.png

        Note that this will give use the static coefficient of friction, which is different from the dynamic coefficient, but is what we were instructed to find in this particular lab.  To find our average coefficient of static friction, taking into account all the tests and all the trials, we would have (0.76 + 0.77 + 0.77 + 0.78 + 0.79) / 5 = image02.png

image02.png = 0.77 ± 0.05

        On the following page you will find a graph that plots the frictional force Ffr versus the normal reaction force R.  There is a clear linear relationship between the two forces, and this line should, ideally, pass through the origin.  

Uncertainties, and moreover, systematic error, have caused this line shift. For example, the friction of between the puller and the string meant that not all of the weight of the mass was transferred to pull the block, but since this happened every time, the relationship still holds although it is not from the origin.  Moreover, as we continued carrying out this experiment, one must keep in mind that the sandpaper was getting more and more “worn”, which reduces friction for the consequential trials.

...read more.

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate Physics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate Physics essays

  1. physics lab report. Aim To determine the coefficient of static ...

    This assumption causes error in the readings because at the instant of motion the weight of the hanging masses is slightly greater than the frictional force acting on the block. 6. Not taking a conducting a sufficient number of trials. Improvements 1. Using a more accurate balance: e.g.

  2. Determination of Coefficient of Friction

    for every situation: When I added 0 weights, �kinetic = 0.15 / 0.60 = 0.25; When I added 1 weight, �kinetic = 0.30 / 1.60 = 0.1875; When I added 2 weights, �kinetic = 0.50 / 2.60 = 0.1923; When I added 3 weights, �kinetic = 0.65 / 3.60 =

  1. IA Lab report rubber bands

    This would have removed air resistance. However, the experiment probably would not have been affected that much, but it would have been improved, at least to some extent.

  2. Suspension Bridges. this extended essay is an investigation to study the variation in tension ...

    The tension starts decreasing with increasing length. However, the decrease in the tension values is not at all linear or equal. Rather, the area between the curve of 140 cm and 144 cm is larger compared to that between 144 cm and 148 cm.

  1. Investigating the friction created on different surfaces. Factors that affect range of catapult

    26 26 Conclusion As it can be seen from the data presented in Table 1 as well as Graph 1 the box with its glass surface exposed to the cement floor was able to travel farthest and had the longest range.

  2. Pendulum Lab

    from the right edge were marked, and 1 cm and 2 cm from the bottom were marked. 4. Steps 2 and 3 were repeated on the remaining two wooden slats. 5. The slats were arranged to obtain the dimensions: 1cm x 2 cm x 6cm 6. Chocolate chips were obtained.

  1. Research question: Part A : What is the static friction coefficient of ...

    Thus, it can be concluded that the surfaces are rougher. *Basically, the hypothesis for both experiment are the same as the difference is only due to the static and the kinetic motion Theory: In life, there is two types of friction; static friction and kinetic friction.

  2. HL Physics Revision Notes

    The escape of the higher-energy particles will lower the average kinetic energy and thus lower the temperature. ? While boiling, substance gains enough potential energy to break free from inter-particle forces. Similar to evaporation, the only difference being that energy is supplied from external source so there is no decrease in temperature When condensing it?s the opposite of boiling.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work