• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The Latent Heat of Fusion

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

THE LATENT HEAT OF FUSION

Aim:

  1. To determine the latent heat of fusion of ice.

Equipment:

  1. Ice;
  2. Water;
  3. Thermometer;
  4. Calorimeter;
  5. Digital scale.

This is the table which I filled during my determination:

RAW DATA

DATA PROCESSING

m of the calorimeter/g; ±0.2g

Initial t of water/°C; ±0.5 °C

t of ice/°C;

Final t of water/°C; ±0.5 °C

m calorimeter + m water/g; ±0.2g

m calorimeter + m water + m ice/g; ±0.2g

m of the water/g; ±0.4g

m of the ice/g; ±0.4g

Latent heat of fusion of ice/ J*kg-1; ± 3x104J*kg-1

35.0

18.0

0

8.0

163.3

181.6

128.3

18.3

2.77 x 105

Recording raw data:

First of all, I prepare my working place and start my determination. All my measurements are recorded to the table above.

 The smallest graduation of the thermometer is 1 °C. According to this, I take the absolute uncertainty of my temperature measurements as ±0.5 °C. I do not add additional uncertainty as I did not encounter any further difficulties in weight measurement.

To

...read more.

Middle

After having determined the raw data, I fill it into the table.

Further I provide constants that will be used during my determination. These are taken from Giancoli Physics 5th edition, page 421:

cwater = 4186 J*(kg*°C)-1

caliuminium = 900 J*(kg*°C)-1

Data processing:

Now I will provide the mass of the water. To do this I will subtract the mass of the calorimeter from the mass of calorimeter and water together:

mwater =  (163.3 ±0.2) – (35.0 ±0.2) = (128.3 ±0.4) g

To determine the mass of the ice I will subtract the mass of water and calorimeter from the mass of calorimeter, water and ice together:

mice =  (181.6 ±0.2) – (163.3 ±0.2) = (18.3 ±0.4) g

I fill the table with my findings.

Now I theoretically assume that there are no temperature losses while the water gets colder to the final temperature. I assume that Qlost = Qgained.

Now to determine the latent heat of fusion of ice I will fill that formula:

caliuminium*mcalorimeter*(tinitial – tfinal) + cwater*mwater

...read more.

Conclusion

Furthermore, some systematic errors have occurred as I had to do a lot of calculations and roundings during the data processing part. Also, the instruments may have been badly calibrated and this could have affected my determination. However, systematic errors are not important because even if they even were encountered, they were very small. Another thing is with random errors and heat loss as they were really significant because the percentage uncertainty shows relevantly high result.

I could provide several suggestions to improve the determination but obviously I am not able to make this determination not theoretically in school’s conditions. First of all, I would rather use more ice, bigger calorimeter and more water. Then, as I would still use the same equipment with same absolute uncertainties, the percentage uncertainty would be reduced significantly. The uncertainty would be less important and more accurate results would come. However, my suggestions would only lesser the uncertainties, but they would not totally cancel them and it would still be only a theoretical determination.

...read more.

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate Physics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate Physics essays

  1. IB Latent Heat of Fusion of Ice Lab

    � Heat loss = ((34.84 g � 0.02 g) � (4.20 J g-1 �C-1) � (13.00 �C � 0.10 �C)) + ((36.14 g � 0.01g) � (0.385 J g-1 �C-1) � (13.00 �C � 0.10 �C)) � Heat loss = (1902.26 J � ((0.02 � 34.84 � 100)

  2. Specific latent heat of fusion of ice

    * Then I filled the beaker with water up to a certain level and measured the mass of it with the water. * Then I calculated the difference between the masses ((beaker + water) - empty beaker), which gave me the mass of the water used.

  1. Experiment to Measure the Heat of Fusion of Ice

    323.7 335.4 Mass of ice mi (g) mi = mc + w + i - mc + w 33.2 33.4 Change in Temperature of water formed from ice ?Ti = T2 (?C) 37 43 Calculations: Heat Lost ?Qlost = mccc?T + mwcw?T First Trial ?Qlost = (183.5*0.9*33)

  2. The weakest force of the universe

    nucleons is consistent with a strong force coupling constant of about 14: Analysis of the coupling constant with quantum chromodynamics gives an expression for the diminishing coupling constant: For the second force, the electromagnetic force causes electric and magnetic effects. It is long-ranged, but much weaker than the strong force.

  1. HL Physics Revision Notes

    Voltmeters are used to measure the voltage in the circuit. They are connected in parallel with the component under test. Voltmeters have a very high resistance so that very little current is allowed to flow through them. An ideal voltmeter has an infinite resistance.

  2. Researching water turbine designs.

    The litres per second flow rate would then be exactly one tenth of the time it took to fill the 10-litre bucket. This method can be employed if you have a narrow opening through a weir or a pipe operating at its maximum flow rate.

  1. Experiment to compare the radiation of heat from different objects.

    level from which the temperatures can be recorded for all the other observations to. Room temperature- for this variable we must always check the room temperature after regular intervals. If one is performing an experiment under an AC , then the person must set the temperature at which he or

  2. IB Investigating Specific Latent Heat of Vaporization of Water

    Percentage error is (100) The total percent error is 10.6% and the total percent uncertainty is 2.5% which is quite low compared to the percentage error. 2.5% uncertainty means the final result can be ±2.5% off. That means the total error caused by uncertainties is 2.5%, rest is from systematic errors.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work