• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

What would be the best geo-science solution to stop global warming?

Extracts from this document...


What would be the best geo-science solution to stop global warming?

        Global warming and climate change cause an increase in average global temperatures. Natural events and human activities are believed to be contributing to an increase in average global temperatures. This is mostly caused by increases in “greenhouse” gases such as Carbon Dioxide (CO2). The greenhouse effect is actually a natural process, it helps to keep the Earths temperature warm enough for life to grow, without this process most of the sun’s heat would escape back into space and the Earth’s average temperature would be significantly lower. However, if the greenhouse effect becomes stronger, then more heat gets trapped than needed, and the Earth might become less habitable for humans, plants and animals. Human activity has caused an imbalance in the natural cycle of the greenhouse effect and related processes. Increased greenhouse gases and the greenhouse effect have contributed to an overall warming of the Earth’s climate, leading to a global warming. Even just a 2°C increase can have impacts around the world to biodiversity, agriculture, the oceans etc.  The result can be extreme weather patterns, such as more hurricanes, drought and longer and more

...read more.


        Another idea is having giant reflectors in space. These reflectors will mirror or divert some of the suns rays away from earth.  As we already have several space stations and thousand of man-made objects flying around in space, this idea does not seem totally unrealistic. Trillions of mirrors would have to be fired into space to make a 100,000 mile large sun shield. This would cost at least 17 trillion dollars and it would take decades to get all the parts of the shield up into space and fixed together. In addition to those cost, the mirror pieces would have to be replaced every 50 years. Considering all the disadvantages, this method also seems highly inefficient. Opponents of this project argue that one could use all that money to fight the problem at its root, the emission of greenhouse gases.  

        The previous two ideas were trying to let less of the sun rays get to the Earth, so that our earth gets less warmed up. However they both don’t do anything against the CO2 produced, which means that CO2 will still be trapping to much heat in our atmosphere. The next project aims to reduce the amount of CO2 in our atmosphere by replanting deforested areas. This would be done by dropping seeds from a plane.

...read more.


        In conclusion, most of the methods mentioned are not developed enough. We will not be seeing these methods in near future, as they are simply not realistic enough to actually work or they are not efficient enough. I think that we should not be spending lots of money on getting rid of the CO2 that is already in the atmosphere or the global warming up, instead we should put this money into research on an alternative of CO2 outputs, fossil fuels.  This way we would not have the problem of having to much CO2 in our atmosphere, and thus no greenhouse effect.  Based on this conclusion, I think that the tree replanting method and the Helium filled wind turbines are the best solutions, but they are not perfect. There is still a lot to be done until we have a CO2 free world.


"Global Warming." Oracle ThinkQuest Library. Web. 18 Oct. 2010. <http://library.thinkquest.org/CR0215471/global_warming.htm>.

Except from the first paragraph the only source I used was the movie we watched in class. I don’t know the name of the movie.


...read more.

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate Physics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate Physics essays

  1. Experiment on looking at enthalpy of solutions

    28,00 17,10 17,40 17,25 29,00 17,10 17,30 17,20 30,00 17,10 17,30 17,20 31,00 17,10 17,30 17,20 32,00 17,00 17,30 17,15 33,00 17,10 17,30 17,20 34,00 17,00 17,30 17,15 35,00 17,00 17,30 17,15 36,00 17,00 17,30 17,15 37,00 17,00 17,20 17,10 38,00 17,00 17,30 17,15 39,00 17,00 17,20 17,10 40,00 17,00

  2. Telescopes - science research project.

    Any one of its mirror could be the biggest optical telescope in North America. The ratios as for 95 % Strehl in M band and 60-90 % in H band are attainted by the LBT. The total cost for a telescope was calculated as from $970 million to $1.2 billion.

  1. UV rays

    UV rays also assure that there is no residual effect that can be harmful to humans or aquatic life. UV rays also form Vitamin-D, as it is proved resistant to infection, and has a general tonic effect. The special bulbs called ``black lights'' produce a lot of UV and were used by hospitals to kill bacteria, amoebas, and other micro-organisms.

  2. HL Physics Revision Notes

    This lens is called an achromatic doublet, the two types of glass produce equal but opposite dispersion State the conditions necessary to observe interference between two sources they must have the same phase the phase difference between them must remain constant Explain, by means of the principle of superposition, the

  1. Researching water turbine designs.

    It can operate between 20% and 100% of the maximal design flow. The efficiency is lower than for the Pelton and Francis turbines. Compared to the Pelton, a Turgo turbine has a higher rotational speed for the same flow and head.

  2. Energy Exploration Project

    A nuclear power plant would only require 0.035 pounds of uranium to power the light bulb for a year because uranium has so much energy. That means that it needs 20400 times more coal than uranium. A 1.5 MW wind turbine operating at 25% capacity (normal conditions)

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work