• Join over 1.2 million students every month
• Accelerate your learning by 29%
• Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

# Specific Heat Capacity Lab data and processing

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Justin Germani        Specific Heat Capacity        January 24, 2012

Data:

Object 1

 Massm/g∆m = ±0.1 g TemperatureT/ (°C)      ∆T= ±0.1°C initial final change Object 62.3 100.3 26.4 -73.9 Aluminum Calorimeter w/ water 156.5 23.1 26.4 +03.3 water 114.0 - - -

Object 2

 Massm/g∆m = ±0.1 g TemperatureT/ (°C)      ∆T= ±0.1°C initial final change Object 34.5 100.6 29.2 -71.4 Aluminum Calorimeter w/ water 155.6 26.2 29.2 +03.0 water 113.1 - - -

Object 3

 Massm/g

Middle

34.4

+06.3

water

112.9

-

-

-

For each table above:
∆- represents uncertainty
-mass of Aluminum Calorimeter is 42.5g

Sample Calculations:

Calculate specific heat capacity (c):

Object 1

Q lost by block = Q gained by water + Q gained by Al 0.0623(c)(-73.9) = 0.114(4200)(03.3) + 0.0425(910)(03.3)
c = 371 J/kg/°C  (3 significant figures)

Results:

 Specific Heat Capacityc / JKg-1°C-1 Object 1 370.9 Object 2 625.6 Object 3 318.9

Data:

Freezing Aluminum block

 Massm/g∆m = ±0.1 g TemperatureT/ (°C)      ∆T= ±0.1°C initial final change Aluminum block 62.3 16.2 Aluminum calorimeter 46.5 - - - Aluminum Calorimeter w/ water 156.5 19.7 16.2 -03.5 water 114.0 - - -

Calculate Initial Temperature of Aluminum block:

Q

Conclusion

The % difference of object two was very large at 31.3% this could be due to random error but more likely due to the block not being fully submerged as I mentioned earlier.

The value of the percentage difference for Object3 which was Copper was relatively high at 17.2%,

In order to improve upon the experiment a scale that measures up to a higher mass such as 500g. Another method to improve the experiment would be to add more water to the calorimeter in order to insure the block was fully submerged. Another improvement that could be made would be to not drop the blocks into the calorimeter and therefore minimize the risk of losing water after the mass was taken.

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate Physics section.

## Found what you're looking for?

• Start learning 29% faster today
• 150,000+ documents available
• Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
• Join over 1.2 million students every month
• Accelerate your learning by 29%
• Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

# Related International Baccalaureate Physics essays

1. ## Specific heat capacity of an unknown metal

- (30 � 0.05))] = [0.0775 x 4200 x (5 � 0.1)] = [0.0775 * 4200 * (5 � 2%)] = [ (1627.5 � 2%) c] = [ (1629.18 � 32.6)] = (1627. 5 � 32. 6) Joules is the amount of heat gained by the cold water.

2. ## AIM: To find the specific heat capacity of a solid by method of mixtures.

* 4.5�1 �C)+(0.0425�0.0001 kg * 390 J kg-1 �C-1 * 4.5 � 1 �C) 0.0246 � 0.0001 * C3 * 68.5 � 1 = (0.03 � 0.0001 * 4186 * 4.5 � 1) + (0.0425 � 0.0001 * 390 * 4.5 � 1)

1. ## Specific latent heat of fusion of ice

] + [ (768.614 � 2.46) ] [ (5117. 28 � 25.6) ] = [ (1975. 32 � 8.4) ] + [ 0. 00942 Lf ] [ 0. 00942 Lf ] = [ (5117. 28 � 25.6) ] - [ (1975. 32 � 8.4) ] [ 0.

2. ## Physics - Specific Heat Capacity of An Unknown Material Lab Report

Measure mass of unknown material. 2) Start boiling water. Better insolate the calorimeters with tin foil and bubble wrap. 3) Measure mass of water, empty calorimeter and unknown material and record. 4) Fill calorimeter with cold water, measure temperature after equilibrium.

1. ## IB Latent Heat of Fusion of Ice Lab

+ (239 J g-1 � 4 J g-1) � 2 = 212 J g-1 � 4 J g-1 Conclusion and Evaluation The literature value of the latent heat of ice of fusion is 334.40 J g-1, as obtained from

2. ## Specific Heat Capacity

In order to minimize the error due to heat, we repeated the same experiment with different levels of power. This allows us to minimize the uncertainties due to heat loss by isolating them from the original equation. Even though we were tried to lower the value of error, it was difficult to minimize it without completely insulating the calorimeter.

1. ## Hooke's Law Intro and data processing

?x = � 0.1 cm Average Force F (N) ?F = � 0.001 N Average Force Uncertainties F (N) 0.0 0.000 0.001 1.0 0.480 0.02 2.0 0.709 0.02 3.0 0.989 0.004 4.0 1.256 0.05 5.0 1.566 0.03 6.0 1.811 0.04 Sample Calculations: Extension: = (Length After Extension)

2. ## HL Physics Revision Notes

Outline an application of the use of a laser Technology (bar-code scanners, laser disks) Reading and writing of CD?s G2: Optical Instruments: Define the terms principal axis, focal point, focal length and linear magnification as applied to a converging (convex) • Over 160,000 pieces
of student written work
• Annotated by
experienced teachers
• Ideas and feedback to 