• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Research question: Part A : What is the static friction coefficient of a certain surfaces that are in contact? Part B : What is the kinetic friction coefficient of a certain surfaces that are in contact?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

NAME

MOHD SUKRI BIN ISMAIL

PARTNER

FIKRI AKMAL MOHD SALLEH

CLASS

E03F

DATE

September 6th, 2004 and September 14th, 2004

TITLE

INVESTIGATION OF THE ROUGHNESS OF TWO SURFACES IN CONTACT

(friction)


Abstract:

This experiment is conducted in two different parts; part A is the determination of the static friction coefficient whilst part B is the determination of the kinetic friction coefficient. In part A, after the apparatus are set up as shown in the diagram, the length of the wood plane used as the track is measured. Then, the plane is elevated gradually at one of its end. The plane is held still using a retort stand when the block rested on the plane is moving, in order to reduce the error in measuring the height of the elevated end of the plane from the desk surface. The experiment is then repeated by using different surfaces which were between glass/wood and wood/sand paper. The value of the static friction coefficient is calculated by using the formula of image00.png= tanimage01.png or by using the ratio of the height of the elevated end of the plane to the horizontal length of the plane. From the experiment, it can be determined that the static coefficient for wood surface with wood surface is 0.454, glass and wood is 0.315 while the sand paper surface with wood is 0.785.

...read more.

Middle

cm

Horizontal length, image22.pngcm

Coefficient, image04.png

Wood / wood

31.4

69.2

0.454

Wood / sand paper

14.2

18.1

0.785

Wood / glass

5.7

18.1

0.315

Uncertainty;        image02.png

e.g        image03.png

Surfaces

Coefficient, image04.png

Wood / wood

0.454 image05.png

Wood / sand paper

0.785 image06.png

Wood / glass

0.315 image07.png


Part B;

F = ma

mg sin image01.png - image08.png= ma

image09.pngimage10.png

Through out the experiment, the angle of the elevation is fixed at 30image11.png.

Determination of the acceleration of the block;

e.g        Surface; wood / wood

image12.png

initial velocity, u = image13.png = image14.pngcms-1

final velocity, v = image13.png = image15.pngcms-1

...read more.

Conclusion

  1. In determining the coefficient of the static friction, the formula of image00.png= tanimage01.png can be used. Nevertheless, since the method used in this portion of experiment allows the experimenter to choose between two options which are either to use the above equation of to use the ratio of the height of the elevated end of the plane to the horizontal length of the plane. The experimenter choose to use the ratio as error is minimized, compared to the equation.

Conclusion:

Part A        : The greater the coefficient, the rougher the surfaces. The coefficients are different between different surfaces. This is due to the fact that if the object is having bigger angle of inclination, it shows that the coefficient is bigger. Thus, it can be concluded that the surfaces are rougher.

Surfaces

Coefficient, image04.png

Wood / wood

0.454 image05.png

Wood / sand paper

0.785 image06.png

Wood / glass

0.315 image07.png

Part B        : The greater the coefficient, the rougher the surfaces. The coefficients are different between different surfaces. This is due to the fact that if the object is having bigger force to be applied in order to move it, it shows that the coefficient is bigger. Thus, it can be concluded that the surfaces are rougher.

Surfaces

Coefficient, image04.png

Wood / wood

0.3290

Wood / sand paper

0.4780

Wood / glass

0.2390

Contribution:

  1. I suggested to use the acceleration method to determine the kinetic friction
  2. I recorded the results obtained.
  3. I elevated the track.

References:

  1. http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu

...read more.

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate Physics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate Physics essays

  1. physics lab report. Aim To determine the coefficient of static ...

    Absolute error in coefficient of static friction (?�s) = (absolute error in M1 + absolute error in M2) * Coefficient of static friction (?�s) M1 M2 ?�s = (?M1 + ?M2) * �s M1 M2 ?�s = ( 0.05 + 0.05 )

  2. Aim: ...

    = 7.3 gm/s Total Kinetic Energy = .0028 J Results for Trail 3, In this case, the incident ball hit the target ball at an angle (65�), giving the following results For incident ball (6.8 grams): s = 0.30 meters t = 0.41 seconds v = 0.73 m/s P =

  1. Analyzing Uniform Circular Motion

    The following trends will be re-evaluated in this section, as well as the percent error will be calculated to describe the inaccuracy of the values. The trend for manipulating the radius of the circular motion is that as the radius increases, the frequency decreases, resulting in an inversely proportional relation between the two.

  2. Bouncing balls. Research question: What is the relation between the height from which ...

    shows presence of the systematic error. As the exact value of air resistance and friction forces were not regarded, the error could occur. Some mistakes and uncertainities are due to: * different types of balls, as each ball have different properties * different types of surface, as again, each have different properties * time of human

  1. Coefficient of Static and Kinetic Friction Phys 10 IB LAb

    Static Friction (�0.1N) Kinetic Friction (�0.1N) 1 238 1.0 0.9 2 438 1.6 1.2 3 638 2.2 2.0 4 838 3.3 2.6 5 1038 4.2 3.4 Analysis: =mg therefore =mg Calculating Normal Force on Trial 1: = mg = (0.23817�0.001kg)

  2. Investigate the Size of Craters in Sand Due to Dropped Object.

    The hypothesis above was decided by considering the potential energy (PE), kinetic energy (KE), conservation of energy and by using impulse concept. Based on the theory, we know that the higher the height, the more its potential energy (PE) and it is also followed by kinetic energy.

  1. Determination of Coefficient of Friction

    As my used weights were very precise and provided by my teacher I do not include uncertainty to their weights. They were 1N each. Therefore, I leave the absolute uncertainty of the normal force the same as the weight of the block as the same uncertainty remains.

  2. Investigation into the relationship between acceleration and the angle of free fall downhill

    Time management wasn?t a problem either, as the trials all consisted in approximately 1 second. The part of the method that took most time to do was changing distance travelled.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work