• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Research question: Part A : What is the static friction coefficient of a certain surfaces that are in contact? Part B : What is the kinetic friction coefficient of a certain surfaces that are in contact?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

NAME

MOHD SUKRI BIN ISMAIL

PARTNER

FIKRI AKMAL MOHD SALLEH

CLASS

E03F

DATE

September 6th, 2004 and September 14th, 2004

TITLE

INVESTIGATION OF THE ROUGHNESS OF TWO SURFACES IN CONTACT

(friction)


Abstract:

This experiment is conducted in two different parts; part A is the determination of the static friction coefficient whilst part B is the determination of the kinetic friction coefficient. In part A, after the apparatus are set up as shown in the diagram, the length of the wood plane used as the track is measured. Then, the plane is elevated gradually at one of its end. The plane is held still using a retort stand when the block rested on the plane is moving, in order to reduce the error in measuring the height of the elevated end of the plane from the desk surface. The experiment is then repeated by using different surfaces which were between glass/wood and wood/sand paper. The value of the static friction coefficient is calculated by using the formula of image00.png= tanimage01.png or by using the ratio of the height of the elevated end of the plane to the horizontal length of the plane. From the experiment, it can be determined that the static coefficient for wood surface with wood surface is 0.454, glass and wood is 0.315 while the sand paper surface with wood is 0.785.

...read more.

Middle

cm

Horizontal length, image22.pngcm

Coefficient, image04.png

Wood / wood

31.4

69.2

0.454

Wood / sand paper

14.2

18.1

0.785

Wood / glass

5.7

18.1

0.315

Uncertainty;        image02.png

e.g        image03.png

Surfaces

Coefficient, image04.png

Wood / wood

0.454 image05.png

Wood / sand paper

0.785 image06.png

Wood / glass

0.315 image07.png


Part B;

F = ma

mg sin image01.png - image08.png= ma

image09.pngimage10.png

Through out the experiment, the angle of the elevation is fixed at 30image11.png.

Determination of the acceleration of the block;

e.g        Surface; wood / wood

image12.png

initial velocity, u = image13.png = image14.pngcms-1

final velocity, v = image13.png = image15.pngcms-1

...read more.

Conclusion

  1. In determining the coefficient of the static friction, the formula of image00.png= tanimage01.png can be used. Nevertheless, since the method used in this portion of experiment allows the experimenter to choose between two options which are either to use the above equation of to use the ratio of the height of the elevated end of the plane to the horizontal length of the plane. The experimenter choose to use the ratio as error is minimized, compared to the equation.

Conclusion:

Part A        : The greater the coefficient, the rougher the surfaces. The coefficients are different between different surfaces. This is due to the fact that if the object is having bigger angle of inclination, it shows that the coefficient is bigger. Thus, it can be concluded that the surfaces are rougher.

Surfaces

Coefficient, image04.png

Wood / wood

0.454 image05.png

Wood / sand paper

0.785 image06.png

Wood / glass

0.315 image07.png

Part B        : The greater the coefficient, the rougher the surfaces. The coefficients are different between different surfaces. This is due to the fact that if the object is having bigger force to be applied in order to move it, it shows that the coefficient is bigger. Thus, it can be concluded that the surfaces are rougher.

Surfaces

Coefficient, image04.png

Wood / wood

0.3290

Wood / sand paper

0.4780

Wood / glass

0.2390

Contribution:

  1. I suggested to use the acceleration method to determine the kinetic friction
  2. I recorded the results obtained.
  3. I elevated the track.

References:

  1. http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu

...read more.

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate Physics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate Physics essays

  1. physics lab report. Aim To determine the coefficient of static ...

    Absolute error in coefficient of static friction (?�s) = (absolute error in M1 + absolute error in M2) * Coefficient of static friction (?�s) M1 M2 ?�s = (?M1 + ?M2) * �s M1 M2 ?�s = ( 0.05 + 0.05 )

  2. Analyzing Uniform Circular Motion

    And a radius of 0 m means no motion can occur, therefore (0,0) could have been included as a point; although not measured. The y intercept also suggests that the values for the frequencies will be more than the theoretical.

  1. Determination of Coefficient of Friction

    As my used weights were very precise and provided by my teacher I do not include uncertainty to their weights. They were 1N each. Therefore, I leave the absolute uncertainty of the normal force the same as the weight of the block as the same uncertainty remains.

  2. Coefficient of Static and Kinetic Friction Phys 10 IB LAb

    Static Friction (�0.1N) Kinetic Friction (�0.1N) 1 238 1.0 0.9 2 438 1.6 1.2 3 638 2.2 2.0 4 838 3.3 2.6 5 1038 4.2 3.4 Analysis: =mg therefore =mg Calculating Normal Force on Trial 1: = mg = (0.23817�0.001kg)

  1. Bouncing balls. Research question: What is the relation between the height from which ...

    The curve itself means that there is an acceleration present which causes the ball to change its velocity. Not having enough datas to calculate the velocity - as it was not the point of my experiment- I did not calculate them, but I think that experiment was succesful and gave

  2. How does the mass of a spherical object and the height from which it ...

    of the object dropped: Analysis: From these graphs linear relationships can be observed in mass of the object vs. volume crater depth and the height from which the object is dropped vs. volume crater depth. The positive linear relationship that can be seen in each graph supports the relationship .

  1. Investigating the friction created on different surfaces. Factors that affect range of catapult

    Then the launcher was pulled to a distance of 15 cm from the place where the rubber bands were attached to the legs of the catapult. The spot was marked with a tape. 4. The box was placed on the floor against the launcher of the catapult whilst its glass side exposed downward to the cement.

  2. HL Physics Revision Notes

    Important Outline the Schrödinger model of the hydrogen atom. The model assumes that electrons in the atom may be described by wave functions. The electron has an undefined position, but the square of the amplitude of the wave function gives the probability of finding the electron at a particular point.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work